Critical perspectives on management and leadership Essay Example
Critical perspectives on management and leadership Essay Example

Critical perspectives on management and leadership Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 7 (3381 words)
  • Published: August 10, 2017
  • Type: Research Paper
Text preview

There is a difference between what theorists believe directors should make, what directors believe they should make, and what directors really end up making ( Grint, 1995 ) . Using critical theory to find what is what and who has what.

Critical Theory

The Frankfurt School of Critical Theory is the longest and most celebrated tradition of Marxism. This tradition is frequently referred to as critical theory- intending a particular sort of societal doctrine from its origin in 1923 by Felix Weil ( Seiler, 2004 ) . The critical theory of society of the Frankfurt School continues to excite involvement and contention ( Kellner, 2001 ) . A theory is critical to the extent that it seeks human emancipation, to emancipate human existences from the fortunes that enslave them. A figure of critical theories has emerged in connexion with the many societal motions that identify the varied dimensions of the domination of human existences in modern societies ( Gutting, 2003 ) .

Therefore, the term 'critical theory ' was used as the symbol of a doctrine that inquiries the effectual order of political and societal modernness through an order of immanent review. It was chiefly an effort to recover a critical potency that had been overrun by recent rational, societal, cultural, economic, and technological tendencies.

The term Critical theory has its beginnings in the twentieth century Frankfurt School and now is associated with bookmen across a scope of disciplines.An Its intent of inquiry is to face unfairness in society ( Clark, 2004 ) . A Critical Theory has been profoundly concerned with the destiny of modernness and has offered


systematic and comprehensive theories of the flight of modernness. The critical theory began by setting the Marxian political-economic system at the Centre of analysis, and early critical theory was a materialist and committed to socialism ( Gingrich, 2000 ) .

Critical theory has by and large been committed to the thought of modernness and advancement, while at the same clip observing the ways that characteristics of modernness can make jobs for persons and society ( Kellner, 2000 ) . This is much reflected in the twenty-first century, though there is advancement in many things, still, issues like globalization tend to present import jobs for society.

Harmonizing to Heilman ( 1998 ) , being critical involves understanding the sets of historically contingent fortunes and contradictory power relationships that create the conditions in which we live.A Theory helps us to form the universe, to screen out the inside informations, to do some coherent sense out of a kaleidoscope of esthetics ( Ayers, 1992 ) .

When theory is theorized, as stated by Heilman ( 1998 ) , the jussive moods of pattern convey the theory down to the ground. Phenomenons is observed and experienced; this experience informs theory, and so the theory is further modified as a consequence of the extra practice. Rather like fiction authorship, critical theorizing is a procedure of conceiving ofing and depicting a non-real but possible universe.

The critical theoreticians have profoundly influenced modern-day societal theory, communicating theories, cultural theory, and many more for a figure of decades. Harmonizing to Clark ( 2004 ) , Critical theoreticians

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

are committed to understanding the relationship between social constructions ( such as economic and political ) and ideological forms of the idea that constrain the human imaginativeness and therefore bound chances for facing and altering unfair societal systems.ACritical theoreticians emphasize that theory and research must function manumitter involvements, to make a universe that satisfies the demands and powers of societal histrions ( Sanghera, 2004 ) .A

Harmonizing to critical theory, people are dominated by a false consciousness created and perpetuated by the capitalist economy in order to continue the hegemony of those in power ( Meyer-Emerick, 2004 ) . Due to this cause, one can presume that it prevents people from freely prosecuting their ain interests. This dissent is merely discharged if people begin to see the contradictions between the societal building of the universe and their lived experience.A

Critical Management Studies

Critical direction surveies besides known as 'CMS ' which is the known as the term that describes the a diverse group of people that has adopted the critical or oppugning attacks to direction, this term emerged of recent old ages.

The study lineation

The above statement sets the temper for this study, as the study will be looking at how the critical direction theory of yesterday applies to the modern western attacks of direction today. Another cardinal facet will be on seeking to joint the connexions between the direction positions of modern-day society in the critical theory.

The focal point will be on Karl Marx and Michael Foucault as critical theoreticians and how their positions affect the direction and leading in today's modern western epoch. Marx argued that a capitalist economy, like old socioeconomic systems, would necessarily bring forth internal tenseness which will take to its devastation. Just as the capitalist economy replaced the feudal system, he believed socialism would, in its bend, replace the capitalist economy, and lead to a stateless, classless society called pure communism; Marx's economic relationship between directors and the workers. Whilst Foucault argued that forms in disciplinary behavior are found in direction patterns.

