Religion and politics set the Spanish settlements and English colonies apart during the seventeenth century. The Spanish predominantly followed Catholicism, while the English colonies held diverse religious beliefs. Furthermore, the Spanish settlements operated under monarchies, while the political structure in the English colonies varied.
The daily lives of the colonists were less controlled by religion compared to the overwhelming control exerted by the dominant Puritan religion in England. Although they left England due to religious persecution, they ironically ended up persecuting others within their own society, such as Anne Hutchinson. In contrast, the Spanish had a monarchy system in politics and slavery played a significant role in their society, as seen in their La Comida system that ensured food for everyone. They had good relations with the Indians and approved of interracial marriages between whites and Indians. The Conquist
...adors were responsible for establishing colonies that formed an empire larger than today's US territory but lacked self-government. Upon gaining independence in the early 1800s, they struggled with governing and fell under military dictatorships.
In terms of English politics, remnants of a monarchy persisted while gradually moving towards self-government through initiatives like town meetings and a stronger sense of civic duty. Unlike the Spanish, the English did not practice slavery and remained under British rule.
When examining the cultural and economic responses of the British, French, and Spanish to Native Americans before 1750s, it is clear that both the British and French took different approaches in their relations with Indians both economically and culturally.
Although there was mutual mistrust between the French and British towards the Indians, as well as from the Indians towards the newcomers on "floating islands with many
tall trees", they still had daily interactions. The French and British approached their economic and cultural interactions with Native Americans differently. Historical evidence, including firsthand accounts, documents, and observations by historians, clearly indicates that the British and French had distinct approaches in their dealings with Native Americans in North America. During the early stages of exploration, both nations initially enjoyed positive relationships with the Indians due to the economic benefits obtained through cooperation. The fur trade with Native Americans quickly flourished because of its high profitability when sold in Europe.
Years later, the economic goals shifted, as did the relations with the Native Americans. Samuel de Champlain, leading the French, established a fur trading network in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence regions. With the aim of improving relations, the French sought to ally with the Huron Indians in that area. This relationship progressed to the point where the French assisted the Hurons in their conflict against the Iroquois Confederacy, forming an alliance. Champlain's success with the Indians led him to dispatch traders to live among the Hurons, embracing their culture and language, while also monitoring fur trade in the newly settled Quebec. Additionally, the export of crops proved less profitable for the French compared to fur trade, as it only began due to Native Americans teaching them farming techniques.
Despite encountering some problems, the French established a mutually advantageous economic alliance with the Indians. In contrast, British colonization faced a delayed commencement due to their conflict with Spain. However, they swiftly capitalized on the economic benefits offered by the new world. Jamestown, situated in present-day Virginia, emerged as one of the early noteworthy English settlements in
this region. It was during this period that they encountered the vast empire of Algonquian tribes.
Despite their initial hesitancy towards the Spanish due to a negative encounter, the Algonquian leaders reluctantly welcomed the English, hoping for advantageous trade and assistance during times of conflict. However, the British had different motives, resulting in an early war. The British emerged triumphant, enabling the flourishing of Jamestown colony. This led to a tobacco-centered agricultural boom. Over time, the British settlers became covetous and sought after the Indians' land, despite their absence of belief in land ownership. Consequently, this ignited a war between the two factions.
This pattern of amicable beginnings and subsequent conflicts between the Indians and English was commonly observed in the new world. However, the British were economically successful like the French, albeit through different means. The cultural interactions between the French and British with the Indians progressed similarly as it was closely tied to their economic interactions.
The French are recognized for their "frontiers of inclusion," wherein they commonly resided alongside Native Americans in mixed communities. Conversely, the British implemented an "exclusion" policy that maintained a separation between Europeans and Native Americans. In the initial stages of French colonization, the majority of settlers were males. Consequently, numerous mixed-race communities and relationships between Europeans and Native Americans formed due to limited migration to the colonies. This led to the emergence of a new racial group with both European and North American Indian ancestry. Such an inclusive attitude towards Native Americans contributed to fostering positive relations during the period of colonization.
The British had a different approach to Native American relations compared to the French. They pursued a policy of
separating the communities, believing in the superiority of the British over the "savage" Indians. This belief was reinforced when the cultures mixed. The English viewed the Indian policy of sharing land as primitive and failed to appreciate its advantages. They also saw the native people's religious beliefs as a sign of lack of intelligence, considering that many settlers were influenced by the enlightenment era in Europe when religious ideas were challenged by science.
Through the growth of the colonies, the exclusion by the British developed into a complex relationship with the Native Americans, impacting future decades and centuries. France and Britain both heavily invested resources and manpower in colonizing the new world, reaping the benefits of North America. However, had the American Indians not been present during the arrival of the first explorers, the continent's and nation's history would have markedly diverged. The British and French approaches to coexistence with Native Americans differed to such an extent that they can be seen as opposite.
- Victorian Era essays
- Henry v essays
- Stonehenge essays
- 1920S essays
- 1950S essays
- 1960S essays
- 19Th Century essays
- 20Th Century essays
- Ancient Greece essays
- Bravery essays
- British Empire essays
- Civilization essays
- Colonialism essays
- Declaration of Independence essays
- Evidence essays
- Genocide essays
- Gilded Age essays
- Historical Figures essays
- Historiography essays
- History of the United States essays
- Letter from Birmingham Jail essays
- Louisiana Purchase essays
- Nazi Germany essays
- Rebellion essays
- Revolution essays
- Roman Empire essays
- Russian Empire essays
- The Columbian Exchange essays
- Vikings essays
- War essays
- What is History essays
- World History essays
- World Hunger essays
- John Locke essays
- 9/11 essays
- A Good Teacher essays
- A Healthy Diet essays
- A Modest Proposal essays
- A&P essays
- Academic Achievement essays
- Achievement essays
- Achieving goals essays
- Admission essays
- Advantages And Disadvantages Of Internet essays
- Alcoholic drinks essays
- Ammonia essays
- Analytical essays
- Ancient Olympic Games essays
- APA essays
- Arabian Peninsula essays