Management: Research Design Conclusion Essay Example

the paper is aimed at, encompassing age range, beliefs, attitudes, racial profile, or any other distinguishing feature. Managers must be careful to avoid biased information that excessively favors a particular religious or political group.

It is important to avoid other sources that are written to entertain school aged children, as these sources may be tainted and not useful for managers in making decisions. Additionally, the format of the source should be evaluated, including factors such as the ease of finding information, the appeal of the design, and the helpfulness of the help section (Cooper, 2011). Researchers and managers should also steer clear of sources that present information in a confusing manner, make it hard to find information, or are not helpful. These types of sources only waste the time of the researcher and manager.

To ensure they have accurate and reliable information, managers must evaluate sources for false or biased content and unverified information. They need trustworthy data that is timely and can be utilized to make informed decisions. When faced with dilemmas, managers often search through the vast amount of internet information.

The internet offers a vast amount of information on almost any topic. However, its real worth is in the capability to determine how useful it is for decision making. To achieve this, decision makers and researchers need to assess the credibility and purpose of sources, thereby improving decision making by eliminating untrustworthy information.

In a secondary search, researchers must understand the differences between primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. The choice between these sources depends on the research question at hand. Primary sources involve collecting new data, while secondary sources involve finding existing

information. When using the primary research approach, researchers create their own data, whereas the secondary approach involves searching for existing data. It is crucial for researchers to have knowledge of the various search types and how to collect them.

In order to meet their research requirements, researchers learn how to access the necessary information. Primary sources encompass various materials such as court rulings, regulations, laws, memos, letters, complete interviews or speeches, and much of the government data. These sources provide information in its original form without any additional interpretation. Conversely, secondary data refers to the interpretation of primary data.

Secondary data sources include encyclopedias, textbooks, magazines, newspaper articles, and newscasts (Cooper, 2011). These sources present information that has been interpreted by another party, making it secondary. This means that the information is no longer original but is presented through a secondary source. On the other hand, tertiary sources are interpretations of secondary research and include indexes, bibliographies, and other finding aids (Cooper, 2011). They consist of a collection of primary and secondary research.

Researchers have various options for finding primary and secondary research sources, such as guidebooks, manuals, and directories. The secondary search approach involves exploring existing primary, secondary, and tertiary information. By adopting this approach, researchers acquire both pre-existing primary information and secondary information. Consequently, they are able to collect primary data without having to conduct surveys or interviews; rather, they rely on the findings derived from existing primary sources.

Both primary and secondary approaches are employed for information gathering. The primary approach entails generating new data to address the research question, while the secondary approach utilizes existing data. Primary data is produced through

original research, whereas the secondary approach offers a more cost and time-efficient option for researchers. The selection of the research method depends on the particular research question being tackled.

When researchers use secondary data, they face numerous issues that affect its quality. Consequently, it becomes essential for them to find solutions to address these challenges.

Ensuring the reliability of secondary data and developing skills to identify unreliable information are crucial tasks for researchers. Authentication and verification of data present challenges that require examining source credentials and understanding the intentions behind the information. While finding secondary research is simple, assessing its credibility and usefulness can be difficult. The internet provides numerous sources like blogs, news articles, and published work copies; however, caution must be exercised as some authors may possess expertise but write with bias.

It is challenging for managers to differentiate between information published online, whether it was written by a ninth grader as a school project or if it holds any scholarly value. Along with verifying the validity of the information, researchers also have to find quality information in terms of depth and format. Occasionally, the information may be verified but lacks sufficient depth or enough quality content for researchers to utilize. In other instances, the source may be outdated or leave unanswered questions.

The issue of presenting data in a confusing or hard-to-find manner also contributes to the difficulty in finding quality secondary research. To help researchers distinguish meaningful data from meaningless data, the five point evaluation process has been implemented. If researchers do not have access to private libraries of scholarly information, finding quality secondary research is not always easy. When researchers

are left to their own devices, they encounter a large amount of secondary information from various sources that all need verification. However, trained researchers can efficiently scan through information and have a better ability to identify quality information.