Animals in Captivity – Should or Should Not Be Kept Essay Example

wild animal capture still occurs.

Zoos typically feature popular, larger animals like giraffes, elephants, and tigers that are kept in captivity for the benefit of the zoo's popularity. However, there is a genetic diversity issue with captive-bred animals, specifically in the UK where a reduced gene pool has led to congenital deformities in snow leopard cubs. Additionally, removing animals from natural predators and challenges of the wild can negatively impact their longevity.

To sum up, I think that it is unethical and not acceptable to confine exotic animals for public display in circuses. However, if the purpose is conservation or because the animal cannot return to its natural habitat, then captivity might be necessary. As long as proper care and suitable surroundings resembling their natural environment are provided to promote their well-being, I believe keeping them in captivity is permissible. The requirements for keeping exotic animals are outlined in the Dangerous Wild Animals Act of 1976, which mandates a local authority license and appropriate accommodation to prevent animals from escaping. Moreover, veterinary surgeons or other authorized personnel must conduct annual inspections.

Regulations, such as licenses and suitable living conditions for animals, may have limited effectiveness if individuals are not aware of them. For instance, the Performing Animals Act 1925 governs animal use in shows and exhibitions, mandating that exhibitors or trainers register with local authorities. This act also bans performances considered cruel or unethical. However, not everyone must get a license nor comply with this rule. Conversely, the Zoo Licensing Act 1981 applies to collections of wild animals available to the public for more than seven days within a year. Its goal is to regulate conditions particularly

in cages or other restricted environments while ensuring sufficient space and proper care for captive animals.

Applications for licensing must be submitted to the Environmental Health Department of local authorities. This ensures that premises are inspected to ensure compliance with regulations. If premises are found to be unsuitable, the zoo may be required to close down. The Transit of Animals Order 1973 specifies requirements for transporting animals. This includes having a suitable receptacle, means of inspecting the animals, adequate space for standing, sitting, turning around and lying down, proper ventilation, and suitable bedding. The order aims to ensure that animals are transported humanely without causing harm. However, not all people adhere to these regulations. The Pet Animals Act 1951 regulates the sale of animals as pets in Britain. Anyone selling animals must obtain a license from local authorities. A license can only be issued if accommodations are suitable in terms of size and provision of light, ventilation, and heat; animals are provided with appropriate food and water; animals are monitored; precautions against disease and other emergencies are in place. This act ensures that animals can only be sold if they are healthy and in a suitable environment.

Regulating and monitoring national trade under CITES prevents animals from being sold on the streets and reaching unsustainable levels. This is beneficial in preventing illegal trade in wild animals. Additionally, the Health and Safety at Work Act of 1974 protects employees within the animal industry from accidents and includes Risk Assessments.

The Employers Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1964 mandates the need for employee insurance in case of accidents. On the other hand, public liability insurance is necessary for businesses to

safeguard against any incidents that may occur to visitors while on their premises. The insurance amount depends upon the number of visitors and the extent and number of hazards present.