Disruptive Behavior in the Workplace Essay Example
Disruptive Behavior in the Workplace Essay Example

Disruptive Behavior in the Workplace Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 9 (2433 words)
  • Published: January 9, 2017
  • Type: Case Study
View Entire Sample
Text preview

Both companies and healthcare institutions, like hospitals, have a global presence and are focused on profitability and market share. In order for hospitals to succeed, it is essential that their employees are aligned with these goals as they play a vital role in propelling the organization forward. This is especially important because patients, who are the main customers of hospitals, now have the ability to compare services provided by various healthcare facilities worldwide, including urgent care centers and clinics.

In order to avoid failure, it is essential to have a culture that promotes employee growth while discouraging disruptive behavior. This paper aims to explore the connection between employee groups, disruptive behaviors (such as horizontal violence), and the performance of a nursing unit.

The paper examines the impact of common employee groups on a departmen

...

t's performance, focusing on disruptive behavior, particularly horizontal behavior. It takes as its basis the performance problem of a nursing unit at General Hospital, a fictional hospital. It explores the relationship between department internal factors and business unit performance. Everyone possesses a passion for something, and for many, that passion lies in achieving success. However, the journey towards success can be filled with various challenges, leading to frustration.

Success is an abstract concept with diverse interpretations. Some define success as owning a mansion, driving a luxury car, possessing real estate properties, obtaining a college degree, or being content with their job. As an organizational development practitioner, I regularly encounter individuals striving to achieve their own version of "success." Many people work tirelessly in pursuit of their version of the American dream (Ogbu, 1990). According to Daft (2007)

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

organizations aim to attain success.

Organizations need alignment between company and employees' goals for success. This is especially important for hospital executives in the healthcare industry. Hospitals face challenges due to changes in globalization, rapid environmental changes, customer demands, and support for diversity (Daft, 2007). General Hospital (fictional name) is currently struggling to stay competitive in the Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB GYN) market.

The hospital is going through changes in its external and internal environments. Externally, new competitors have entered the market, challenging the hospital's position. Previously, the hospital had a unique advantage of providing OB GYN services in the south county and delivering over 3,000 babies each year. However, other hospitals within a 15 mile radius now offer similar services, leading to a decrease in patient numbers and a loss of market share. Internally, the department is facing significant issues.

Sue Ellen, a Clinical Educator at General Hospital, raised an issue during a recent meeting. In her role as the educator for the OB GYN Department, Sue Ellen is in charge of supervising employee performance, arranging clinical in-services, and keeping track of employee education records based on JCAHO standards. Unfortunately, she has observed that her department is not meeting performance expectations.

There is growing concern about the escalating challenge of reaching or exceeding the monthly target of 250 deliveries. The majority of department staff have been employed at the hospital for over ten years, having collaborated with various directors and managers in the past. The current management team consists of a Director, Clinical Manager, Assistant Nurse Manager, and Clinical Educator, who are relatively new and have only worked together for

a year. The long-standing employees have formed close relationships among themselves and seldom include newcomers in their circle.

Furthermore, the department is understaffed and lacks support for new employees. As a result, there is limited cooperation and information sharing among staff members. One particular group intimidates others, causing them to conform and resist any changes. Moreover, when inexperienced employees seek assistance with difficult tasks, they often face resistance from more experienced colleagues, whether it be openly or secretly.

Moreover, employees are being informed about unfavorable aspects of the department. These factors have adverse effects on employee performance, often resulting in unfinished assignments and an upsurge in sentinel events (near fatal mishaps). Additionally, the department received multiple citations during a recent federal JCAHO audit, which necessitates rectifications within the next 90 days. As a result, employee morale is currently at its lowest point. This educator is ready to experiment with any approach to address these problems.

The objective is to form a solid and unified group, with employees collaborating as an efficient team. Ms. Ewen's endeavors are backed by the department director, who has granted her the power to introduce initiatives that target performance problems. Nevertheless, major alterations will need authorization from the Director, Chief Nursing Officer, and ultimately the Hospital President.

In the United States, companies engage in intense competition within a free market system. It is common for major corporations to lobby the government to establish barriers to entry in their specific market segment, with the intention of maintaining their competitive edge. However, this conduct goes against the principles of a free market system (Kaserman, Mayo, Blank, Kahai, 1999).

justify">
According to Boone (2008), the elimination of barriers to entry is crucial for increasing competition in markets. When new competitors join the market, companies are motivated to work harder to maintain their competitive advantage. General Hospital is currently dealing with the presence of more OBGYN units nearby. Therefore, they must put in dedicated efforts to reduce or eliminate any internal factors that could lead to an unsuccessful department.

It is crucial for companies to study and comprehend the different groups and sub-groups within their organizational structure (Campion, Medsker, & Higgs, 1993). These groups, which can be both formal professional and informal social in nature, are created by organizations and can exist for varying durations (Robbins, 2005). Professional groups within an organization may consist of university faculty and staff, department managers, executive council members, retention and recruitment committees, or shared governance committees at hospitals.

According to Robbins (2005), groups in organizations are usually formed either based on job levels or with the purpose of achieving the company's goals. In contrast, social interest groups are typically established to improve working relationships, raise cultural awareness, or promote inclusion. These groups often focus on aspects such as ethnicity, cultural awareness, sexual orientation, or nationality.

In an organization, there are non-organization related groups known as "friendship groups" or cliques that form due to shared interests and can have a notable impact. According to Robbins (2005), these groups typically go through a five stage cycle - forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning - which the company should closely monitor.

According to Robbins (2005), as a group goes through the first four stages, it becomes more effective. However,

there are instances when the group members' activities can cause them to get stuck in a stage, such as storming, which hinders the group's progress. Additionally, the group cultures within an organization play a vital role in the successful growth of the company (Lowes, 1996).

He also mentioned that if a company is not familiar with the dynamics of its different internal groups, it could undermine its success (Lowes, 1996). Lowes (1996) also proposed that the behavior of group members is influenced by the size of the group, and as it grows, its culture usually changes. As the group size increases and its culture transforms, it can cause the group to develop a more exclusive and close-knit personality, resulting in resistance towards new members joining (Daft, 2007).

It can be inferred that management needs to invest time in understanding group dynamics to achieve successful growth (Anonymous, 1978). Disruptive behaviors within a group can include individuals who pout when they do not get their way, act as bullies, throw tantrums, engage in verbal abuse and physical threats (Waggoner, 2005), refuse to perform tasks, avoid answering questions from peers, or use condescending language (The Joint Commission, 2008).

The text below highlights additional examples of negative work behavior, which are often associated with low productivity. These behaviors include what Waggoner (2005) identified as "Chicken Little" and "victim." In the department, Chicken Little employees are regarded as the pessimistic individuals who believe that any new approach will fail. On the other hand, victims exhibit a "poor me" attitude (Waggoner, 2005). The Joint Commission, the accrediting body for healthcare entities, has addressed this issue and issued an alert stating

that behavior from employees that oppresses others is labeled as disruptive behavior.

These disruptive behaviors, which can result from factors intrinsic to individuals and institutions, have a detrimental impact on healthcare. They contribute to medical errors, create an unsafe work environment, and lead to low patient satisfaction scores (Trossman, 2008; The Joint Commission, 2008). In addition, these behaviors drive qualified employees to leave organizations (The Joint Commission, 2008). Often, individuals who are under extreme stress or experiencing fatigue engage in such behaviors (Hickson, Pichert, Webb, ; Gabbe, 2007). A study conducted by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) in 2006 found that 65% of critical care nurses had witnessed or experienced disruptive behavior in the past year (Trossman, 2008). The sources of these negative behaviors include physicians, nursing management, patients, and others (Trossman, 2008).

Institutions can encourage disruptive behavior by promoting a culture of excessive work production and endorsing a strict hierarchy that discourages reporting for fear of retaliation. Gerardi (2005) notes that this can lead to horizontal violence within the organization. Hutchingson, Jackson, Wilkes, & Vicker (2008) recommend that healthcare institutions prioritize creating a safe environment for nurses, one where they are protected from aggressive behaviors like bullying from their colleagues.

Bullying in the workplace, known as "nurses eating their young", has been a longstanding issue in hospitals. Scholars have recently examined the effects of horizontal violence on nursing units' overall performance. While nurses may encounter disruptive behavior from patients, family members, and physicians, instances of horizontal violence are mostly between nurses themselves.

A study conducted in the United Kingdom revealed that 38% of surveyed nurses reported experiencing bullying,

while 42% witnessed others being bullied (Stevens, 2002). The study identified common forms of horizontal violence including criticizing, sabotaging, undermining, infighting, blaming, scapegoating, and bickering (Leiper, 2005). Victims of this behavior often experience anger, vulnerability, and frustration (Leiper, 2005). These negative emotions frequently result in low job satisfaction for nurses (Stevens, 2002). Trossman (2002) further stated that horizontal violence has a detrimental impact on healthcare organizations' ability to recruit and retain staff. Disruptive behavior not only harms employees' well-being but also hinders the company's ongoing success (Oostrom ; Mierlo ,2008).

