Computerized Grading System with Sms Capability Essay Example

Under her leadership as director, she proudly and courageously introduced the Nursing, Elementary, and Medical Technology courses in 1993 and later added the Bachelor in Elementary Education (BEED), Bachelor of Science in Commerce (BSC), and Bachelor of Arts (AB) Major in political Science courses in 1997. This expansion of courses prompted a change in the school's name from San Lorenzo Ruiz De Manila (CSLRM) to accommodate the new offerings.

In 1991, Dr. Rolando R. Carpio and Dr. Gilda F. Carpio built a three-story building behind their family home to accommodate the growing school population. They transformed the expansive garden into a school lobby. Additionally, they acquired a new lot for the elementary department of the school. In 1994, a laboratory building was constructed for nursing and medical technology students. Construction is still ongoing, particularly with the introduction of TESDA Courses in 1998.

From 1990 to the present, the school has achieved significant accomplishments. However, for the school officials and staff, it is just the beginning in their pursuit of academic excellence. Their focus is on upgrading the faculty, research, and physical facilities. The increasing population of students from hundreds to thousands has highlighted the need for improvement in some outdated systems at CSLRM. These systems may not be equipped to handle the growing number of students. Therefore, upgrading this old system is crucial.

CSLRM could consider upgrading their grading system, as they currently use an annual grading system at the registrar's office. The registrar is responsible for holding the grades of students one week after the final exams. The grades submitted by instructors are compiled and kept by the registrar for student inquiries and

grade requests. However, there are issues with this manual system, as registrar personnel have to scan the compiled file to find a student's specific grade in a particular subject.

In order to receive another grade, the personnel must repeat the action (and it should be noted that regular students have 7 to 8 subjects). Consequently, tracking grades multiple times becomes exhausting and frustrating for registrar personnel. Additionally, it is a time-consuming process that requires students to be patient in waiting for their grades. The manual grading system clearly lacks efficiency. Moreover, consider the situation where 10 to 50 students are waiting in line to receive their grades; this could potentially consume an entire day.