Mr.Krishi Pothur Essay Example

to adopt a Crusading mentality, thus demonstrating the extent of the Church's control over Europe's people. Examining different social classes' economic status is also intriguing; during the Crusades clergy tended to be wealthiest group while lower down Medieval Social Pyramid members of society faced increasing financial instability.

In the Crusading Social class, it was easier to break free of the chain and achieve a different position regardless of one's Socioeconomic class. This was made possible by the Holy Land becoming a center of learning and commerce, even amidst the violent battles that were happening. The Crusades enabled individuals from any social class, particularly the lower classes, to attain financial stability. However, the Church continued to hold dominion over these men as they were the authority in a Holy war like the Crusades.

The relationship between the Church and the lower social classes is described as a subtle tyranny concealed by the Church's strong determination to fight for God. However, it is still unclear whether this determination was truly for the Church or for God. The answer can be interpreted in either way and could also be a combination of both, considering the Church's peak dominance during the Timeline of European History. Nevertheless, the Church failed to adequately train these passionate soldiers to eliminate the remnants of Islamic barbarism, resulting in many of them dying in a horrifying manner during the war.

The brutality witnessed during the Crusades was unimaginable, resulting in countless innocent lives lost solely due to religious beliefs. The actions of the Crusaders led to numerous casualties that would be considered war crimes today, including thousands of Jews and Muslims

who were not combatants but ordinary civilians. It is important to acknowledge that both the Crusaders and the Church bear responsibility for these atrocities.

The Church viewed Muslims as allies of the Devil and believed that their actions always led to destruction. According to Riley, two brothers traveled to Jerusalem in order to seek God's grace through pilgrimage and also put an end to the corruption caused by pagan and immoderate behavior. This behavior had already oppressed, captured, and killed numerous Christians in a violent rage. This demonstrates how Crusaders saw Muslims and Jews as "savages" or "barbarians." Despite these derogatory terms, the Crusaders still committed terrible acts and carried out genocidal actions when capturing cities defended by Muslims. However, it was primarily the Church that encouraged this conduct among its devoted followers against any non-Christian population. Therefore, accountability for their deeds cannot solely be attributed to the Crusaders.

The Crusaders and Clergy genuinely believed in fighting for God, rather than seeking personal gain or other advantages that came with the invasion of present-day Israel. The Crusades allowed knights and commoners to show their loyalty to the Church and their dedication to the Christian faith.

The Crusades led to the emergence of a mini crusading culture in Europe and Jerusalem, fostering greater interconnectedness among different social classes. These expeditions served as both an escape from reality and an opportunity for individuals to embark on a physical and spiritual adventure. People were attracted to the Holy Land with the goal of witnessing God's presence, supporting the church, and engaging in warfare against Muslim armies and inhabitants of cities like Tyre and Jaffa. While

defending the Church and freeing Eastern Christians was the primary motivation for these Crusades, there were also hidden agendas involved. The first Crusade, for example, aimed to unite all of Europe under Church leadership by having Kings and their governments pay homage. Additionally, there was a defense of the Byzantine Empire led by Emperor Alexios I Komnenos who represented the last remnants of the once-great Roman Empire. Another objective was to liberate Christians living under Muslim rule in regions such as Southern Spain during the Early Middle Ages.

The concept of Crusading lost its appeal following the failed endeavor to reclaim Jerusalem, resulting in a decline in popularity. The subsequent crusades lacked the same level of dedication as the initial one and instead prioritized financial gain. Ironically, during one crusade, Constantinople was sacked, contradicting the Crusaders' purpose of safeguarding it.

The Children's crusade involved numerous children trying to conquer the Holy Land. However, most of them were either sold as slaves or abandoned the crusade and established themselves in new lands or returned to Europe before achieving their goal. Nonetheless, the Crusades promoted global trade and the exchange of ideas between Eastern and Western philosophies. This suggests that the Crusades were not completely harmful. Additionally, they provided hope for individuals enduring severe poverty during the Middle Ages.

The Crusades had a significant impact on the Middle Ages and how they were perceived. It is incredible that a single person's words could rally an entire continent to participate in a "Holy War" for unfamiliar but sacred land. The phrase "Dues vult" (God wills it) resounded throughout much of the Middle Ages.