Luciferianism History And Culture Theology Religion Essay Example

The Ordo Luciferis, in contrast to The Ordo Luciferi, is a religious group of Luciferians representing a high level of Masonry. The Ordo Luciferi is an international organization that does not enforce a strict religion or dogmatic belief system. Also known as The Luciferian Order, The Ordo Luciferi exists to facilitate discussions about philosophy, magic, and lifestyle. There is a designated working group within this organization responsible for coordinating events, often referred to as "The Official Think Tank of the Luciferian Order," and is actively involved in developing supernatural techniques.

The Temple of the Dark Sun, also known as The Order of the Dark Sun, is a supernatural Luciferian organization that believes in harnessing both white energies and black energies (Earth and existence) to establish natural balance. This selective organization has different requirements for each class within its system and promotes members accordingly. In addition to the various cults worshiping and following Lucifer, there are different faiths and belief systems around the world that worship different gods. Despite variations in iconology and practices, common threads can be found.

The concept most prominent in their systems is dualism. According to Merriam Webster, dualism is a philosophy that posits the existence of two opposing forces, one good and the other immoral. (2003: 384) This definition helps us understand that dualism represents a complex balance between good and evil.

The concept of sorting and teaching individuals the difference between good and evil has been prevalent throughout various civilizations. Ancient Egyptians utilized mythology as a means to educate their society on behavior and faith. According to the source, myths often revolve around conflicts or battles between mythological characters (Idem, 1221). All of

these examples highlight the dichotomy between human beings and nature. Duality always entails the existence of two opposing elements or characteristics. It is akin to contrasting and opposing aspects.

We can explore the contrast between God and Satan/Lucifer, good and evil, yin and yang, the Egyptian Gods Horus and Seth, etc. The primary dichotomy in mysticism is that of good versus immorality. Although there are other dichotomies, they ultimately lead us to these two concepts: good and evil. Examining the dichotomy created by God and Lucifer/Satan reveals different perceptions based on faith or belief. Skeptics refuse to acknowledge God's existence while Christians hold firm faith in Him. Immorality present in this world stands as a key reason skeptics reject the existence of God.

Skeptics argue that if God created everything, including the universe, then He must have also created evil. They support their argument with examples from the Bible. In Isaiah (45:7), it is stated: "I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evils: I the LORD do all these things." Similarly, in Amos (3:6), it is asked: "Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? Shall there be evil in a city, and the LORD has not done it?" Passages from Lamentations (3:38) also question whether both evil and good come from God's mouth: "Does not both evil and good proceed out of the mouth of the Most High?"

Although evil is intangible and imperceptible through the senses, skeptics frequently contend that God is accountable for its creation, using the Bible as proof. Nevertheless, the Bible directly denies this assertion and affirms that God is incapable of

engaging in such behavior: "God is not a man, that He should lie, Nor a son of man, that He should repent; Has He said, and will He not do it? Or has He spoken, and will He not make it good?" (23:19). Skeptics commonly tend to prefer the King James Bible.

The controversy surrounding the use of this translation arises from its utilization of an archaic form of contemporary English, potentially resulting in a divergence of meaning compared to when it was translated over four centuries ago. Additionally, the King James Version originated from a restricted selection of medieval manuscripts and does not encompass the earliest Alexandrian manuscripts. Diverse interpretations exist for the translated King James Version, such as Isaiah 45:7 now being rendered as "I form the light and create darkness, I bring prosperity and create disaster; I, the LORD, do all these things."

Isaiah 45:7 illustrates the contrast between antonyms. It presents darkness as the opposite of visible radiation, whereas evil does not function as the opposite of peace. The Hebrew term for "peace" is "shaI‚loI‚m," which encompasses multiple meanings, primarily associated with the general well-being of individuals, including completeness, soundness, public assistance, and peace. Conversely, the Hebrew word "RaI‚a?›aI‚h," rendered as "evil" in the King James Version, often denotes adversity or disaster.

There are two signifiers of the word. In Amos 3:6: "If a cornet is blown in a metropolis will non the people tremble? If a catastrophe occurs in a metropolis has non the LORD done it?" translated "When a cornet sounds in a metropolis, do non the people tremble? When catastrophe comes to a metropolis, has non the LORD caused it?" (3:6).

Likewise, Amos 3:6 uses the same word, "raI‚a?›aI‚h", mentioning to "catastrophe" or "catastrophe". The context (a catastrophe go oning to a metropolis) does non mention to moral immorality. These illustrations are really exemplifying to indicate out that God is non the writer of immorality: "For You are non a God who takes pleasance in evil; No immorality dwells with You." (Psalm 5:4).

