Votes for Women Analysis Essay Example
Votes for Women Analysis Essay Example

Votes for Women Analysis Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 15 (4018 words)
  • Published: November 11, 2017
  • Type: Essay
View Entire Sample
Text preview

Source A implies that the reasons given by the Suffragettes demanding votes for women are that firstly, women were very angry that the Conciliation Bill did not include the right to vote for women, but the Bill included many things for men. Source A was by the Suffragettes, who were a group of women fighting for women suffrage using militant techniques.

This group of women produced the poster shown in Source A in 1912, when the third Conciliation Bill was yet again shelved like the second Bill. As a result of this incident, the poster shown in Source A was produced as to why women could get the vote.The poster, as it clearly shows, is one sided, so this was used as propaganda. The point of this poster is that women are comparing themselves to men, as they have the vote, but are

...

showing women doing much more important jobs than men. The comparison shows that women are responsible, and men are irresponsible. The poster says that women are caring and responsible.

For example, on the poster, it shows a woman who is a doctor or teacher. This shows that women were educated, intelligent and helpful. There is also a mother, which shows that she is nurturing, kind and caring.These characteristics show that women are responsible and can think for themselves.

The poster also shows that women have achieved much more than men in the poster, and are still being denied the right to vote, which makes the Suffragettes even angrier than they were before. Women have also progressed a long way since the 1850s. The poster says that men are very irresponsible and that

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

they are useless. For example, it shows a man who is a convict. This shows that men are, evil and dangerous. The poster also shows a man who is a proprietor of white slaves, which shows that he is greedy, exploit and corrupt.

These characteristics show that men are very useless in the community, and that they are taking from the community, not giving like women. Overall, Source A is telling us that women had progressed much more than they were before, and that they were as, or more, responsible than men. The Source is also trying to tell us that women were intelligent, compared to the useless men shown on the poster. This Source tells us that women were really frustrated and annoyed about being denied the right to vote. On the one hand, Source C agrees with A because they are both types of propaganda posters, and they both promote their views.

Inadvertently, Source C and A agree because the poster of Source C shows house that is in a mess, and all of this is mainly because a woman is not there to do the jobs that are meant to be done by a woman. However, Source C disagrees with Source A because Source A shows women that are responsible, and Source C shows women that are irresponsible. Another reason as to why Sources C and A disagree is that both of the Sources differ on the actual message that they are trying to give out to the public. If you look closely at Source C, you can see a poster saying Votes for Women, and underneath this, it says "back in an hour

or so".This is trying to show that women are not caring for their family and that she has not come back in an hour as the candle has finished and burnt out. On the floor, you can see a little girl lying there with her doll, and this means that the little girl sleeps on the floor like a dog, so her mother does not care for her.

On the table you can see a young girl tired from trying to take on the mother's job, and you can see that her socks has holes in them, yet again, this is showing that the mother does not care for her children.Inadvertently, however, it is showing that women are very important; if a woman is not there to do her job, then everything in the house goes wrong. This shows that a woman is very important in everyday life. In conclusion, I think that Sources A and C do not agree as they are made by two opposition, but unintentionally, Source C does agree with Source A because it shows a women's job is really important. On the other hand, Source C agrees with Source B because they are both against woman suffrage.

Source B is saying women would take over, as there are more women than men, 1. 3 million women, and this would lead to a long term effect.The men would fear this, as they fear change. Both of the Sources agree that there would be negative changes. Source C says that the home has transformed into a disaster.

However, Source C does not agree with Source B because Source C shows a more

drastic attack onto opposition to women getting the vote. Source B is talking about women not being able to be trusted, as, if they get the vote, they would just vote for the people who are good looking or something along those lines. Source C shows that women cannot deal with politics and that they should stick with their traditional role.The Source also shows that women would do anything to gain the right to vote.

