The Holocaust and Its Change on History Essay Example
The Holocaust and Its Change on History Essay Example

The Holocaust and Its Change on History Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 6 (1491 words)
  • Published: April 16, 2022
View Entire Sample
Text preview

The trouble commenced in 1993 when Adolf Hitler was appointed to power as chancellor of Germany. He was characteristically high-minded in what he believed in and wanted everything to go his way. Shortly after assuming power, efforts began in the preparation of a tragedy that would later be known as The Holocaust (LaCapra, 1996). It targeted to kill a variety of citizens, the Jewish race in particular. Germany, at this point in time, was the racial country that judged people on their religious beliefs and political communities (Spiegel, 2007). The Nazis planned to murder the Jewish people (Shermer & Grobman, 2009). The Holocaust was a devastating occurrence during World War Two. It led to the transformation in the lives of many individuals all over the world (Bet-El & Ben-Amos, 1999).

The Holocaust resulted in the death of many people, who included politic

...

al enemies, African Americans, Jews, Gypsies, Jehovah’s witnesses and the physically challenged. Hitler had developed many strategies to kill a large number of individuals and perfected everything in the end. To understand the Holocaust, I scrutinized the motivations of the Nazi, the absence of resistance to its regime and the country’s innovation for killing a large number of Jews. The mastermind behind it was a very deceitful, persuasive and intelligent person (Spiegel, 2009).
When Hitler rose to power, he formed military and police forces that would smother anyone who dared rise against his regime. With this force in motion, he developed the first concentration camp, Dachau, which was used to starve prisoners to death. It later became a concentration camp to eliminate Jews (Cole, 2000). On April 1933, the Nazis started by boycotting the Jewish-run businesses

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

The Nuremberg Laws issued made, excluded Jews from most public life (Finkelstein, 2000). The law involved depriving the Jews of their citizenship, extramarital sex between Jews and Germans and outlawed marriages. This legislation was the commencement that paved a way for all legal standards for additional anti-Jewish laws (Van Alphen, 1997).

Many may question what Hitler had against the Jews. The most corporate answer is that Hitler wanted to build a perfect race which consisted of Aryan people and to achieve this, he saw it necessary to eradicate all imperfect people (Black & Wallace, 2001). Following the-the Nuremberg laws, many laws against the Jews were formulated. This extruded the Jews from the German general public (Young, 1998). After taking out a few people, the idea of the final solution came up. This idea was discussed at the Wannsee conference, which was held in Berlin. In the meeting, the discussion was about how to exterminate the ‘imperfect people’ (Maier, 2000). It came up with many ideas that would be applied to meet his desire. One particular idea was to evacuate Jews to the Far East, but a presence of many obstacles deemed it impossible. They later agreed to the concept of the concentration camps, which would be then converted to death traps. This approach killed the majority of the people (Rubenstein & Roth, 2003).

The “Kristallnacht” on November 9th and 10th 1938, was dismaying for Jews. The night was filled with violence and burning down of synagogues. The Jewish-owned businesses were raided, and about 30000 Jews were arrested after being physically attacked (Fisher, 1995). They were taken to concentration camps. The SS leader Reinhard Heydrich requested formulation of

decrees to ban Jews from any contacts with the Germans (Zielinski & Custance, 1980). They were excluded from public transport, hospitals, schools and they were mostly forced into ghettos (Thornton, 1987). The ghettos were areas in cities that the Nazis ordered the Jews to live in. Ghettos started off more open, with less strict regulations, but with time, they got more stringent, and the Jews were trapped within boundaries. The Nazis then sent deportations from the ghettos which tricked them that they were being relocated to another location for labor (Lang, 1999). About 1,000 people per day were forced on trains and sent to either death or concentration camp. When the Nazis decided to kill the remaining of the Jews in the Warsaw ghetto (the largest at the time with 445000 residents), they would discharge a ghetto by loading them on a train (Flannery, 2002). When the Nazis tried to break the Warsaw Ghetto, the Jews brought up a fight, called the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising (Flannery, 2002).

The Jewish captives in the death camps were either coaxed into gas chambers or moved into gas vans and killed efficiently. In Auschwitz alone (the largest extermination), approximately 1.1 million people were killed (Bauman, 1989). Hitler peacefully went on with his plan successfully until when the World War 2 started to slow down his motives. When he realized he was becoming less potent, and his plan close to being complete, he and his new bride Eva Braun committed suicide (Fisher, 1995). Estimates have it that eleven million people were slain during the Holocaust, six million being Jews (Breisach, 2003).

