Personality Tests: A Self-Awareness Tool Essay Example
Personality Tests: A Self-Awareness Tool Essay Example

Personality Tests: A Self-Awareness Tool Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 13 (3538 words)
  • Published: January 15, 2018
  • Type: Essay
View Entire Sample
Text preview

I believe, as human, if we permit ourselves, we will learn from all life experiences that will then make up our personality. But personality development is a never ending process, it continues until the day we die. The purpose of taking the personality test is to get a raw idea of how our behaviors and everyday actions tell us about our personality.

Even though we or the ones closed to us can be trusted Judges on our personality, a personality test may unfold more about our personality that we or our loved ones may have overlook.

It is a good idea of taking the personality test because this test was well prepared by many expert researchers who have dedicated their lives to study about the human resonantly and the factors that caused each and every one of us to be uniq

...

ue and different from one another. One of the example of such test is in the website http:// test. Personality-pro]etc. Org/. Thus, if we answer the questions truthfully, the result would be the closest idea to our personality.

The knowledge of one's own personality can help one understanding of how he represents himself to the society, how others perceived him and how he can actually manipulate this knowledge for his benefit in the sense that he can change himself to be what he wants himself to be and creates his own Ideal self-brand. This Is what the humanistic theorists believe, that humans have freedom to chart our own courses of life and have the innate drive within ourselves for personal growth.

I personally agree with their perspective on this because even if we do

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

not realized, there are many factors In life that can push us to be better than what we were, and propel us to make an effort toward our own personal growth. It does not matter how little the scale of the changes that we make, if it is positive, we are developing our personality.

DISCUSSION The personality test on http://test. Personality;pro]etc. Rag/, consist of a number of questions and the result divides human personality to five core traits which consists of extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability and openness.

I will discuss my result based on the traits separately and accordingly.

EXTROVERSION understanding, it is how we present ourselves in the social world. My score was considered an average so basically I am neither an obvious extrovert or an obvious introvert. Instead, I am somewhere in between. Personally I agree with the result because that is how I always Judged myself and how my friends see me as. When I was a child, I was always described as very quiet and shy to a stranger. But when I was around family, although I was not really a talkative kid, I did not feel shy as I was with strangers.

This perhaps is normal and perhaps the unconscious part of me, according to Sigmund Freud, that caused me to be cautious particularly with strangers. As I went through childhood and adolescence, I found myself always surrounded with many friends despite the fact that I was not the kind of person who will approach others first, I was never a friendly person to strangers. But the close friends I had were not big in number but I was

happy anyway. I found it was more comfortable to be with people who have already know me very well.

As I grew up and grew apart from that close friends I used to have and being placed in a new and different environment, I did not find much difficulties to find new ones as I thought I would. As the same as before, I had close friends but not great in number.

Then, I find the need for networking with more people during my high school years. Thinking that networking will serve me well in the future, I started to work for it, one at a time because the old habits of not approaching others first is arid to decline.

The benefits of networking can be seen as a stimulus that drives my response which is my action and effort to be more friendly and approachable according to Skinner's Operant Conditioning. In another point of view, which is the humanistic perspective is that there is an innate drive inside me that wanted to improve my personal growth.

I have always believed that my inner driving forces are strong and it always served to my benefits. In the future, I maybe will still not change into a talkative person, but I will be the kind of person who is friendly when being approached by others.

Agreeableness is defined as the quality of being agreeable, pleasing, suitable, and conformity. As what my result in the test indicated, my score on the agreeableness is average which means I do concern about others' needs but it does not mean that I would sacrifice my thoughts Just to please others.

I totally agree on this because it does reflects myself in terms of working in groups.

As a child, I would make tantrums whenever my wishes were not fulfilled. This is one example of egocentrics. Egocentrics is the incomplete differentiation of the self and the world and Jean Pigged said that it is common in early childhood.

It is also said that the egocentrics usually declined as the child grows older and become more mature. As a normal kid, I had times when I only saw things in the way I wanted it to seem and I expected other people did the same and fulfilled my wishes.

In my opinion, the egocentric part of me declined thanks to my parents' parenting skills. One of my parents' style of educating their children is to not give in too much to their children as some parents, who would spoil their kids and give everything they desire. My parents taught us to consider others' needs as well and that we would not get hat we want by throwing tantrums but to behave well.

My parents' reluctance by scolding me whenever I was being inconsiderate eventually resulted of me being a more considerate child worked like a negative reinforcement whereby unpleasant stimulus (getting scolded) was being removed by increasing the correct response (behaving well). But as extinction in Skinner's Operant Conditioning Theory applies, the effects had not lasted forever. There were times during adolescence that I became rebellious and not behaving as I was conditioned to be when I was a child.

As a curious manager, there are things I did that my parents did not approved.

