The parallels between The Crucible and the Rwanda Genocide Essay Example

extremes far greater than expected and became a race murder. ensuing in the deceases of between 500 000-1 000 000 people. with 1000s and 1000s of viciously butchered cadavers littering the streets.

The motivation behind both events is retaliation. In The Crucible. Abigail ab initio uses the thought of witchery to salvage her ain tegument. she so realises that she can utilize it as alibi to seek retaliation on Elizabeth Proctor for disregarding her and destructing her relationship with John Proctor. Similarly. the Hutu’s seek retaliation on the Tutsi’s for hiting down their president. killing him and everyone else in the aeroplane. The Hutu’s believe the Tutsi’s were seeking to recover power. There was a long history of competition and force between these two folks and the violent death of the president was the accelerator ignited the rapacious fires of retaliation. The Hutu’s began their manhunt to happen and kill the Tutsi’s in retaliation for the old ages of sensed subjugation when the Tutsi’s ruled Rwanda.

Like John Proctor in The Crucible. there excessively is a supporter in the Rwanda Genocide – Paul Rusesabagina. They both display strength in standing up for what is right. they refuse to bewray their friends and they both show great bravery to make what is right. even if it means giving themselves. In The Crucible. as things start to acquire out of manus. John takes it on himself to stand up to the authorization and put things right. Even when standing up against the church places intuition on him. John will non compromise his beliefs and battles for what he believes is right. This is the same battle Paul Rusesabagina undertakes.

Paul refuses to fall into the force and hatred between the Hutu’s and Tutsi’s. He inquiries the thought that Hutu’s are better than Tutsi’s. He himself. a Hutu. is married to a Tutsi and he will non allow himself be threatened into altering his beliefs or into following what the other Hutu’s are making.

As a Hutu. Paul is expected to contemn the Tutsi’s and to be a portion of the force and the violent death. Alternatively he takes in the homeless. terrified Tutsi refugees and turned the hotel he was pull offing into a refugee cantonment. Paul knew that he and his household would be killed if the Hutu’s discovered what he was making. but he did non hesitation. He took them in. protected them and provided for them when no 1 else had the bravery to. He refused to bewray or abandon his household and friends or his people. He saved the lives of 1 268 refugees through his sheer strength. intelligence. doggedness and courage. Paul’s refusal to bewray his people to salvage himself is strikingly similar to John’s refusal to bewray his friends. Although his treachery would hold saved his life and allowed him to be with his household. he could non make it.

John’s refusal to bewray his friends leads to the ultimate forfeit. His concluding act of rebelliousness. to decline to be portion of something untruthful. finally led to his decease. This emphasises his strength of character and his huge bravery. Like John Proctor. Paul besides made forfeits and took great hazards. Paul sacrifices his place. his occupation. the safety of his household and was even willing to give his life to

salvage the lives of people he didn’t even know. but was willing to protect. He gave aid to anyone who needed it. Hutu or Tutsi. Both of these Acts of the Apostless of forfeit. from merely one person. led to the economy of many lives.

The subjects of justness. community and forfeit in The Crucible are cosmopolitan and timeless. The Crucible Teachs us about these subjects and Teachs us to place them in historical events. The groundless violent death of guiltless people merely because they belong to a certain group is repeated over and over in history along with how the bravery of one or many individual/s can take to the economy of multiple lives. There are ever persons in barbarous state of affairss who display tremendous bravery and humanity in standing up for what is right and non blindly following others ; persons who have the bravery to inquiry authorization.

The Crucible Teachs us that the bravery of one person can salvage the lives of many if they merely have the strength to inquiry and to stand up for what they believe. The Crucible Teachs us to place these subjects in existent life events. In add-on to the Rwanda Genocide. the relevancy of The Crucible is manifested in other recent state of affairss. we merely have to see school miss Malala Yousafzi who was shot in the caput by the Taliban after talking out and standing up for the right of misss to travel to school in Afghanistan. The subjects of justness. community and forfeit are apparent in The Crucible and The Crucible Teachs us to recognize them in existent life state of affairss and Teachs

us the importance of bravery and forfeit. and the great impact that one brave person can hold in a horrific and apparently hopeless state of affairs.