The study conducted by O'Connell, Young, Brooks, Hutchings, & Lofthouse (2000) found that over 70% of nurses surveyed experienced frustration or anger when faced with disruptive behavior. Additionally, another research showed a strong link between workplace conflict or violence and job satisfaction. Those who were subjected to emotional abuse at work reported the lowest levels of job satisfaction (Hesketh, Duncan, Estabrooks, Reimer, Giovannetti, Hyndman, & Acorn, 2003).

According to Trossman (2008), numerous nurses experience low job satisfaction which causes them to become disengaged and disconnected from their work. If these negative behaviors are disregarded, it can encourage more negativity because nurses may imitate the negative behavior they observe, creating an ongoing cycle (Leiper, 2005). Oostrom & Mierlo (2008) clarify that this cycle eventually leads to employees suffering from posttraumatic stress.

The emotional and job satisfaction of employees are not the only areas impacted by disruptive behavior in the workplace; there is also a financial impact resulting from increased absenteeism, resignations, and early retirement (Oostrom & Mierlo, 2008). Furthermore, this type of behavior can lead to problems with patient safety, including patient errors,

death, and low public opinion (Hickson et al). It is vital for hospitals, as well as any organization's overall well-being, to ensure adequate staffing levels and retain nurses.

Nurses play a crucial role in every hospital's operations and are facing a dire shortage. This shortage is further worsened by disruptive behaviors, such as horizontal violence, within the healthcare industry (Rosenstein & O'Daniel, 2005). Studies have revealed that 12% of the nursing shortage can be attributed to disruptive behavior, particularly verbal abuse (Trossman, 2008). Healthcare administrators have become aware of the shortage of nurses, as stated by Rosenstein ; O'Daniel (2005).

A shortage of staff often means that nurses have to care for more patients than they usually would. This can result in a lower quality of care (Oostrom & Mierlo, 2008). According to Miller (2008), hospitals with a higher ratio of patients to nurses tend to have higher morbidity rates. To ensure successful operations, healthcare institutions should adopt a "zero tolerance" policy towards disruptive behaviors (Leiper, 2005).

According to Holmes (2006), organizations should have a culture that clearly communicates zero tolerance for disruptive behavior and enforces consequences for those who engage in it. It is crucial for companies to create and maintain an environment that fosters the belief among employees that there is a support system in place (Leiper, 2005). To tackle this issue, the following recommendations are proposed:

Trossman (2008) recommends the implementation of a code of conduct to foster a non-hostile work environment. This code should include procedures for handling grievances that can be initiated by either employees or the organization.

i) As part of new employee orientation, Human

Resource departments should emphasize the organization’s "zero tolerance" policy towards disruptive behavior (Trossman, 2008). iii) Implementing a mentor program for nursing leadership can aid in identifying and resolving these issues (Trossman, 2008).

The organization should design and facilitate educational programs that teach managers and lay employees techniques for handling disruptive behaviors (Oostrom & Mierlo).

The suggestion is to integrate assertiveness training into educational programs in order to improve employees' self-confidence and communication skills (Oostrom & Mierlo). It has been observed that the makeup and values of groups within a company often mirror those of the parent organization. Consequently, if the company fosters a harmonious culture, it is likely that both formal and informal groups within the organization will also adopt this mindset (Leiper, 2005).

Healthcare organizations must prioritize creating a hostile-free work environment (Trossman, 2008). It is important for employees to not perceive horizontal violence and other disruptive behaviors as normal or acceptable (Leiper, 2005). Previous research has emphasized the importance of enhancing working relationships among nurses in healthcare settings to mitigate negative patient outcomes (Rosenstein, et al, 2005).

Stevens (2002) suggests that it is important for executives and other leaders to possess the ability to identify and address negative behavior. At General Hospital, efforts are being made to empower staff and nursing leadership in recognizing, preventing, and dealing with disruptive behaviors through the implementation of policies and educational programs. Furthermore, Stevens (2002) predicted that by 2010, the shortage of registered nurses in the United States would reach such a critical level that it would be unable to meet the increasing demand for healthcare services.

To regain its competitive edge

in the OBGYN market, this hospital should consider the earlier recommendations. Furthermore, senior leadership must work diligently to establish a welcoming team environment, implement a system that promotes open communication in all directions, foster a culture that embraces diversity and differing opinions, and genuinely encourage employees to report disruptive behaviors by maintaining an open door policy.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New