Performance Enhancing Drugs in Sports Essay Example

fairness of doping disciplinary measures implemented by athletic federations?

The text below presents a hypothesis.

The hypothesis (H0) suggests that athletes lack adequate knowledge about doping rules and regulations, which explains their ongoing involvement in doping activities.

H1:
Athletes are conscious of the doping regulations, therefore, they engage in doping using substances that have not been documented by WADA.

Variables

The research investigates two main factors: the athletes' understanding of doping and their position on it. It is important for individuals to have a comprehensive knowledge of the reasons and consequences of doping, including both its positive and negative effects resulting from the use of specific substances. The awareness campaign directed at athletes portrays doping as a mandatory regulation that must be followed, without emphasizing the potential physical health risks associated with it. The emphasis is placed on the unfair advantage that performance-enhancing drugs can give athletes in competitions. Many athletes have a negative view towards doping since they are not actively involved in determining the regulations related to it. As a result, they perceive the doping rules enforced by federations as punitive measures.

The research approach is being discussed.

The purpose of the study is to create a questionnaire to ascertain the perspectives of athletes on the growth of doping. Both federations and the international Olympics committee acknowledge that the implementation of doping regulations has resulted in a decline in doping incidents. Findings from the international Olympics committee medical committee indicate that less than 1.5% of tests yield positive results following athlete education on doping. Nonetheless, athlete opinions can provide a fresh outlook.

The study will be based on four identified research questions. These questions will be divided into separate parts

within the questionnaire. The questionnaire will be open-ended, allowing respondents to freely express their opinions on the listed questions. It is important to mention that only study-related inquiries will be included in the questionnaire, and no personal information of the respondents will be collected.

In the proposed study, ethical considerations are of utmost importance. This includes giving all participants an opportunity to answer research questions and allowing them the option to withdraw from the study at any time. Prior to joining the study, every individual should receive a consent form. The results of the study should only be used for academic purposes. Additionally, if feasible, athletic federations can utilize the study's findings to improve their doping regulations.

Doping can have detrimental effects on an athlete's career and also disrupt fair competition in sports, according to scholars such as Thieme and Hemmersbach (2010). Therefore, conducting a qualitative study to examine the development of doping with a focus on athletes' perspectives is necessary to gather case information. Only through qualitative research can case information be effectively collected. By using the qualitative method, the study can identify athletes' attitudes towards doping and explore the underlying factors contributing to these attitudes. In contrast, a quantitative study lacks the ability to make reliable predictions since the study respondents may not provide standardized responses.

Conclusion

The qualitative method of research is capable of establishing the construct of study respondents' perceptions on a study topic. Only through the proposed qualitative study can we discern the perspectives and viewpoints of athletes on doping. The research gap that will be investigated pertains to the attitudes athletes hold towards doping, as well as how these attitudes contribute to the

prevalence of doping in sports. The proposed study operates under the assumption that doping has persisted for over a century, despite efforts to combat it. Furthermore, ethical codes of research will be followed in the proposed study by obtaining consent from all participants prior to their involvement.

References

Gerlinger, K., Petermann, T., & Sauter, A. (2013). Gene Doping: Scientific Basis - Gateways - Monitoring. Norderstedt: Books on Demand.

The book "Comparative Sport Development: Systems, Participation and Public Policy" by Hallmann and Petry (2013) is published by Springer in New York, NY.

Hannum, E., & Fuller, B. (2006). Children's lives and schooling across societies. Amsterdam: Elsevier JAI.

Keim, M. (2014). Sport and development policy in Africa: Results of a collaborative study of selected country cases.

Mallia, L., Lazuras, L., Barkoukis, V., Brand, R., Baumgarten, F., Tsorbatzoudis, H., ; ... Lucidi, F. (2016). Doping use in sport teams: The development and validation of measures of team-based efficacy beliefs and moral disengagement from a cross-national perspective.

Psychology Of Sport ; Exercise, 25, 78-88. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.04.005

Nauright, J., ; Parrish, C. (2012). Sports around the world: History, culture, and practice. Santa Barbara, Calif: ABC-CLIO.

Paoli, L., and Donati, A. (2014). The sports doping market: Understanding supply and demand, and the challenges of their control. Springer.

Thieme, D., ; Hemmersbach, P. (2010). Doping in sports. Berlin: Springer.