In conclusion, Source B was written by women who put forward a reasoned argument, Source C is a cartoon by a man who is writing to arouse public attention. Using my own knowledge, I am going to start off with telling you some back ground information about the Suffragists and the Suffragette. The Suffragists were a peaceful group of women that was led by Millicent Fawcett. The Suffragists were a peaceful group who used peaceful methods. The Suffragists are originally called the NUWSS, and they were one big group of women that had joined from all around the UK.They actually campaigned 72 years before they had finally gained the vote.

The Suffragettes, originally known as the WSPU and led by Emeline Pankhurst, were a group of women who used militant techniques to try and win the right to vote. At first, these women were not militant, but were peaceful, but then they turned militant, and then they turned violent. From 1903 - 1906, the Suffragettes were using peaceful techniques to put pressure on to the sympathetic MPs. In 1906 - 1912 however, the Suffragettes decided to use militant techniques, as they were denied the right to vote by the MPs

that they had been supporting.Form 1912 - 1914, the Suffragettes turned violent. By using the Sources and my own knowledge, I know that the ways in which women tried to win the vote in the year before the outbreak of the First World War is that women tried to do many extreme stunts.

As shown in Source E, it shows Emily Davison, a Suffragette that jumped in front of a horse dead. This proves that women tried extreme things to try and win the vote. Source D, an extract from Emeline Pankhurst's book, says that women were only using violent methods because they wanted to make women's suffrage a matter of news.From my own knowledge, I know that for a while, women's suffrage was not a matter of news, as for a while, there were problems with the House of Lords and the Irish trying to gain Independence. From this evidence, I know that the Suffragettes had difficulty to get into the headlines again and got more violent. Source D quotes the "we called upon the government" in past tense.

This means that the Suffragettes tried peacefully cooperation with the government so they gave up and now "we will fight for our cause".This means that the Suffragettes would fight militantly and violently for their cause to get the right to vote. Using my own knowledge, I know that the Suffragettes did fight violently from 1912 onwards to 1914. The extract of the book, written in 1912, was actually part of a speech, so it must have been said before 1912 and thus leading to the evidence that the Suffragettes did use violent techniques. The extract

also says that the Suffragist campaign did not work to give women the vote, even if it did make many people come on their side.Using my own knowledge, I know that the Suffragist campaign did not work, but neither did the Suffragette campaign, as neither had the vote after a long time of campaigning, but only after World War One.

Studying Source E, I can see a photograph of the Epsom Derby Race in 1913. I can see that Emily Davison is on the floor and so are the King's horse, Anmer, and a jockey. From just looking at the picture, I can see that the woman has jumped in front of the horse and that she is now on the floor. From my own knowledge, I know that she actually died of internal wounds.She also had a return ticket home, so I know that she did not intend to die, but to just stop the horse. I can also see that women would do anything to just show how much that they do want the vote.

The fact that Emily Davison dying was only taken in as that she being a martyr. This is when someone dies for the cause that they were fighting for before they die. This shows that the Suffragettes used very extreme methods to make people see how extreme they would go to actually win their cause. In conclusion, I think that both of the sources show us how extreme women would go into trying to win the vote.

Source D showing that women were violent and Source E showing that women were very extreme. Overall the Sources are trying to

show; entrenched views of opposition, Suffragette activity had alienated political supporters, government intransigence. Source F is useful to us as evidence for the contribution of women to the war effort as it is a poster produced in 1916, the year of conscription. The poster is showing us how women got were getting themselves involved in the war, particularly munitions. The poster shows a woman looking glamorous, but it not showing how dangerous working in a munitions factory can be.

For example, it is dangerous because of TNT poisoning. This is when your skin turns yellow and the chemical in the TNT poisons you. Source F also says "On her their lives depend", this means that the men fighting in the war were depending on the women who were working in munitions factories to help supply them to fight the war and win. However, it is limited to us as evidence for the contribution of women to the war effort because it is not showing us the whole picture.

Source F was used as propaganda in the war, as it is not showing everything that is actually happening to the women who were taking over the men's jobs.Using my own knowledge, I know that the women were very tired and did not have good conditions to work in the factories. Using my own knowledge, I also know that over 400 women died of TNT poisoning during the First World War. Source F is also not useful s it is showing a woman looking glamorous, after a day's work at a munitions factory. From my own knowledge, I know that working in a munitions factory would not be

this easy; it was very different compared to the easy jobs that women used to do before the war.On the other hand, Source G is useful because all the figures have increased, showing the change of attitude of women towards the war.