Let it not be said that when one is tempted, they are tempted by God; for God cannot be tempted by evil, and He Himself does not entice anyone. (James 1:13). When discussing the dichotomy, the nature of the individual is inherently dual. Philosophers hold different viewpoints, but this duality is reflected in all of them.

In discussing the inherent nature of people, both Thomas Hobbes and Aristotle present contrasting views. According to Hobbes, humanity is naturally prone to violence and has a tendency to become more animal-like. In contrast, Aristotle argues that human nature tends towards goodness. In his work The Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle expands on the belief originated by Plato that ignorance is the root cause of immorality. He asserts that through education, every individual can overcome this ignorance and develop into a better person.

Aristotle emphasizes that personal growth can be achieved through deep thought, observation, learning from experiences, and engaging in philosophical practices. Additionally, he stresses not only the possibility but also the moral obligation for individuals to strive for self-improvement.

Evil is subjective and lacks a universally accepted definition. It differs from person to person, testing their morals and inclination towards wrongdoing. Evil entails intentional actions that bring harm, rather than being accidental. The individual responsible for the evil act acknowledges its

immorality but opts to proceed regardless. Despite its repugnance, evil serves an essential purpose in coexisting with goodness in our world.

The theory of dichotomy states that the universe requires a presence capable of distinguishing between acts of goodness and immorality. To maintain balance, evil must coexist with good for life to continue. This theory suggests that existence is an ongoing battle between opposing forces: immorality and goodness, which mutually nullify each other.

St. Thomas Aquinas posits that evil lacks intent or substance since it was not brought into existence by God and is not sanctioned to endure by Him. Instead, evil solely arises from the choices made by humans exercising their free will. Aquinas asserts that evil does not possess an essence, form, or substance akin to goodness.

Instead of evil being present, it is the absence of goodness or lack thereof. God's creations and animals have a purpose, which is inherently good as it originates from God. A person's nature is oriented towards this purpose, which is good. However, when individuals exercise their free will to choose not to pursue this purpose directly or indirectly, they go against their own inherent nature and commit evil. The problem of evil has been a topic of concern for humanity since many centuries before organized religion existed. Early philosophers extensively debated its defining characteristics.

Socrates, an ancient Greek philosopher who resided in Athens approximately 400 years prior to the birth of Christ, posited that comprehending oneself serves as the crucial factor in discerning between good and evil. Nevertheless, achieving this understanding proved to be a formidable task. Over two millennia later, theologians continue to engage in conversations regarding the concept

of evil. At the heart of this discourse lies the difficulty of pinpointing the fundamental nature of evil and articulating it in a manner that compels humanity to confront and assess its own actions. Socrates believed that acquiring knowledge facilitated such confrontation. However, theologians throughout history have endeavored to define the predicament using more concrete language.

St. Augustine believed that God permits evil to exist in order to enhance people's faith in Him, even though He is completely good and all-powerful. St. Augustine extensively studied the presence of evil alongside a wholly good and omnipotent God, acknowledging both the inherent goodness of everything created by God and the existence of evil in the world. Consequently, his objective was to gain a better understanding of evil as a way to strengthen his own belief.

In his inquiry, he questioned the cause of immorality despite the goodness of the body and soul that are created by God. Initially, he held the belief that God created a perfect world, but His creatures chose to turn away from God voluntarily, leading to the origin of evil. Augustine, in his examination of the problem of immorality, argues that there are various good things. He asserts that without this variety, the overall goodness of things would be less than if this variety did not exist. Moreover, Augustine claims that evil itself is not entirely real. Instead, it depends on something more substantial, such as disease which can be considered a form of evil.

According to Augustine, disease can exist in a body, which is a form of good. He argues that God, who is the source of all existence, does not oppose a positive

being or an evil counterpart. The concepts of good and evil create a yin and yang effect that is deemed necessary for comprehending the balance of life. Distinguishing between what is evil and what is good is challenging since it depends on individual perspectives influenced by different circumstances. Eradicating evil entirely would result in the destruction of everyone on Earth, which would be pointless.

The opposing viewpoint holds that evil does not have to remain intertwined with humanity. There is a belief that evil and good are not truly opposing entities – they are not forces in themselves. Rather, they are merely labels attributed to actions and thoughts, determined by the majority consensus of a society.

Although different locations have their own rules and regulations, this doesn't imply that one place is inherently superior or inferior to another. It simply signifies the uniqueness of each location. This concept also applies to good and evil, as they coexist without being completely opposed to each other. The distinction between them solely depends on an individual's perception and perspective.

The Bible contains numerous instances that emphasize the significance of selecting between good and evil. The Fall bestows upon humanity the responsibility to exercise their own choices, which in turn grants humans an insight into qualities that define their humanity. Although this understanding does not always guide individuals towards virtuous choices, it ensures the preservation of their inherent humanity.

Deprived of autonomy, people lose their sense of self. Human nature encompasses knowledge, which often leads to various human qualities such as modesty, apprehension, remorse, and envy. The Fall bestows these attributes upon individuals. Similarly, intriguing parallels can be observed between the Egyptian deities

Horus and Seth and Lucifer. It seems that Lucifer, Horus, and Seth are regarded as analogous figures.

The all-seeing oculus is attributed to both the oculus of Horus and the oculus of Lucifer. It is claimed that Lucifer-Seth and Lucifer-Horus are parallel entities, thereby indirectly connecting Seth and Horus. Despite being adversaries and sworn enemies, Seth and Horus eventually ceased their attacks on each other. Interestingly, it appears that the all-seeing oculus is adopted by various individuals as their symbol. Additionally, the oculus also holds significance in freemasonry.

Any insight appreciated. It is interesting that in the instance of Isis, Osiris, and Horus one can also say the Father, Son, and the Holy Ghost, or Mary, God, and Jesus. Lucifer was the morning star and Isis also held that title, so I would not say Horus and Lucifer are the same, but I would say there is a connection. Horus and Set were originally expressions of the central dichotomy, the two aspects of Heaven, the day-sky and night-sky. As the Egyptian mythology was elaborated towards its final chaotic state, their symbolism drifted away from these absolute poles into the middle ground, first becoming solar, and eventually taking on a variety of solar/martial and zodiacal features.

Despite this, their final symbol can still be represented through the astrological signs of Aries and Scorpio. Together, these symbols represent the manifestation of opposing male aspects of the cardinal dichotomy. From Budge's Gods of the Egyptians, a compilation of myths, some features associated with the Gods showcase their positions as opposite ends of a dichotomy. These extracted features include Horus being linked to daytime, life, fire, and its symbol: Rams. Additionally, Horus

is perceived as a killer, representing the emergence of life.

He is both the conqueror and the king and he soars in the sky and acquires Seth's masculinity. On the opposite side, Seth is linked with the complete opposite qualities of Horus: blackness, death, water, and its symbol: Scorpio. He is perceived as a victim, the withdrawal of life and its resurgence. He is both the prey and the rebel as he descends into the ground. In its broadest form, Aries is depicted by the myth-pattern named the Man-Who-Lives, which remains essentially unchanged across different mythologies. He is the warrior who, through triumph, becomes the ruler and reigns until he is defeated by Death.

Cabalistically speaking, he symbolizes the transformation of the masculine sexual energy into a radiant child, or the transformation of fire-by-friction into solar fire. Scorpio is a water sign, representing the withdrawal of life from the plant ground at the end of the growing season, and its consolidation into the seed, which is buried in the Earth to await a new life. Expanding this principle into the animal realm accounts for its association with the act of sex. Horus cannot maintain a state of dominance without a self-centered and emotionally detached population to govern.

Set/Scorpio, his opposition, desires to break free from emotional passivity and disrupt normal life in order to bring about new conditions. Set's mythological role is that of the Man-Who-Dies. One aspect of Set's story involves being the victim of Horus, who kills Set to enhance his own reputation. Apart from murdering Osiris, Set's involvement in active violence in Egyptian mythology is rare. In contrast, the myths of Horus are known for

their detailed accounts of killing.

Traditionally, Scorpio embodies various archetypal roles. One role is that of the eternal victim, constantly being killed by Horus in different forms only to reappear and be killed again. Another role is that of the Rebel, a man who refuses to be conquered and operates underground, secretly opposing the conqueror because he lacks the power to openly resist. Scorpio also represents the archetype of the suffering individual who chooses death over compromising their principles. In a broader sense, Scorpio's Eagle aspect signifies a strong attachment to ideals even if it means sacrificing worldly pursuits.

There is also a partial comparison between Scorpio and the Phoenix, a mythical bird that self-destructs to be reborn. From a mystical perspective, Set symbolizes the transformation of fiery conflict into electric fire, which represents the divine will. He is a wanderer, a figure who separates from his normal life and community, goes through extraordinary challenges and trials, and ultimately returns as a semi-divine being to save the community from destruction and domination by the conqueror. Both characters are heroes, both crucial to the fulfillment of the hero's mission. They embody similar energies but with different emphasis.