Direction and Leading

Scientific direction

Scientific direction ( Taylor System ) besides known as Taylorism is a theory of direction that analysis and industries' workflows to better employee ( labor ) productiveness. The thought was developed by Frederick Winslow Taylor between 1880 and 1890, and it was the first published 'monograph ' ( written papers ) . Frederick Taylor believed that determinations based upon tradition and the regulations of the pollex should be replaced by accurate processes that are developed after a survey of a person at work. This means that there is a high degree of managerial control over employee work patterns.

Scientific direction is a differentiation on the subject of 'efficiency ' ; it developed in the 19th and twentieth century were a case of the big repeating subject in the human life of increasing efficiency, diminishing waste, and utilizing experiential methods to order what matters instead of accepting preexistent thoughts of what affairs. Management today is the greatest usage of scientific direction is a signifier to contrast a new and improved manner of making concern.


Leadership is holding the ability to give counsel to those that will follow.

Those that follow will assist to finish the mission. It is an immature scientific discipline and the organic structure of cognition in the field has developed through a series of tantrums and starts. Leadership is a soft scientific discipline, merely as anthropology, sociology, and psychological science. It can non be proven precisely what it is. Leadership is an art; the adept application of leading behaviors beyond techniques is much the same as the adept application of brushstrokes by a maestro painter. Leadership is both rational and emotional. It involves both sides of the human experience. It includes actions and influences based on ground and logic every bit good those based on inspiration and passion. Leadership is a societal procedure shared among all members of a group. ( Yolk, 2002 )

Leadership besides involves in political activity as in power activity; conversely, it is much more like transformational leading. Political procedures involve attempts by members of the organization to increase their power or protect bing power beginnings ( Pfeiffer, 1981 ) . Although the ultimate beginning of political power is normally authority, control over resources, or control over information, political power involves influence processes that transform and amplify the initial footing of power in alone ways

Karl Marx

Marxist's idea is based on this lifestyle, a scientific discipline of logic called Dialectics. Thus, Marxism is both a theory and a pattern. The theories of Marxism are based on a scientific method of an idea called dialectal materialism. The theory is based on a particular set of conditions that are ever finite, and therefore, any theory is needfully limited. To prove the cogency of theory, Marxists rely on empirical grounds as the standards of truth ( Basgen, 2005 ) .

Marxism embraces modernness and Marxists argue that one of the chief jobs is that the capitalist economy puts hobbles on the progressive forces. The forces of the capitalist economy are viewed as imperfect in brushing off the traditional, spiritual, rearward, and feudal signifiers of society, distributing industrialization and urbanization across societies ( Moody, 2003 ) .

Michel Foucault

His surveies challenged the influence of German political philosopher Karl Marx and Austrian psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud. Foucault offered new constructs that challenged people's premises about prisons, the constabulary, insurance, attention of the mentally sick, cheery rights, and public assistance ( Ron, 2000 ) .

The chief influences on Foucault's idea were German philosophers, Frederick Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger. The website, describes Foucault's idea as explored the switching forms of power within a society and the ways in which power relates to the ego. He investigated the changing regulations regulating the sort of claims that could be taken earnestly as true or false at different times in history.

Critical Analysis

Marx review of capitalist economies

Capitalism is the system that upholds the relationship between the proprietors of the agencies of production and workers. The former comprise the businessperson category and the latter the labor

Marx's review of the capitalist economy was that while this system had unbelievable power and potency to transform human society positively, the inexistent fact it resulted in the development and finally limited the possibility for further betterment ( Powell, 2001 )

. Moody ( 2003 ) , describes this environment as workers were emancipated from traditional bounds but became slaves of the new mill system, monopolization resulted in bounds on trade and further advancement, and the province acted in the involvements of the middle class instead of society as a whole.

Commodity Fetishism

Labour Power

To be clear about is what the capitalist has bought. The worker has sold non his labor but for his ability to work. This Marx calls his labor-power. Besides, as Marx defines, 'labor-power is the abstraction of human labor into something that can be exchanged for money. In add-on, the capitalist economy can purchase labor power as a trade good.

