Holographic Wills And Back Child Support Rules Essay Example
Holographic Wills And Back Child Support Rules Essay Example

Holographic Wills And Back Child Support Rules Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
Topics:
  • Pages: 2 (532 words)
  • Published: March 30, 2022
View Entire Sample
Text preview

This paper will discuss the analysis, conclusions, and recommendations in part five and six based on the presented cases. The first case to be addressed is Dixon vs.

A petition has been filed by Mrs Dixon holly to challenge the probate of a holographic will initiated by Mr Dixon's sister, who is acting as the personal representative of his estate. The current issue revolves around the legal validity of the will according to Texas law. For a will to be eligible for probate in Texas, it must have been proven valid at the time it was created. Moreover, the will must be in written form and handwritten by the testator, with at least two credible witnesses attesting to it. Typically, this type of will requires a subscribing witness.

However, there is an exception to the rule when a will

...

is entirely written by the testator in their own handwriting. In this case, subscribing witnesses are not necessary to validate the will. Typically, this type of will is self-supporting and can be enforced during the testator's lifetime. The only requirement is for the will to be filed or attached with an affidavit from the testator, declaring it as their last will. The affidavit should also state that the testator was of sound mind, 18 years old, and had not rejected the will.

Based on these arguments, we can resolve Mr. Dixon's issue in the case of Dixon vs. Cary. It is clear that the will is legally valid, and both Mr. Dixon's sister and his personal representative can proceed with probating it. This is because the testator of the will was Mr. Dixon himself, and the will accurately represent

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

his intended wishes. Even though he may not have written it entirely himself, evidence demonstrates that he at least signed it.

Therefore, Mrs. Dixon must accept the verdict and comply with the will. In part six, the case of Edridge v Edridge, Mr. Edridge presented a case concerning child support, and the court handled the matter with care and skill. The ruling in Mr. Edridge's case was fair. Additionally, it is evident that Mr. Edridge was dedicated to fulfilling his child support obligations until circumstances outside of his control occurred. It would have been unjust for the court to surpass the established rules and require Mr. Edridge to pay the entire outstanding amount. As a result, the court's verdict fell within the exception for back child support.

Among the exceptions are illnesses and disabilities, debt payments, special needs of a child, and financial problems, as seen in Mr. Edridge's case. Therefore, the judge representing Mrs. Edridge was wise in advising her to obey and abide by the court order and its rule of law. It would be unreasonable for Mrs. Edridge to continue pursuing charges as it would be a waste of time and resources. Instead, she should accept the rule of law. In conclusion, both cases in part five and six are common occurrences in daily life and represent family obligations.

The family, which has been depicted as a spectrum of the cases under study, reached the verdict in both cases by exercising due care and diligence.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New