Discussion about stigma
Discussion about stigma

Discussion about stigma

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 6 (2937 words)
  • Published: October 12, 2017
Text preview

This chapter will analyze the term stigma and discourse the negative attitudes that the public clasp towards mental wellness and mental unwellness and suggest why they may hold adopted these positions and attitudes. It will besides turn to the media ‘s function in portraying these positions and prolonging these attitudes towards mental unwellness. An tremendous figure of persons are affected by mental illness worldwide: the World Health Organization ( WHO ) ( 2001 ) has estimated that 1 in 5 individuals will endure from a mental unwellness each twelvemonth. A inquiry that could be asked if mental unwellness is a dominant and prevailing issue within society today why do people still hold these negative positions and attitudes within society? Finally the chapter will reason by doing some recommendations for pattern, ways that stigma can be reduced and how mental wellness and mental unwellness can be portrayed in a more positive visible radiation.

To to the full appreciate the positions and attitudes towards mental unwellness it is of import to understand the construct of stigma. Stigma is derived from the Greek for a grade branded on a slave or condemnable ( White, 1998 ) . Goffman ‘s ( 1963 ) seminal work on stigmatisation has, over the old ages, stimulated a great assortment of educational treatment on the nature, beginnings, and effects of stigma ( Link and Phelan, 2001 ) . Harmonizing to Goffman ( 1963 ) stigma is a physical or psychological grade of shame that makes an single base out from society. Three types of stigmatising Markss identified by Goffman include,’ Ab

...

ominations of the organic structure, tribal stigma, and defects of single character ‘ ( Goffman, 1963, pg 14 ) .

Peoples who encompass these physical or psychological Markss are frequently devalued and dehumanised which accordingly leads to their place within society being corrupted by the straitening effects of stigmatisation ( Goffman, 1963 ) . A definition that can be seen to embrace all facets alongside Goffman is offered by Miles ( 1981 ) cited in Brunton ( 1997 ) who says,0 ‘Societal reaction which singles out certain properties evaluates them as an unwanted and devalues the individuals who possess them. ‘ ( p. 892 )

The agony and loss of chances that seems to ever come manus in manus with a diagnosing of mental unwellness can be seen to be connected to the psychiatric symptoms that can be observed e.g. speaking to voices, the lessening in day-to-day operation, and the dip in a individuals societal operation in society ( Corrigan and Wassel, 2008 ) . However, the loss of chances and the individual with a mental unwellness devaluating their ain ego worth take topographic point for the ground of the stigma that surrounds mental unwellness ( Corrigan and Kleinlein, 2005 ) .

For the intents of this thesis ‘negative ‘ attitudes refers to discriminatory attitudes that are based on bias, stereotypes or inaccurate information. Stereotypes are steadfastly set opinions that are learnt throughout life and held steadfastly in our head ( Stier and Hinshaw, 2007 ) . They are know aparting positions or images related to members of peculiar groups ( Corriga

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay
View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

and Wassel, 2008 ) . Prejudice effects persons in an emotional mode ( Stier and Hinshaw, 2007 ) and occurs when people within society have the same sentiment about a peculiar stereotype and stick on this to a group of people doing negative intensions towards that peculiar group ( Corrigan and Wassel, 2008 ) . Then once more, Corrigan and Wassel ( 2008 ) province that discriminatory behavior can be seen as a direct consequence of bias. This involves a specific group being treated in a dissimilar manner taking to that group non being able to entree chances available to them or their rights being restricted ( Stier and Hinshaw, 2007 ) . Negative attitudes towards people with mental hurt may be manifested by physical and verbal maltreatment, jobs in the workplace or favoritism from people who provide services to people with a mental unwellness ( Mind, 2010 ) .

Negative attitudes are partially constructed in the linguistic communication we use to depict mental unwellness. Peoples with mental hurt are frequently being described in derogatory footings. For illustration, culprits of Acts of the Apostless of force are frequently described as ‘Lunatics, huffy individual ‘ ( Tudor, 1996 ) , ‘schizos, wackos, psychos, monsters, monsters and lunatic ‘ ( Twomley, 2007 ) . This makes a clear nexus between force and mental hurt, it must be acknowledged though that non everyone who is violent needfully has a mental unwellness. Angermeyer and Schulze ( 2001 ) suggest the general public position people with mental unwellness as eccentric, fear-provoking, unprompted, violent and lack self-discipline. From this, hence, it could be suggested that people who have a mental unwellness are perverts or have deviant behavior.

Becker ( 1963 ) defines aberrance as ‘any trait or behavior that was unnatural when compared to the mean population ‘ ( pg. ) . If mental unwellness is classed as pervert so how bad does person hold to move or act to be classed as pervert. This demonstrates that societal regulations that are made allow people to judge others as different or in this instance pervert ( Becker, 1963 ) . This is farther supported by Baumann ( 2007 ) who suggest that the person ‘s image of the universe is created by relatively changeless norms, rules and outlooks.

Angermeyer and Matschinger ( 2005 ) suggests a diagnosing of schizophrenic disorder has, peculiarly, been found to be stigmatising and linked with negative stereotypes such as force and dangerousness. This shows that by mental wellness being medicalised it is deeply unhelpful due to the diagnostic footings such as psychosis which can ‘shackle ‘ people to the mental wellness system ( Watkins, 2007 ) . In contrast Shepherd et Al ( 2008 ) depict the recovery theoretical account as taking ownership and duty for an unwellness and what can and ca n’t be done, concentrating on the strengths and issues instead than a diagnosing. This is a dependable beginning provided by the Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health. The recovery theoretical account will be discussed more in-depth in chapter three.

There is no uncertainty that the media plays a portion in reenforcing the attitudes towards

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay