Legal and Ethical Considerations of Employee Monitoring Essay Example
In today’s electronic age, many employers are faced daunting task of making a legal call when determining if monitoring employee behavior is appropriate at all times. In essence, “Little Brother” is always watching. According to Schulman (2013), Little Brother represents the tremendous capabilities technology as provided for employers to keep track of what their work force is up to. Several programs are available that search e-mails, as well as software to block objectionable websites.
The most brazen of manager and supervisors can simply go enter your hard drive and review one’s cookies and history, as well as access any employee’s company e-mail. As much as an employee deletes his/her history, or sends unwanted emails to the recycle bin, much of this information still exists on the company server, and many corporations are willing to pay computer consultants to unearth any desired infor
...mation.
When it comes to e-mails, a survey completed by the Society of Human Resource Management found that of the companies surveyed, over 36 percent searched employee messages. What is Employee Monitoring? The U. S. Office of Technology Assessment defines computerized performance monitoring as “the computerized collection, storage, analysis, and reporting of information about employees’ productive activities” (Yerby, 2013; Peters, 2009).
Unfortunately there is a muddied area when it comes to this matter because current laws state that monitoring is legal, however the question of whether this practice is effective or ethically sound is constantly raised. Some believe that when the focus begins to narrows to micromanaging employees, the firm cannot effectively run a competitive business, therefore employees accountability and transparency is pushed in many work environments, however many
employers view this situation quite differently.
Many employers feel that sensitive company information might be at risk from the abuse of the fairly new, yet constantly progressing medium. Today, nearly 70 percent of workers have access to a computer, with approximate 85% having internet access. With computers being so readily available to such a wide variety of workers with a diverse sense of work ethics, knowledge and varying intentions, employers feel forced to monitor the activities of their employees.
As email and the internet have become a major part of most workers’ routine, many are using business resources for personal tasks. Therefore employee monitoring in many cases is there to protect the business from legal liability, as well as to produce a more efficient employee. There are numerous software and hardware solutions available to monitor different activities, and the price of monitoring or surveillance software ranges from free to several thousand dollars. Many packages and monitor several items such as:
- Keystrokes typed.
- Application and website usage.
- Detailed file usage.
- Incoming and outgoing chats and emails.
- Internet connections.
- Windows interacted with.
- Internet packet data.
- Desktop screenshots.
- Software installations (Yerby, 2013).
It is important to also note that many employers also use telephone and video monitoring as well. When it comes to monitoring employees, there are several questions that need to be answered: What should they be restricted to monitoring? Should employees be notified that are being monitored? Unfortunately, if a business owner does nothing to stop counterproductive activities, the owner may not be able to stay in
business. Giving employees open unmonitored, computer access will cause productivity and efficiency to ultimately suffer.
Corporations must educate their employees, letting them know what monitoring is, what it will monitor and convey the message this is not to invade employee privacy, but to protect the company and its interests. Many legal experts state it is best for businesses to make sure employees understand that no electronic communication is private. What the Law Says The type of employer may determine which laws could potentially protect employees.
The Fourth Amendment may protect and employee of a government entity, however any employer that has a union agreement, the National Labor Relations Act and the union contract may protect the employees privacy. Unfortunately, current laws do not clearly note that monitoring employees is against the law, as we know many companies have used information gained from monitoring workers as evidence in court cases. It has been found that email and internet evidence has been critical in many lawsuits, including discrimination and trade secret theft.
Lastly, business face legal issues when it must determine if it is obligated to monitor in order maintain a safe, non-hostile work environment for its employees, according to recent survey, 68% of employers cite legal liability as their motivation. As aforementioned, most laws governing employees depends on the employment relationship; therefore most private employees have no right to privacy. Ethical Issues Not only are there a plethora of legal issues involved in the monitoring of employees, there are numerous ethical situations to boot.
According to Yerby (2013), some of the ethical issues involve downloading pornography, creating personal web pages on company
owned machines, or displaying offensive images on computer monitors. Many workers have used many hours of corporate time shopping, gambling, playing games, or sending personal messages. Companies that monitor keystrokes may assume that when keystrokes slow down or stop for what may be considered to be an excessive amount of time, an employee may be considered off task. Conclusion In the eyes of the employer, there are many positive aspects to employee monitoring.
Businesses must make every attempt to carefully plan who they monitor, how they will monitor who will do the monitoring, but employers need to have a program in place to ensure productivity and limit the risk of legal liability. Human resources departments must draft a computer usage policy needs a clear statement that stresses that employees should not expect privacy with anything put on the company network. Maintaining a safe and productive workplace require an organization to keep a watchful eye on employee activities which could bring harm to employees or create a legal or financial liability for the company.
- Career Choice essays
- Career Goals essays
- Career Plan essays
- Community Service essays
- Dream Job essays
- Duty essays
- Employee essays
- Internship essays
- Interview essays
- Job essays
- Job Interview essays
- Performance Appraisal essays
- Portfolio essays
- Service essays
- Skills essays
- Vocation essays
- Work Experience essays
- Work-Life Balance essays
- American Dream essays
- Barriers To Entry essays
- Capitalism essays
- Central Bank essays
- Compensation essays
- Consumerism essays
- Economic Development essays
- Economic Growth essays
- Economic Inequality essays
- Economic System essays
- Economy essays
- Employment essays
- Export essays
- Finance essays
- Free Trade essays
- Gross Domestic Product essays
- Human Development essays
- Income Inequality essays
- Industry essays
- Inflation essays
- International Business essays
- International Trade essays
- Macroeconomics essays
- Materialism essays
- Max Weber essays
- Microeconomics essays
- Minimum Wage essays
- Monetary Policy essays
- Monopoly essays
- Pricing essays
- Profit essays
- Recession essays