Disc Platinum Rule Assessment Paper Essay Example
Disc Platinum Rule Assessment Paper Essay Example

Disc Platinum Rule Assessment Paper Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 5 (1151 words)
  • Published: May 25, 2018
  • Type: Case Study
View Entire Sample
Text preview

In recent years, the importance of studying organizational behavior has grown. Companies understand the necessity to adjust to evolving business cultures and competitive markets. Consequently, there is a stronger focus on comprehending the connection between human behavior and the organization. Numerous companies now allocate resources towards behavior seminars and assessments as training aids for educating their employees and management. The goal of these seminars and assessments is to offer insights into each other's behavior and attitudes, along with strategies for effectively managing them.

In this study of behavior, I will utilize The DISC Platinum Rule Behavioral Style Assessment to determine my primary behavior style. I will subsequently evaluate my style, including its strengths and weaknesses that have been identified. Finally, I will express my agreement or disagreement with the overall assessment. According to the DISC Assessment,


my dominant behavioral type is classified as "The Interactive Style," with a substyle of "Ic."

The Interactive Styles, also referred to as I Style, are sociable individuals who enjoy being in the center of attention. They derive satisfaction from receiving praise, recognition, and compliments. They prioritize relationships over tasks. According to Alessandra (2008), their strengths lie in their enthusiasm, charm, persuasiveness, and warmth. They possess excellent people skills and are proficient in communicating with both individuals and groups.

The Interactive Style is characterized by individuals who excel at getting others excited about their vision and are optimistic with charisma. They possess qualities that help them influence people and build alliances (Alessandra, 2008). However, this style also has weaknesses such as carelessness, poor follow-through, disorganization, and exaggeration. Those with an interactive style tend to get involved in too many thing

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

and quickly lose interest. Their behavior can sometimes be seen as manipulative, impetuous, and excitable in inappropriate situations (Alessandra, 2008).

It is ironic that my behavior style was labeled as Interactive by the DISC assessment because previous tests I have taken in the workplace clearly identified my style as Cautious (C Style), which was also confirmed by two schoolmates who used the DISC Platinum Rule Assessment to assess me further. While I strongly agree with these results, I won't disregard the findings of the DISC Assessment.

Maybe the conditions in which I took the test or my mental state when answering the questions affected my results. Therefore, I will give a dual analysis of both styles after explaining The Cautious Style.

The individuals with The Cautious Style (C Style) are analytical, persistent, and systematic when solving problems. They pay close attention to detail and prioritize substance over style.

The strengths of people with the Cautious Style include being focused on tasks and enjoying improving processes and achieving concrete results.

The Cautious Styles are typically emotionally controlled and may feel uncomfortable around outgoing individuals. They excel in listening and asking questions (Alessandra, 2008). In the workplace, they work at a slower pace to ensure accuracy. They have a serious perception of situations, but their intelligence and ability to consider different perspectives contribute to their unique sense of humor. They conduct research, compare options, assess risks, calculate margins of error, and then take action (Alessandra, 2008). The weaknesses of Cautious Styles include having high expectations for themselves and others, leading to being overly critical. Their perfectionist tendencies can result in over-analyzing and paralysis. They are also skeptical and prefer written

promises over verbal agreements (Alessandra, 2008). Analyzing my DISC Assessment results and considering my interactive behavior style, I gained insight into why I interact with colleagues, family, and others the way I do. From childhood to adulthood, I was always the popular friend and chosen as a leader.

I generally prefer not to take on the role of a leader, but I enjoy participating in activities and completing tasks. However, I have a knack for motivating others and accomplishing tasks with enthusiasm.

This results in me standing out from the crowd and being at the forefront. At work, I am quickly chosen as a leader due to my ability to motivate, charm, and be optimistic. I am always the one who energizes employees and encourages them to work quickly to accomplish departmental tasks and goals. My managers are consistently pleased with my interpersonal skills and frequently use me as a role model when it comes to adapting to new changes and innovations within the department.

I am someone who appreciates change and innovation as they prevent me from getting bored. I am not fond of monotony. DISC provided me with valuable information about the typical business traits associated with my I Style, such as my desire to be involved in important projects or events, my enjoyment of brainstorming, and my need for freedom from control. In my personal relationships, DISC has shed light on why I, as an I Style, react the way I do when I am not given undivided attention or the opportunity to freely express myself.

The behaviors and attitudes that I struggle to identify with in the Interactive Style are the party

animal mentality, manipulative nature, short attention span, poor follow-through, lack of routine, and tendency to become impulsive and stretch the truth under pressure. None of these behaviors or attitudes align with how I live my daily life. After considering previous behavior assessments, training information, and feedback from my DISC school observers, I found that I relate more to the behaviors and attitudes of The Cautious Style.

In both my personal and professional life, I demonstrate a methodical and detail-focused approach. I am recognized for my inquisitiveness, as I value gathering extensive information. Personally, I tend to logically handle all my relationships rather than emotionally. Although appearing as a good listener, I keep my emotions private. Nevertheless, to provide valuable insights while listening, I openly share my thoughts. Within my immediate family and church community, there is constant demand on me and recently I have begun learning to decline requests. In the workplace, I bring the same level of efficiency and commitment to all tasks and responsibilities.

I will ensure the accuracy of my work and demonstrate my ability to multitask. These behaviors and attitudes are also evident in my school environment. This is why both of my school observers identified me as having a C Style. Within my team, I primarily serve as a researcher but also help to maintain focus on the goals, objectives, and deadlines. I analyze the information obtained and ensure thoroughness by following through. These are all behaviors and attitudes associated with the Cautious Style that I consistently display.

Upon discussing the assessment with my team observers and expressing my disappointment at not resonating with the DISC Assessment regarding my predominant

behavior, I made an intriguing discovery. I realized that my DISC Style, identified as I with substyle c, and my DISC observers' Style C with substyle i were completely opposite. Hence, I conclude that studying organizational behavior and utilizing behavior and attitude assessments are vital in cultivating a positive organizational culture.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds