Functionalist, Conflict, and Symbolic Perspective on Social and Income Inequality Essay Example

many processes or outcomes in between before coming to this discovery but it is insignificant to prove the underlying subject matter of income inequalities, and the increased mugging within that specific area (Linda A. Mooney, 2014, p353).

Conflict perspective on the other hand concerns itself with the substantive facts resulting in the outcome. Conflict perspective is very thorough with its implications. Where, Conflicts perspectives can be said to exist if the crime rise has been on the increase due to differential incomes resulting in a larger gap between the rich and the poor, and in what period, this year. Whatever happened last year will cease to matter as long as it is clear what year it is, and why and where the message conveyed is coming from (Linda A. Mooney, 2014, p353).
At last is the Symbolic perspectives; the reader will find that many of the perspectives implementation phases will often require the use of face to face interactions. Stating things differently is to say symbolic perspective will often ask why people think income inequalities have increased in the rate of mugging this year on an individual basis. Every thought according to symbolic perspective is therefore valid, provided it explains why income inequality has increased in mugging. The interactionism creates meaning to the holder of the information, according George Herbert (Prus, 1996, p116-117).

Interestingly sociologists often confuse functionalist and symbolic perspectives. Perhaps it is because they both regard the trueness of interpersonal nature or the two way system it has developed for, aimed at achieving specific results unlike that associated with conflict. However, the difference lies in the regarding the specific problem to be addressed and hypothesis to

be examined. Functionalist on the other hand seems to go with the flow regardless of whether or not anyone agrees with it. In relation to the aforementioned paragraphs, the reader should be increasingly becoming aware of the manifestation of the paradigms how, as well where and when to apply them (Skidmore, 1975, p3).

Conclusion

The paper has demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt the relationship social has on income inequality. In a demonstration constructed to define the said perspectives. Each unique in character and showing how they work together. The paper has demonstrated how.

Reference

1. Levitt, S. D. (2016). The changing relationship between income and crime victimization. Retrieved April 12, 2016, from Newyorkfed.org: https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/epr/99v05n3/9909levi.pdf
2. Linda A. Mooney, D. K. (2014). Understanding Social Problems. New York: Cengage Learning.
3. Prus, R. C. (1996). Symbolic Interaction and Ethnographic Research: Intersubjectivity and the Study of Human Lived Experience. New York: Suny Press.
4. Skidmore, W. (1975). Sociology's Models of Man: The Relationships of Models of Man to Sociological Explanation in Three Sociological Theories. New York: Taylor & Francis.