In other words, 'Labour power is a trade good governed by the same Torahs as other trade goods. Its value is determined by the labor time necessary for its production. Labour power is the ability of the worker to work. It is `` consumed '' by the capitalist in the existent labor process. ( R.Sewell and A.Woods )

Marx explains, `` I use the term labor-power or capacity for labor, to denote the sum of that bodily and mental capablenesss bing in a human being, which he exercises whenever he produces a use-value of any sort '' aˆ¦ `` The value of labor power, like that of every other trade good, is determined by the labor clip necessary for the production, and accordingly for the reproduction every bit good, of this specific article every bit good.

Capitalism Power

As Campbell ( 1981:34 ) describes, 'aˆ¦as in bondage, where the manufacturers themselves are owned by the bondage proprietors; in a feudal system where the land is owned by the landlords; or in a capitalist economy where machinery and mills ( capital ) are owned by capitalists. ' In a capitalist economy, the 'machinery and mills ' is non the lone thing owned by capitalists ( or mill proprietors ) , besides labors. For illustration, in an auto devising mill, all the machinery are fixed assets to the mill proprietor, types of machinery can non do net income for the mill proprietor if no 1 operates them, and so laborers who operate machinery are the chief assets to the mill proprietors.

In add-on, labor power is a trade good ( which is bought and sold on the 'labor' market ) , ( The Marxist review of the capitalist economy ) because it has an exchange value. As Campbell ( 1981: 38 ) says 'all trade goods labor power has an exchange value, its monetary value ( the pay ) , yet once more like all trade goods, it besides has usage value to the buyer. ' The buyer here is any capitalist economy or any mill proprietors. It continues 'one purchased, like any commodityaˆ¦ Labour power is owned hence, as a machine, and is put to work ' ( Campbell 1981:38 ) As the labor-power is a trade good, so once it is purchased by mill proprietor, the proprietor has the power to either using it or interchange it to others. Besides, in a capitalist economy, one time the proprietor purchases new labor power, he has

the right to do a determination on how much he will pay to his new laborers, and how long the new laborers will work every hebdomad; besides he can fire any of the laborers in his mill any clip if he feels nonsatisfied with them.

in a capitalist economic system, the huge bulk of people have merely their labor power to sell in order to derive income with which to buy nutrients, vesture, lodging, and other goods and services. The agency of production are owned by the capitalist category and if they are unwilling to engage labor, or wish to cut down the Numberss of workers they employ, this puts workers prosperity instantly at hazard ' ( Campbell 1981:111 )

Marx's statement was against the capitalist economy, which he referred to as a phase at which every society must travel through that can convey about the seed of its ain devastation. He indicated that human kernel was labor and physical attempt needed in the production of the agencies of subsistence. Hence, some signifiers of production are needed for endurance. The suggestion is that it is acceptable for oneself but non for others because some persons may hold all factors of production ( capital, entrepreneurship, labor, and land ) , while others may hold nil but merely their ain labor, which finally will ensue in uneven distribution of wealth and income. Additionally, Marx argued that capitalist economy deprives the labor force of their 'creative fulfillment ' , and since they are portrayed to be the already planned portion of the production procedure, they are unable to accomplish self-actualization.

Exploitation and Alienation

For Marx, this disaffection works as a procedure, but it can be broken up into 3 different facets for analysis. The first facet of disaffection under analysis is how workers are alienated from the merchandise they produce. Under a capitalist economy, the object the workers produce is surrendered for the rewards they receive. The workers so lose any relation to the object they are bringing forthing because they are passing it over. This is of the class is different from the system of autonomy, where the workers have a much more direct relationship with the object that they produce. As the workers become more independent of their merchandise, they transfer power to the employer. As mentioned in Marx's review on the political-economic system, the more objects the worker produces, so the more power the employer possesses which will take to a greater failure to the workers. Therefore under this system, the workers are merely viing to be exploited. This is a signifier of disaffection because the object that the worker produces becomes a foreign entity to him, independent of his control, and finally controls the worker.