While Aries and Scorpio share similarities in their individual characteristics, when combined they represent the duality of Gemini. This can be seen in various myths such as Horus/Set, Cain/Abel, Romulus/Remus, and even God/Lucifer. In these stories, they sometimes appear to be in conflict and other times they work together. By examining the myth of the feud between Horus and Seth, we can draw parallels to Christianity. Even those who do not practice Christianity are familiar with the biblical teachings of Lucifer (the

Devil) and God, which symbolize the eternal struggle between good and evil. So, how do we define what is good and what is evil? Are there universal indicators that can help us determine whether an action is good or evil? Can we judge a person as good or evil? The holy texts of different religions offer various answers to these questions. The first set of passages defines good and evil by examining their outcomes.

Both good individuals and good titles yield good fruits, while evil individuals and evil titles yield evil fruits. The fruits serve as a reflection of the individual's character and sincerity. Two notable sets of good fruits are the Confucian Five Happinesses and the Christian Fruits of the Spirit. Additionally, transitions play a role in distinguishing between good and evil based on intent and purpose. Intent can be guided by objective criteria such as the Dhamma, the will of God, or the Way of Heaven. On the other hand, intent can also be internal and intuitive.

The ability to determine good and evil based on intention or purpose allows one to recognize good or evil even if the outcome is not visible. However, since intention is often hidden, it may need to be revealed through testing, as in the final choices. In the book of Saint Matthew, we can read: "The action that I desire to perform with my body is a harm to myself and others; it causes suffering. Reflecting on this, if you find a similar action, Rahula, you should definitely avoid doing it."

(7.16-20) In Buddhism, there are five sources of happiness: long life, wealth, physical health, mental peace, love of virtue,

and a peaceful end to life. On the other hand, the six major sins are: misfortunes that shorten life, illness, mental distress, poverty, evil, and weakness. Another important contrast is represented by the Yin and Yang symbol in Chinese culture. This symbol represents the ancient Chinese understanding of the balance between good and evil and how things function.

The larger circle symbolizes "everything," while the black and white shapes within the circle represent the interplay of two energies known as "yin" (black) and "yang" (white), which drive everything forward. They are not purely black or purely white, just as life itself is not entirely black or white, and they cannot exist without each other. Yin is derived from yin, meaning "clouds" or "clouded conditions," and fu, meaning "hill." Yang is derived from yang, meaning "Sun," "sunny hill," and again fu. Therefore, they represent the dark and light sides of a hill, and by extension, the dark and light aspects of everything and the inherent nature of individuals.

The concept of antonyms, such as Yin Yang, the brotherhood and harmoniousness of opposites, has been present in both Eastern and Western philosophy since ancient times. Among the Ancient Greek Philosophers, Heraclitus and Parmenides both understood that the Universe was unified and dynamic. According to Bertrand Russell's writings on Heraclitus, he believed that the integrity of things could be found in their necessary construction or agreement rather than their material substance. This underlying structure or Logos, which was not superficially apparent, was primarily manifested in a single dynamic substance, fire. Fire was responsible for both the regularity of natural changes and the essential connection of opposites. Heraclitus embraced this traditional

analysis of distinction through balanced interaction.

The significant aspect for Heraclitus was the regularity that exists within change. Yin and Yang, which are antonyms, represent opposing forces that can be compared to the different seasons of the year or different levels of energy or matter. This opposition is relative and can only be understood in terms of relationships. Yin and Yang are always in a state of constant change, but they maintain a delicate balance.

They are interdependent, which means they cannot exist without each other. The Tai Ji diagram illustrates the relationship of Yin and Yang, symbolizing their mutual reliance. Yin and Yang are not separate entities but rather inseparable components. When one reaches a state of total Yin, Yang starts to emerge.

Both Yin and Yang contain the seed of the other and they consistently transform into one another. There is a mutual consumption of Yin and Yang, and their relative degrees are constantly changing. Usually, this alteration is harmonious, but if Yin or Yang become unbalanced, they will affect each other. If one becomes excessive, it can ultimately overpower the other. The transformation from one to the other is not a random event but only occurs when the timing is appropriate.

When discussing a person's nature, there are individuals who struggle to balance their good and evil qualities. This holds true in both real life and fiction, where good and evil coexist. However, despite the need for equilibrium, one of these forces often dominates the other. People cannot be solely good or evil; their true nature encompasses both. Additionally, individuals may perceive good or evil differently based on their own perspectives.