From looking at the source, it is clear that all the figures have increased, which shows that women have participated in all of the jobs that the men had left, so that they could go on and volunteer for the war. Source G is also useful because it is showing us statistics, not a poster, where it would say "enrol now". This shows that the Source is actually useful, as it is showing us the real statistics. However, on the other hand, Source G is not useful because it is from a school textbook.This means that the figures would have been simplified; rounded up or down. The Source is also not useful because it is not showing us what is happening between 1914 and 1918, is the rise steady or sudden? Source G is also not useful as it is not showing us what the women were actually doing, but they are showing us how many women are working.

The Source is also limited because it is not showing us how many men are doing the jobs as well, so you cannot compare them with each other. Another reason why Source G is limited is because it is not showing us what is happening after the war, only what is happening during the war.Did the women keep their jobs after the war, or did they leave and carry on as normal. In conclusion,

I think that Sources F and G are not that useful to us now because Source F is just a propaganda poster, you do not know how many women actually applied for the job. Source G is a table with figures from a school textbook, which could have been simplified, and you do not know many things that you may need to know to compare everything. 'It was the work that women did during the war that earned them the vote.

' Use the sources, and your own knowledge, to explain whether you agree with this interpretation.In this essay, I am going to explain to you if I agree with the interpretation that women were given the right to vote because of the work that they did during the war. In my opinion, I do not think that they did get the vote because of the work that they did during the war, not the contribution to the war effort. However, in this essay, I am going to give you a two sided argument as to whether I agree or not with the interpretation above. World War One provided women many opportunities to try and get the vote. Women could now take the jobs that the men had left, so that they could go and join in fighting the war.

After the war, women over the age of 30 were given the right to vote. But this was not only because of the war, as women had been fighting for the right to vote many years before. On the one hand, I agree with the interpretation that women had gained the right to vote because of

the work that they had done during the First World War because women had only gotten the vote after the War. From the beginning of the First World War, women had not campaigned for the right to vote, but the right to work for the country.

From my own knowledge, I know that women had campaigned for the "right to serve" in front of Whitehall. When the women done this, the Minister for Munitions, David Lloyd George, saw this as an opportunity and employed the women, as munitions on the Western Front was running short. Many women were now being employed throughout the country. Another reason as to why I agree with the interpretation is because women did work that men had done previously. Women did not only contribute to the war effort, but done work that was very difficult, for example, munitions factories.

From F, we know that women did the work that men had done because it is a poster of a woman working in a munitions factory. The poster was clearly used as propaganda, as, from my own knowledge, the poster does not show the bad effects of munitions factories, for example, TNT poisoning. By using Source G, I know that there were around 104, 000 women working in chemical factories, such as munitions factories in the time period of July 1918, and only 40, 000 working in chemical industries in the time period of July 1914. This shows a massive increase in figures, (64,000).

There are also many other figures, but the one that has increased the most metal industries, as many of these were needed to help fight in the war and win

the war. The one that has increased the least is Food, Drink and tobacco, this is mainly due to the fact that these are more 'womanly' job and are easier than 'manly' jobs. In the last paragraph of Source H, it says that the age limit of 30 was agreed for women to vote. From the interpretation, if it was because of the work that the women had done during the war, then all women would have gotten the right to vote, not only women over 30.This age limit was agreed because most women would have been married, and thus, more likely to vote for who their husband votes for.

People still thought as women not being equal to men, because if women were not married and had the vote, then they would just go and vote for the one that helped domestic work or for the person that is most good looking. Because of this, only older, more responsible women had been given the right. In my opinion, I think that it is not because the women were older, but because they would mainly listen to what their husband has to say, therefore, vote for the same person as her husband.As Source J quotes, "they have contributed to every service during this war, except that of fighting".

This means that Herbert Asquith is saying that women have done a lot of jobs during the war, and so he thinks that they should have been given the vote. In my opinion, I think that Asquith is saying that women should be given the vote because women had done the jobs that were most important, for

example, making munitions to help at the Western Front, and going near the scenes of war and helping injured soldiers.Overall, I think that women did get the right to vote because of the work that they had done during the war because they had not got the vote before this time. Women had been campaigning 82 years before they had actually gotten the right to vote, and they had only gotten the right to vote after the war. This clearly shows that it is because of the work that women did during the war, not anything before that.

On the other hand, I disagree with the interpretation that women had got the right to vote because of the work that they done because there were many other reasons.From Source A, you can see a poster, which has a row with women saying; "What a woman may be and yet not get the vote". The second row has a row with pictures of men in it saying; "What a man may be, and yet not lose the vote". The first row, with the women, shows that women were very capable, as they had jobs like mayors and doctors in 1912. The first row also shows how women had developed throughout the times, and how responsible they are.

The second row however, shows men who are irresponsible. The row with men shows that men cannot control themselves, as they end up as convicts and drunkards.It also shows that men are greedy, like the proprietor of white slaves. From my own knowledge, I know that 1912 was the time that the third Conciliation Bill had failed to give

women the right to vote. Again, using my own knowledge, I know that the poster was also used as propaganda, as it is clearly one-sided.

This shows that women did fight to get the right to vote before the war, and this was used as propaganda, so it may have got a few supporters to the side of women suffrage, not only because of the work that women had done during the war.The poster is actually the work of the Suffragettes, a militant campaign group to give the right to vote for women, so many women had been trying to get the vote, and the government may have been under pressure by then already. Using Source B, can see that many women, during 1905, did not bother about voting, as they had "warmly applauded" the decision to not give the right to vote for women. I can also see that there are 1.

3 million more women than men in the country, so men must have been worried, as the parliamentary elections would have been mainly giving women things, not men.Overall, men did not want women to be given the right to vote because they were too scared to give women the political power, as there were too many women. From my own knowledge, I know the Suffragettes had joined two years before 1905, but were unheard of until 1905. By looking at Source C, we know at once that it was used as propaganda.

This is due to the fact that it has an irresponsible woman as a stereotypical woman shown, unlike Source A, where it is the other way round. In the Source,

you can see a man standing who just came back home form a "hard day's work".From the man's point of view, you can see a girl sitting at the table looking exhausted after trying to take eon the mother's job. On the floor, you can see another little girl; this is trying to show to us that the girl is like a dog, sleeping on the floor. On the wall, you can see a poster saying "Votes for Women", and underneath, if you look closely, you can see a note saying; "back in an hour or so". You can tell that she has not been back in an hour because of the candle.

Candles last much longer than an hour, so she has not been back for a long time.Looking at the child, you can see that she has not been looked after by her mother properly, as she is wearing holy socks. If you think hard, then you can notice that is a woman is not there to do her job, then the hole has would turn upside down. Indirectly and unintentionally, the poster, published by the National League for Opposing Woman's Suffrage, is showing that women are very important in everyday life, especially domestic life. From Source D, I can see that it is an extract from Emeline Pankhurst's Autobiography.

In it, she says that with the violent campaigns, the women's suffrage became the news headlines. This shows that women were fighting to get the vote before the war had actually started. Source E is a picture of the Epsem Derby Race hors in 1913. This is when Emily Davison was killed.

She jumped

in front of the king's horse and died with fatal internal injuries. She was the first woman to die as a martyr to the cause for woman Suffrage; many men thought that if she was educated and jumped in front of a horse, then what would someone who is not educated do?In conclusion, I think that women did not get the vote because of the work that they did during the World War. This is because women had been doing campaigns long before this time. In France, women were not given the right to vote, as they had not campaigned for the right, but in England, women did and they got the vote. In my opinion, women only got the vote after the war because there was now a very good and strong reason as to why.

The war just acted as a catalyst, so women would have gotten the vote anyway, but much later than they had now.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New