But during

this time, the old unpleasant stimulus did not seem to reinforce me to behave well. Then, my parent resort in another approach, they did not teach me to behave by scolding me like an immature child, instead, they treated me like a mature teen and talked me out of my rebellious stage. Their reinforcement and support get me through stage five of Erosion's Theory of Psychosocial Development pretty well as now I feel that I have a strong sense of self, I am more independent and I become more mature in terms of social interaction. He group of people that I am comfortable with or with people that I am not used to.

As I mentioned before, I think I did get through the previous stage of my life, according to Erosion's theory, pretty well and I have become more mature in social interaction because I noticed that when working in group, I would not be a passive passenger, rather I would assert myself and give an active participation. I tend to take control and speak out my ideas but I will never let myself be a control freak. I do listen to what others have to say and accept others' ideas that are better than mine even though sometimes I am quite stubborn with my own ideas.

I also realized that in working in groups, the best is to make decisions on the basis of win-win situation. In the future, I think I would be a more agreeable but assertive person.

I will improve myself in terms of cooperating with people, will be more sensitive to others' point of views and readily accept the

facts that different people have different sets of skills and knowledge that I have to consider. CONSCIENTIOUSNESS Conscientiousness is the quality of being in accord with the dictates of conscience or the clear idea of what is right and wrong. My average score in the test for conscientiousness is considered high.

I believe that it is telling the truth about me because I am, most of the time, a kind of person who does things with proper planning. I rarely make decisions or do something without thinking it through.

As a child, I am blessed to be under the guidance of two great parents. Since I was a child, my parents are my role models. There is a truth behind one of the things that Bandeau stated that I totally agreed on which is people tend to imitate people that they like and respect than people that they do not. I remember an event when I was ally young, I imitated my father's act of calling my mother by her name.

At that time I was unaware of the fact that it is considered to be rude in our culture to call elders just by names, at that I point I Just imitated what my father did. But what he did after that I think served as one of the turning point of my personality development as a child.

He talked to me about the inappropriateness of my behavior and what changes the old schema of mine which was that I could imitate everything I saw. I was a conscientious person throughout my childhood, adolescence, and currently early adulthood. The reason I say this is

because, I always believed that I have a strong inner voice inside of me to guide myself.

When I was a child, it was as if I almost never commit a lie because I was taught that a lie is a sin. Even now as a young adult, even though I cannot say that I never say lies, I would always had this strong feel of guilt when I wanted to, although I can be quite successful in this endeavor. This strong sense of guilt often prevented me from lying.

This strong feeling of guilt is the unconscious part of the mind that Sigmund Freud has came up with that said to be the driving forces of our behaviors. During a child, my parents also taught me that bad behaviors will never go unpunished.

They would give punishments whenever I did something wrong. For example, during primary school when I did not perform my prayer, my dad would threatened me with a cane and it did work but on the downside, at that age I performed my prayer Just to avoid being cane.

Another example is that when I was a teenager I rarely helped my mother with house chore but she had her ways on teaching me to be more responsible in a very delicate way that it then developed my sense of responsibility and conscientiousness hat I do house chore without her order other than my own sense of responsibility.

There was a time during Standard 5, I got a C for my Mathematics. I was scold by my father and he compared me with my two older sisters whom both always scored

in this subject. L, who was originally never liked being compared with anyone then did many Mathematics exercises to prove to him that I can do it too. This is in fact one example of negative reinforcement in which the unpleasant stimulus (dislike feeling of being compared to others) is removed by the increased in response (do more Mathematics exercises).

In the end, my hardwood paid off when I got an A for Mathematics in PUPS. I felt satisfied with my effort and my success was acknowledged by everyone. The recognitions I received from others served as a positive reinforcement as I continued to obtain more academic achievements afterwards. The recognitions during my first big examination which was the PUPS also acts in according to Skinner's Operant Conditioning- a form of learning that results in voluntary responses because of favorable consequences.

The recognitions I received especially from my parents became the favorable consequences that I trivet to achieved with my voluntary response of studying hard to get more academic achievements starting from there and later in high school. It is also can be considered as a reward, and because of that reward, I repeat my behaviors because I know it will be pleasurably rewarding.

In the future, I think I will become a more conscientious person than I am now because there will be more experiences and challenges in the future life that will make me more mature.

Although along the way I may face people that could bring negative impact on me and my personality, I know I have a congruence self-concept s in the humanistic perspective of personality because I always ask the

people as. EMOTIONAL STABILITY Emotional stability is the opposite of emotional reactivity. People with high emotional stability are the ones who deal with any situations with stable emotions, even on the events that would be described as stressful and could trigger intense emotions. I scored high in this test which indicate that I am a calm person and my emotion is basically stable most of the time.

The result is no surprise to me because there were many past events in my life seem to show that and throughout my life so far.