The holocausts change in history was very significant. It brought the

Jewish people to the plight of the human race. Before, the Jewish population was considered an embarrassment in many European nations (Lang, 2000). When devastating carnages locally faced them, the news was spread, and the Jews that fled were regarded as part of a restless horde. The Holocaust resulted in the worldwide confrontation of the inhumane tragedy (Thornton, 1987). Also, the Jews realized a need to have a state on their own since outsiders would not protect them desirable. They brought up their territory called Israel (Shermer & Grobman, 2009). In setting up their nation, they displaced the Palestinians who then became the faceless hoard the Jews had been. The world opinion would have rested to favor the Palestinians, but instead, they chose terrorism, a path that would instead alienate everyone (Goldhagen, 2007).

References

  1. Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Cornell University Press.
  2. Bergen, D. L. (2009). War and genocide: A concise history of the Holocaust. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  3. Bet-El, I., & Ben-Amos, A. (1999). Holocaust Day and Memorial Day in Israeli schools: Ceremonies, education and history. Israel Studies, 4(1), 258-284.
  4. Black, E., & Wallace, B. (2001). IBM and the Holocaust: The strategic alliance between Nazi Germany and America's most powerful corporation (p. 10). New York: Crown Publishers.
  5. Breisach, E. (2003). On the future of history: The postmodernist challenge and its aftermath. University of Chicago Press.
    Bromley, P., & Russell, S. G. (2010).
  6. The Holocaust as history and human rights: A cross- national analysis of Holocaust education in social science textbooks, 1970– 2008. Prospects, 40(1), 153-173.
  7. Cole, T. (2000). Selling the Holocaust: From Auschwitz to Schindler: How history is bought, packaged, and sold. Psychology Press.
  8. Fackenheim, E. L. (1978). The Jewish return into history: reflections in

the age of Auschwitz and a New Jerusalem. Schocken.

  • Finkelstein, N. (2000). The Holocaust Industry. Index on Censorship, 29(2), 120-130.
  • Fisher, M. (1995). After the Wall: Germany, the Germans and the Burdens of History. Simon & Schuster.
  • Flannery, T. (2002). The eternal frontier: an ecological history of North America and its peoples. Grove Press.
  • Gergen, K. J. (2005). Narrative, moral identity, and historical consciousness. Narration, identity and historical consciousness, 99-119.
  • Goldhagen, D. J. (2007). A moral reckoning: The role of the Church in the Holocaust and its unfulfilled duty of repair. Vintage.
  • Hasian Jr, M., & Frank, R. E. (1999). Rhetoric, history, and collective memory: Decoding the Goldhagen debates. Western Journal of Communication (includes Communication Reports), 63(1), 95-114.
  • LaCapra, D. (1996). Representing the Holocaust: History, theory, trauma. Cornell University Press.
  • Lang, B. (1999). The future of the Holocaust: Between history and memory. Cornell University Press.
  • Lang, B. (2000). Holocaust Representation: Art within the limits of History and Ethics. JHU Press.
  • Laub, D. (2009). On Holocaust Testimony and Its" Reception" within Its Own Frame, as a Process in Its Own Right: A Response to" Between History and Psychoanalysis" by Thomas Trezise. History & Memory, 21(1), 127-150.
  • Lowenthal, D. (1996). Possessed by the past: The heritage crusade and the spoils of history. Free Press.
  • Maier, C. S. (2000). Consigning the twentieth century to history: Alternative narratives for the modern era. The American Historical Review, 105(3), 807-831.
  • Maier, C. S. (2009). The unmasterable past: History, Holocaust, and German national identity. Harvard University Press.
  • Myers, D. N. (2003). Resisting history: Historicism and its discontents in German-Jewish thought (p. 217). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Petrie, J. (2000). The secular word HOLOCAUST: scholarly myths, history, and 20th century meanings. Journal of Genocide Research, 2(1), 31-63.
  • Rubenstein, R. L., & Roth,
  • J. K. (2003). Approaches to Auschwitz: The Holocaust and its legacy. Westminster John Knox Press.

  • Shermer, M., & Grobman, A. (2009). Denying history: who says the Holocaust never happened and why do they say it? Univ of California Press.
  • Spiegel, G. M. (2007). Revising the past/revisiting the present: How change happens in historiography. History and Theory, 46(4), 1-19.
  • Spiegel, G. M. (2009). The task of the historian. The American Historical Review, 114(1), 1-15.
  • Thornton, R. (1987). American Indian holocaust and survival: A population history since 1492 (Vol. 186). University of Oklahoma Press.
  • Van Alphen, E. (1997). Caught by history: Holocaust effects in contemporary art, literature, and theory. Stanford University Press.
  • Young, J. E. (1998). The Holocaust as Vicarious Past: Art Spiegelman's" Maus" and the Afterimages of History. Critical Inquiry, 24(3), 666-699.
  • Zielinski, S., & Custance, G. (1980). History as Entertainment and Provocation: The TV Series" Holocaust" in West Germany. New German Critique, (19), 81-96.
  • Get an explanation on any task
    Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
    New