Another facet of disaffection that Marx examines is how " the ego '' becomes another foreign entity to the worker. Under the manner of the capitalist economy, the on-the-job conditions are established by the capitalists and non by the workers themselves. These conditions are established along with the pieces of evidence of the capitalist's drive for net incomes, instead of the worker's need for self-fulfillment. Marx felt that self-fulfillment

was a major purpose of an individual, and felt that under the system of the capitalist economy, where your working conditions are created by your employer, it was impossible for the worker to derive this self-fulfillment. He besides felt that the capitalist employers were victims of this job excessively because if they didn't drive for net incomes, so they would be put out of concern. The labour itself is described by Marx as " exterior to the worker, that is, it does non belong to his kernel. Therefore he does non corroborate himself in his work, he denies himself, feels suffering alternatively of happiness, deploys no free physical and rational energy, but mortifies his organic structure and ruins his head '' ( David McLellan 2000 ) .

Explain Marx's articulation of development. The pattern of mistreating of workers in an environment that is intentionally designed to keep it, i.e. capitalist economy, Marx's conforming - the workers alienated by/owners of the agencies of production to derive net incomes at the disbursal of the workers ( e.g. directors coercing employees to set about undertakings outside their occupation description in order to cut costs and maximize net incomes ) because people are alienated they conform to the demands of their employers in order to maintain occupations safe.

Foucault disciplinary Power

Moves off from the economic sciences of Marx. Looks at power and reconceptualizes it. Management as a representation of power dealings in society. Specific regulations maintain, regulate, and commit patterns in a work environment ( office, mill, school, etc ) ,


Disciplinary power the panopticon as an illustration of society, the in-between tower is all-seeing yet captives ever obey without cognizing for certain whether they are being monitored, by whom or by how many. The consequence is the creative activity of self-regulating, obedient, and disciplined captives ( at least in theory ) . Associate this signifier of disciplinary power to direct.

Power is the cardinal driving force in a society within a group of people in an on-job environment. Manager doesn't make a system the director simply plays along with the regulations, therefore keeping the dealings of laterality and dominated.

Critical Analysis on Leadership

Over the influence procedure of leading, it needs power. ( Northhouse, 2007 ) . Leaderships are normally described as wielders of power in the treatment of leading because they are persons who dominate others. Power is the capacity or potency to act upon another party ( Mint berg, 1983 ; Pfeiffer, 1981, 1992 ) . It is talked as the footing of leading harmonizing to many political theoreticians like Machiavelli through academic political scientists such as Marx in the 20th century. Peoples have power when they have the ability to impact others ' beliefs, attitudes, and classes of action. Curates, instructors, physicians, and managers are illustrations of persons utilizing power to consequence alteration in people. In the commercial, there are two major types of power, place power and personal power ( Bass, 1960 ; Etienne, 1991 ) : Position power refers to the power an individual derives from a peculiar rank in a formal organization system, for illustration, section caputs have more power than clerical

staff in place. It includes possible influence derived from legitimate authorization, control over resources and wages, control over penalties, control over information, and control over the physical work environment. Personal power refers to the power a leader derives from following. It includes possible influence derived from undertaking expertness and possible influence based on friendly relationships and trueness. Followings give leaders power when leaders act in ways that are of importance to them. Power is besides built-in in an individual's place in the organization. ( Bass, 1960 ; Etienne, 1991 )

Harmonizing to Northhouse ( 2007 ) the current dominant leading paradigm is the transmutation attacks which is a procedure that alterations and transforms people. The elements at the bosom of transformational leading are idealized influence, inspirational motive, rational stimulation, and single consideration.

Critical Analysis on Scientific direction

The Marxist theory of capital sees labor as a cost of production ensuing in the disaffection of workers as the demand for labor surfaces from the physical demands " defined by the cardinal relationship between worlds and their physical environment '' ( Hatch, 1997, p.27 ) . Taylor's thoughts on scientific direction ( 1990 ) have similar economic subjects to Marx and Adam Smith. By sing direction as a scientific discipline, he broke down the managerial job into phases of research, definition, analysis, and implementation. His rules were inherently based on the premise that people put in every bit small attempt as possible into their work and were soldiering on in order to gain money. This shifted all the duty from the worker to the director and scientific methods were used to find the most efficient manner of working. after choosing the best individual capable of executing the undertaking, they were trained to work expeditiously and their public presentation was purely monitored. In hindsight, though this may hold appeared to be a good generic scheme for the success of a house, it to a great extent depended on whether the optimum method of bringing forthing could be found and whether or non the scheme was implemented correctly.