From most of the events that I could remember and the ones that my family members recalled, I rarely make intensely emotional scenes even when I was a child. There was a time when I was about 3 or 4 years old, I was having fun playing with my older sister and I accidentally fell and bleed my forehead. While many children at that age would probably cried and frantically screamed, I did not.

Instead, being a very cool little girl I was, I only sit still while my older sister ran off to get help. To top it off, I needed stitches for that wound but I went through it amazingly calm for such little girl.

Another event was when I was in Standard One, I was left as the last one in front of the school gate, waited for my mother who was late that day to pick me up. Although I was scared to be the only one left as the day was getting late, I did not freak out but I tried to calm myself and waited loyally

at the pick-up area until my mother arrived.

Throughout my life, I usually managed to handle stressful situations without much intense emotions. I even had friends telling me that I am more matured than my age because of my calm appearance. Although I admit it to be one of my strong assets as a person, I cannot really explained of what factors that could have make me this emotionally stable.

One possibility I can think of is genetics because from what I observed, both of my parents are very calm people and since a young child I was taught to think before I speak or do anything.

This is an accordance to Bandanna's Observational Learning Theory which states that learning that occurs when an organism's response is influenced by observation of others that are called models. It also stated that people usually imitate people that they like or respect more. So it seems to fit, my parents are the most influential people throughout my life. I have always respect them for their parenting skills and I get most of my life lessons from them, therefore, it is no surprise that I make them as my model when I was little or even when I am already a young adult.

Throughout my life, I have seen and observed the effects of having an emotional outburst in social interactions and most of these scenes of what I observed were usually end up into negative outcomes while on the other hand, the scenes that involved stable emotions from both parties in a social interaction are more desirable. My observations left me with schemas of what to expect for

behaving in one way or he other. Outburst. But it usually occurs when I have no patience left to deal with that issue. Thus, I always find myself to keep distance from anything that can make me lose my patience which works like Skinner's negative reinforcement.

You removed the unpleasant stimulus. In the future, I could say that I will still be a high emotional stability person but I will also try to cope better with uncomfortable, emotional situations so that I no longer need to keep distance from something or someone that makes me uncomfortable, instead, I become a more positive person that I will never lose my temper. OPENNESS Openness to experience is may be defined as willingness to be exposed to new things and not in the usual daily routine. My score in the openness is average which indicates that I can deal willingly with new experiences but I also enjoy the plain,repetitive daily routine.

I do agree with the result because it is true that I actually willing to try new things but once in a while, I prefer the laid-back, plain routine that I always do. As a child, I was very depended to my family.

I was a shy and polite kid in my young age and I rarely explored new things by myself. I always played with my sisters and close cousins. I never had my own friends beside them until I entered kindergarten. I learned how to make friends by observing my older sisters. I was intrigued when they told me stories about their friends and schools.

I was determined to find a friend of my own.

Thus, when I was in the kindergarten, although I was not a talkative kid, I was friendly enough to make new friends. I was driven by the rewarding feeling of having friends to tell stories about that I conquered my shyness and plucked up the courage to make new friends. Like Skinner's Operant Conditioning, there were a stimulus and a response. When the response resulted into something that is rewarding, the response would have greater chance be repeated.

That was what I did. After kindergarten, I had no problem making friends, even in new places.

Although I no longer had problem in making friends during primary school and secondary school, I was never an adventurous person. I tend to follow the paths that activities in the beginning. At first I had this schema that students were supposed to only study in school and not doing other things. But as I grow older, I met friends that are more open-minded.

From them did I learned the fun of trying new things and that school was not only for formal education. I started to take up new activities such as dancing, and acting. I also tried my skills in sports.

Although I was not very bright in those areas, I had my fun trying them. I even persuaded my father to let me enter an English tuition.

There I found even more interesting people. In the English tuition class, I was a very bright student and often my teacher would praised my work and sometimes he would make me as an example for other students. My performance got me into another level where I had to mix

with students that are much older than me. I developed a feeling of competence and I found something that I was actually good at, writing English essays.

If according to Erosion's theory of Psychosocial Stages of Personality Development, I was actually doing pretty well in the fourth stage which is the Industry versus Inferiority stage.

My interactions with many different people, the support I got from my family, friends and teachers developed my self-confidence toward my own capabilities. In secondary school and beyond, I continued to be more self-daring and with the friends I mingled with at that time, I was becoming more open to new experiences. Of course, all the new experiences that I talked about are harmless and legal.

Even though I became curious of how certain illegal things feel like, I had never had intentions to actually do them. My conscience was sufficiently clear and kept me out of trouble in accordance to humanistic theorists' belief that humans are conscious and rational beings who are not dominated by unconscious, irrational needs.

Sometimes I enjoyed doing things that are routine. I enjoyed being living at the moment. My life as a university student has actually been kind of a routine but I managed to give it a hint of new things when I had the chance so it would not be too dull.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New