Gerald Messadie, in A History of

the Devil, argues that in the 1980s there was a significant and symbolic example of geographical transfer. The President of the United States, Ronald Reagan, referred to the USSR as "the Evil Empire," while the de facto leader of Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini, referred to the United States as "The Great Satan." These rhetorical expressions demonstrate that the concept of hell, associated with the Devil, differs depending on one's perspective and that the Devil has become a politically convenient figure (Messadie, 1997: 3). There are also organizations that worship either good or evil. As mentioned earlier in this chapter, there are Luciferian cults. Additionally, there are other cults that are less known and their practices and intentions are unclear. The Illuminati and Freemasons are examples of such complex and extensively debated organizations.

There is no information available about these organizations, only hearsay and speculation. However, it is often claimed that these organizations have control over the world, although we do not know which one is the most dominant. Below are various anonymous opinions. Some suggest that what we consider historical facts occur on two levels. The first level is visible to anyone who is in public or has access to television and the internet.

This paragraph discusses the hidden plane known as the second plane. It is described as being invisible to most individuals. Within this concealed dimension, the future of the universe is carefully designed. The writers of this text are part of a secret group that has been observing the destinies of humanity for thousands of years. These individuals are commonly referred to as the Illuminati.

If we can just imagine for a moment that everything we

know about the world around us is a massive deception, much of what the media presents to us is lies and manipulation. All the things they claim to be "free" are actually just the result of a long history of official lies. In this scenario, we would gradually realize that the true source of power in this universe is not the United States, Russia, Japan, or the EU, who are all just players in this game. The real masters of the planet operate from the shadows, unknown and anonymous.

Darkness serves as the connector and organizer of various elements. It oversees countless domains with an unimaginable level of authority, shaping laws and instigating change. It determines the replacement of one state by another and ushers in new ideologies and even religions.

Very little is known about the individualities and nationalities of the Illuminati, as one can easily infer. However, their programs can be seen as a veil in the eyes of those seeking the truth, as it is erased by their thirst for knowledge and yearning for true freedom. Their power is vast and terrifying to those who gain any knowledge about them. Throughout the centuries, they have perfected the art of conspiracy to the pinnacle of perfection.

They utilize four effective strategies, both simple and difficult to oppose: they instigate conflicts and wars between two opposing parties, never themselves participating, they operate behind the scenes, providing financial support to all parties involved in the conflict, and they are always viewed as the mediator who resolves the conflict. Freemasonry neither incorporates the properties nor personification of Lucifer or Satan in its beliefs or rituals. This matter is only

noteworthy due to the fact that critics of Freemasonry have accused the organization of idolizing Lucifer. The confusion arises from certain nineteenth century Masonic writers such as Albert Pike and Albert G. Mackey, who used the term "luciferian" in its classical or literary sense to refer to a pursuit of knowledge.

According to John Robinson, it is important to emphasize the purpose behind the use of the phrases "Luciferian way" and "energies of Lucifer" by Albert Pike and other Masonic scholars over a century ago. These phrases referred to the morning star, the carrier of light, and the pursuit of illumination, which is the complete opposite of dark, evil behavior. Roger Firestone views freemasonry as a fraternal organization that promotes morality, charity, and the study of philosophy. It does not have clergy, sacraments, or guarantee salvation for its members. Sometimes, philosophy is mistaken for religion because both disciplines address similar issues.

Both faith and doctrine inquire about the purpose of existence, the nature of the world, ethical standards, interpersonal behaviors, and the most significant aspects of life. Religion incorporates important rituals for significant life events and specific times of the year. Unlike doctrine, religion distinguishes between what is sacred and what is profane. Religious practices often involve a belief in the supernatural or miraculous. The Freemasons originated as trade club members in England during the early 1700s, coming together to form Lodges. They emphasized religious tolerance, equality among male members, and the principles of classical liberalism and the Enlightenment.

Currently, the fraternity of Freemasons is a global organization that continues to educate its members on philosophical ideas and participate in harmless rituals. Additionally, it provides networking opportunities for

business and political leaders, as well as engages in charitable activities. The concept of a widespread Freemason alliance originated in the late 1700s and thrived especially in the United States during the 1800s. Supporters of this theory often highlight alleged Masonic symbols, such as the pyramid and the eye on the back of the dollar bill, as evidence of this alliance. However, the relationship between Lucifer and witchcraft raises further questions. In Fire Island and coastal South Suffolk County, New York, rests one of the most significant areas for witches worldwide. It is here that Ray Buckland, considered the founder of modern Wicca, extended the practice of witchcraft across the globe.

Long Island's geography is what makes it significant, as it is the most crucial stretch of land in the North with a beach facing south towards the Atlantic Ocean. This unique positioning results in an exceptional amount of winter sunshine for Long Island. The Sun