Classical Management Theorists Essay Example

he/she is best suited for. Taylor's third principle is supported by Fayol's principle of stability of tenure and equity.

Fayol himself insisted that his work is complementary to Taylor's work as they both sought to improve management through different avenues (Wren, 1994). The reason for the different outlooks on management by Taylor and Fayol is due to the different lives that they led.

Taylor and Fayol, although different in many aspects, offer complementary views on management. Their theories go hand in hand to achieve the most efficient results in an organisation. Taylor started off as a worker, gained promotions and made his way up to a manager therefore his approach revolved ore around the technical aspects of management and how to achieve best results through the workers.

He was interested in methods to improve productivity. Fayol, on the other hand began his career as an engineer and got promoted to a manager.

He saw management form an executive point of view and he was engaged in integrating the various aspects of an organisation to achieve best results. They had similar views and their objective was the same.

It was only their approach to achieve these results that differed. If Fayol's and Taylor's priciples of management are both implemented in an rganisation, it is bound to achieve results in terms of efficiency and productivity and profits in the long run.

Fayol and Taylor had similar views. A primary difference between the two is that Taylor viewed the process of management form the bottom, that is, form the workers point of view, whereas Fayol viewed the process from the top, that is, from the manager's point of

view.

Taylor observed the workers actions then studies the effects of their actions on productivity, devised new methods for making them more efficient, and applied what he learns at lower levels to the eiararcy.

Fayol synthesised various views or principles of organisation and management and Taylor on work methods, measurement and simplification to secure efficiencies but both methods go together to achieve best results. References Hodgetts, G. , (1995) Frederick Taylor: Alive and well and ready for the 21st century, Academy of Management Journal, p. 218-223.

Pindur, W. & Rogers. S 1995 The History of Management: a global perspective, Journal of Management History vol 1 Noll . pp59-77 Wren, D.

, (1994) The Evolution of Management Thought, John Wiley and Son, New York.