Research on Employee Performance Essay

essay A+
  • Words: 2381
  • Category: Database

  • Pages: 9

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

Research on Employee Performance

Undertaking Outline:

This research is about the Employee public presentation in an organisation. Data related to several factors such as Employee Productivity, Customer Satisfactions Scores, Accuracy Scores, Experience and Age of Employees is taken into consideration. Statistical methods are used to place if there is any impact of Age and Experience of Employees on factors such as Productivity, Customer Satisfaction and Accuracy.

Theoretical Model:

XYZ Corporation runing out of Illinois, US want to happen out if the age and experience of employees have an impact on his/her public presentation. They have hired an external adviser to analyze the impact of these two factors ( age and experience ) on the public presentation prosodies of the employees. Harmonizing to the consequences of the research conducted by this external adviser, XYZ Corporate will plan a scheme of enrolling the right endowment which will hold maximal public presentation.

Design and Methodology:

Design and Methodology used by the external adviser include placing the assorted public presentation factors common across different concerns within XYZ Corporation. The public presentation measures common for all concerns included:

  1. Customer Satisfaction Scores
  2. Accuracy Tonss
  3. Productiveness

The advisers decided to analyze the impact of age of employees and their experience on the above factors by utilizing statistical methods.

Detailss on participants and trying methods:

Sampling Methods:

Sampling is the procedure of choosing a little figure of elements from a larger defined mark group of elements. Population is the entire group of elements we want to analyze. Sample is the subgroup of the population we really study. Sample would intend a group of‘n’employees chosen indiscriminately from organisation of population‘N’ .Sampling is done in state of affairss like:

  • We sample when the procedure involves destructive testing, e.g. gustatory sensation trials, auto clang trials, etc.
  • We sample when there are restraints of clip and costs
  • We sample when the populations can non be easy captured

Sampling is NOT done in state of affairss like:

  • We can non try when the events and merchandises are alone and can non be replicable

Sampling can be done by utilizing several methods including: Simple random sampling, Stratified random sampling, Systematic sampling and Cluster trying. These are Probability Sampling Methods. Sampling can besides be done utilizing methods such as Convenience sampling, Judgment sampling, Quota sampling and Snowball sampling. These are non-probability methods of sampling.

Simple random tryingis a method of trying in which every unit has equal opportunity of being selected.Graded random tryingis a method of trying in which stratum/groups are created and so units are picked indiscriminately.Systematic samplingis a method of trying in which every NThursdayunit is selected from the population.Cluster sampling is a method of trying in which bunchs are sampled every TThursdayclip.

For the non-probability methods,Convenience samplingrelies upon convenience and entree.Judgment tryingrelies upon belief that participants fit features.Quota tryingemphasizes representation of specific features.Snowball samplingrelies upon answering referrals of others with like features.

In our research, the adviser organisation used a Simple Random Sampling method to carry on the survey where they chose about 75 random employees and gathered informations of age, experience, their Customer Satisfaction tonss, their Accuracy Tonss and their Productiveness tonss.

The employees were bifurcated into 3 age groups, viz. , 20 – 30 old ages, 30 – 40 old ages and 40 – 50 old ages. Similarly, they were besides bifurcated into 3 experience groups, viz. , 0 – 10 old ages, 10 – 20 old ages and 20 – 30 old ages.

Datas Analysis:

Below are the different informations analysis options used by the adviser:

  1. Impact of Age on Accuracy
  2. Impact of Experience on Accuracy
  3. Impact of Age on Customer Satisfaction
  4. Impact of Experience on Customer Satisfaction
  5. Impact of Age on Productivity
  6. Impact of Experience on Productivity

For each of the above statistical analysis, we will necessitate to utilize Hypothesis proving methods. Hypothesis proving Tells us whether there exists statistically important difference between the informations sets for us to see to stand for different distribution. The difference that can be detected utilizing hypothesis testing is:

  • Continuous Datas
    • Difference in Average
    • Difference in Variation
  • Discrete Data
    • Difference in Proportion Defective

We follow the below stairss for Hypothesis testing:

  • Measure 1: Determine appropriate Hypothesis trial
  • Measure 2: State the Null Hypothesis HOand Alternate Hypothesis Ha
  • Measure 3: Calculate Test Statistics / P-value against table value of trial statistic
  • Measure 4: Interpret consequences – Accept or reject HO

The mechanism of Hypothesis proving involves the followers:

  • HydrogenO= Null Hypothesis – There is No statistically important difference between the two groups
  • Ha = Alternate Hypothesis – There is statistically important difference between the two groups

We besides have different types of mistakes that can be caused if we are utilizing hypothesis testing. The mistakes are as celebrated below:

  • Type I Error – P ( Reject HOwhen HOis true ) = ?
  • Type II Error – Phosphorus ( Accept HOwhen HOis false ) = ?

P Value – Statistical Measure which indicates the chance of doing an ? mistake. The value ranges between 0 and 1. We usually work with 5 % alpha hazard, a P value lower than 0.05 agencies that we reject the Null hypothesis and accept alternate hypothesis.

Let’s speak a small about p-value. It is a Statistical Measure which indicates the chance of doing an ? mistake. The value ranges between 0 and 1. We usually work with 5 % alpha hazard. ? should be specified before the hypothesis trial is conducted. If the p-value is & A ; gt ; 0.05, so HOis true and there is no difference in the groups ( Accept HO) . If the p-value is & A ; lt ; 0.05, so Ho is false and there is a statistically important difference in the groups ( Reject Ho ) .

We will besides discourse about the types of hypothesis testing:

  • 1-Sample t-test:It’s used when we haveNormal Continuous Y and Discrete X.It is used for comparing a population mean against a given criterion. For illustration: Is the average Turn Around Time of thread i‚?15 proceedingss.
  • 2-Sample t-test:It’s used when we haveNormal Continuous Y and Discrete X.It is used for comparing agencies of two different populations. For illustration: Is the average public presentation of forenoon displacement = average public presentation of dark displacement.
  • Analysis of variance:It’s used when we haveNormal Continuous Y and Discrete X.It is used for comparing the agencies of more than two populations. For illustration: Is the average public presentation of staff A = average public presentation of staff B = average public presentation of staff C.
  • Homogeneity Of Discrepancy:It’s used when we haveNormal Continuous Y and Discrete X.It is used for comparing the discrepancy of two or more than two populations. For illustration: Is the fluctuation of staff A = fluctuation of staff B = fluctuation of staff C.
  • Mood’s Median Trial:It’s used when we haveNon-normal Continuous Y and Discrete X.It is used for Comparing the medians of two or more than two populations. For illustration: Is the median of staff A = median of staff B = median of staff C.
  • Simple Linear Arrested development:It’s used when we haveContinuous Y and Continuous X.It is used to see how end product ( Y ) changes as the input ( X ) alterations. For illustration: If we need to happen out how staff A’s truth is related to his figure of old ages spent in the procedure.
  • Chi-square Test of Independence:It’s used when we haveDiscrete Y and Discrete X.It is used to see how end product counts ( Y ) from two or more sub-groups ( X ) differ. For illustration: If we want to happen out whether defects from forenoon displacement are significantly different from defects in the eventide displacement.

Let’s expression at each of the analysis for our research:

Impact of Age on Accuracy

Practical Problem

Hypothesis

Statistical Tool Used

Decision

Is Accuracy impacted by Age of Employees

Hydrogen0: Accuracy is independent of the Age of Employees

Hydrogen1: Accuracy is impacted by Age of Employees

One-way ANOVA

p-value & A ; lt ; 0.05 indicates that public presentation step of truth is impacted by age factor

One-way ANOVA: Accuracy versus Age Bucket

Beginning DF SS MS F P

Age Bucket 2 0.50616 0.25308 67.62 0.000

Mistake 72 0.26946 0.00374

Entire 74 0.77562

S = 0.06118 R-Sq = 65.26 % R-Sq ( adj ) = 64.29 %

Individual 95 % CIs For Mean Based on

Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev — — — + — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — –

20 – 30 old ages 26 0.75448 0.06376 ( — -* — )

30 – 40 old ages 26 0.85078 0.07069 ( — -* — )

40 – 50 old ages 23 0.95813 0.04416 ( — -* — – )

— — — + — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — –

0.770 0.840 0.910 0.980

Pooled StDev = 0.06118

Boxplot of Accuracy by Age Bucket

Decision: P-value of the above analysis & A ; lt ; 0.05 which indicates that we reject the void hypothesis and therefore, the public presentation step of truth is impacted by age of employees. As the age additions, we observe that the truth of the employees besides increases.

Impact of Experience on Accuracy

Practical Problem

Hypothesis

Statistical Tool Used

Decision

Is Accuracy impacted by Experience of Employees

Hydrogen0: Accuracy is independent of the Experience of Employees

Hydrogen1: Accuracy is impacted by Experience of Employees

One-way ANOVA

p-value & A ; lt ; 0.05 indicates that public presentation step of truth is impacted by experience factor

One-way ANOVA: Accuracy versus Experience Bucket

Beginning DF SS MS F P

Experience Bucke 2 0.53371 0.26685 79.42 0.000

Mistake 72 0.24191 0.00336

Entire 74 0.77562

S = 0.05796 R-Sq = 68.81 % R-Sq ( adj ) = 67.94 %

Individual 95 % CIs For Mean Based on

Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev — — — -+ — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — — — — -+ —

0 – 10 old ages 24 0.74403 0.05069 ( — * — – )

10 – 20 old ages 23 0.84357 0.05354 ( — -* — )

20 – 30 old ages 28 0.94696 0.06660 ( — * — )

— — — -+ — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — — — — -+ —

0.770 0.840 0.910 0.980

Pooled StDev = 0.05796

Boxplot of Accuracy by Experience Bucket

Decision: P-value of the above analysis & A ; lt ; 0.05 which indicates that we reject the void hypothesis and therefore, the public presentation step of truth is impacted by experience of employees. As the experience additions, we observe that the truth of the employees besides increases.

Impact of Age on Customer Satisfaction

Practical Problem

Hypothesis

Statistical Tool Used

Decision

Is Customer Satisfaction Score impacted by Age of Employees

Hydrogen0: Customer Satisfaction Score is independent of the Age of Employees

Hydrogen1: Customer Satisfaction Score is impacted by Age of Employees

One-way ANOVA

p-value & A ; lt ; 0.05 indicates that public presentation step of Customer Satisfaction mark is impacted by age factor

One-way ANOVA: Customer Satisfaction versus Age Bucket

Beginning DF SS MS F P

Age Bucket 2 49.51 24.75 18.92 0.000

Mistake 72 94.23 1.31

Entire 74 143.74

S = 1.144 R-Sq = 34.44 % R-Sq ( adj ) = 32.62 %

Individual 95 % CIs For Mean Based on

Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — — — — -+

20 – 30 old ages 26 6.906 1.164 ( — — * — — – )

30 – 40 old ages 26 8.041 1.156 ( — — -* — — )

40 – 50 old ages 23 8.907 1.107 ( — — -* — — – )

— — — — -+ — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — — — — -+

7.20 8.00 8.80 9.60

Pooled StDev = 1.144

Boxplot of Customer Satisfaction by Age Bucket

Decision: P-value of the above analysis & A ; lt ; 0.05 which indicates that we reject the void hypothesis and therefore, the public presentation step of Customer Satisfaction Score is impacted by age of employees. As the age additions, we observe that the Customer Satisfaction Score of the employees besides increases.

Impact of Experience on Customer Satisfaction

Practical Problem

Hypothesis

Statistical Tool Used

Decision

Is Customer Satisfaction Score impacted by Experience of Employees

Hydrogen0: Customer Satisfaction Score is independent of the Experience of Employees

Hydrogen1: Customer Satisfaction Score is impacted by Experience of Employees

One-way ANOVA

p-value & A ; lt ; 0.05 indicates that public presentation step of Customer Satisfaction mark is impacted by experience factor

One-way ANOVA: Customer Satisfaction versus Experience Bucket

Beginning DF SS MS F P

Experience Bucke 2 51.20 25.60 19.92 0.000

Mistake 72 92.54 1.29

Entire 74 143.74

S = 1.134 R-Sq = 35.62 % R-Sq ( adj ) = 33.83 %

Individual 95 % CIs For Mean Based on

Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev — — — — + — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — — — — -+-

0 – 10 old ages 24 7.035 1.277 ( — — -* — — – )

10 – 20 old ages 23 7.570 0.922 ( — — -* — — – )

20 – 30 old ages 28 8.948 1.160 ( — — * — — )

— — — — + — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — — — — -+-

7.20 8.00 8.80 9.60

Pooled StDev = 1.134

Boxplot of Customer Satisfaction by Experience Bucket

Decision: P-value of the above analysis & A ; lt ; 0.05 which indicates that we reject the void hypothesis and therefore, the public presentation step of Customer Satisfaction Score is impacted by experience of employees. As the experience additions, we observe that the Customer Satisfaction Score of the employees besides increases.

Impact of Age on Productivity

Practical Problem

Hypothesis

Statistical Tool Used

Decision

Is Productivity impacted by Age of Employees

Hydrogen0: Productiveness is independent of the Age of Employees

Hydrogen1: Productiveness is impacted by Age of Employees

One-way ANOVA

p-value & A ; lt ; 0.05 indicates that public presentation step of Productivity is impacted by experience factor

One-way ANOVA: Productivity versus Age Bucket

Beginning DF SS MS F P

Age Bucket 2 0.74389 0.37194 194.56 0.000

Mistake 72 0.13765 0.00191

Entire 74 0.88153

S = 0.04372 R-Sq = 84.39 % R-Sq ( adj ) = 83.95 %

Individual 95 % CIs For Mean Based on

Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev — — — + — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — –

20 – 30 old ages 26 0.93959 0.04287 ( -* — )

30 – 40 old ages 26 0.81511 0.05831 ( -*- )

40 – 50 old ages 23 0.69291 0.01747 ( — *- )

— — — + — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — –

0.720 0.800 0.880 0.960

Pooled StDev = 0.04372

Boxplot of Productivity by Age Bucket

Decision: P-value of the above analysis & A ; lt ; 0.05 which indicates that we reject the void hypothesis and therefore, the public presentation step of Productivity is impacted by age of employees. As the age additions, we observe that the Productivity of the employees lessenings.

Impact of Experience on Productivity

Practical Problem

Hypothesis

Statistical Tool Used

Decision

Is Productivity impacted by Experience of Employees

Hydrogen0: Productiveness is independent of the Experience of Employees

Hydrogen1: Productiveness is impacted by Experience of Employees

One-way ANOVA

p-value & A ; lt ; 0.05 indicates that public presentation step of Productivity is impacted by experience factor

One-way ANOVA: Productivity versus Experience Bucket

Beginning DF SS MS F P

Experience Bucke 2 0.74024 0.37012 188.61 0.000

Mistake 72 0.14129 0.00196

Entire 74 0.88153

S = 0.04430 R-Sq = 83.97 % R-Sq ( adj ) = 83.53 %

Individual 95 % CIs For Mean Based on

Pooled StDev

Level N Mean StDev — + — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — — — –

0 – 10 old ages 24 0.94474 0.03139 ( — * — )

10 – 20 old ages 23 0.83120 0.05754 ( — *- )

20 – 30 old ages 28 0.70599 0.04118 ( — *- )

— + — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — — — — -+ — — — –

0.700 0.770 0.840 0.910

Pooled StDev = 0.04430

Boxplot of Productivity by Experience Bucket

Decision: P-value of the above analysis & A ; lt ; 0.05 which indicates that we reject the void hypothesis and therefore, the public presentation step of Productivity is impacted by experience of employees. As the experience additions, we observe that the Productivity of the employees lessenings.

Decision of the Analysis:

  1. As Age and Experience additions, the Accuracy and Customer Satisfaction Scores of Employees additions
  2. As Age and Experience additions, the Productivity of Employees lessenings

Bibliography:

The informations used in this analysis is self-created informations utilizing statistical package.

Research Schedule ( Gantt Chart ) of the Undertaking:

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member
unlock