Logos, Ethos, and Pathos in Mechanical Engineering Articles Essay Example
Logos, Ethos, and Pathos in Mechanical Engineering Articles Essay Example

Logos, Ethos, and Pathos in Mechanical Engineering Articles Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 4 (936 words)
  • Published: February 17, 2022
View Entire Sample
Text preview

Abstract

Mechanical Engineering is an Engineering branch that involves design, making and use of machines. These are some of the books that students majoring in Engineering use to facilitate their learning process. Some of these books have rhetorical appeal that makes them the best for learning. Dan B. Marghitu and Paul D. Ronney have succeeded in articulating the concepts of Mechanical Engineering in their books, making the concepts appear easy to comprehend. This paper describes the various rhetorical appeals that the authors have employed in presenting their works to readers. These rhetorical appeals include logos or logical reasoning that evokes a rational cognitive response from the reader, ethos or ethics, which helps the reader to trust what the author says or regard the author’s views as credible, trustworthy and competent, and finally, pathos, which signifies sympathy, empathy or emotion

...

, which is intended to evoke an emotional appeal or persuasion. This essay exemplifies the use of these rhetorical appeals by the authors to convey their message to the engineering students.

Introduction

Mechanical Engineering has had a long history spanning from the medieval era, and over the years, the discipline has grown to be one of the most widely appreciated Engineering subjects in the world. In the books, “Mechanical Engineer's Handbook” and “Basics of Mechanical Engineering: Integrating Science, Technology and Common Sense” the authors have explained concepts in the Mechanical Engineering through calculations and illustrations. The books crafted by Dan B. Marghitu and Paul D. Romney successfully employ the use of logos, ethos, and pathos. In the following aspects, I am going to discuss how the authors have achieved tremendous success in weaving together the use of logos, ethos, an

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

pathos to come up with a fine piece of work.

In the books, while Dan B. Marghitu, appeals to logos by defining different scientific terms with regards to the differences between principles in the field of Engineering, Paul D. Ronney appeals to logos by listing the companies that employ mechanical engineers. For instance, Dan B. Marghitu begins by defining characteristics vector as magnitude, orientation, and sense. Using credible sources, the author has succeeded in providing good illustrations on how to solve problems in mechanical Engineering.

Quotations and citations of facts and naming of the credible contributor also play the role of ethos in these reads. All throughout the texts, Dan B. Marghitu and Paul D. Ronney, have cited authors whose works inspired these authors to come up with the detailed concepts of their books. The information and arguments they illustrate using credible sources makes their work not only informative but also professional. Through their use of scientific terminology, Dan B. Marghitu, and Paul D. Ronney build their ethos by demonstrating expertise in the area of Mechanical Engineering (Marghitu, 2001).

Dan B. Marghitu being a professor in Department of Mechanical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, has a rich and vast knowledge in Mechanical Engineering which makes his arguments and illustrations trustworthy and credible. Also, Paul D. Ronney being a professor in Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering University of Southern California shows that he has vast knowledge in Mechanical Engineering (Ronney, 2005).The language the authors use exemplifies the level of knowledge and experience they have in Mechanical Engineering. Also, the use of appropriate vocabulary and correct terminologies tells the reader how professional the authors are. In this effect, the

authors are able to build credibility and trustworthiness that goes a long way in helping the audience understand and accept the facts and arguments.

In the books, there are instances when the authors concede to the opposition and argue in a manner that elicits a morally and ethically likable personality in the eyes of the reader, who is a Mechanical Engineering student. The authors’ argument of how much the formulae are simplified in their books is a very persuasive appeal to pathos. In an emotional tone, the authors describe how the role of formula and concepts in their books have changed the way Mechanical Engineering student views some of the fundamental concepts in the field.

With regards to emotional tone, Dan B. Marghitu explains the achievements that the Mechanical Engineering has had over the years with excitement. These compelling arguments and statements are a clear appeal to pathos and are able to evoke an emotional response from the readers. By critically reading the books, one is able to identify the tone of the author as compelling and exciting emotions. His emphasis on the importance of the Mechanical Engineering in the design of machines is a clear indication of how passionate the author is about Mechanical Engineering. Although the pathos appeals have not been exhaustively used in this article, the author has been able to blend the different concepts in an emotionally compelling manner.

Conclusion

Based on the above discussion, it is true that Dan B. Marghitu and Paul D. Ronney have succeeded in using logos, ethos, and pathos in their work and interwoven the three to come up with books that are not only informative but also educative. Based

on their rich background in the Mechanical Engineering, they know best the influence of Mechanical Engineering. In their work, they have explicitly discussed how Mechanical Engineering came to being a simple subject. As such, it can be confidently argued that both authors have achieved tremendous success in weaving together the use of logos, ethos, and pathos to come up with fine pieces of art.

References

  1. Marghitu, D. B. (2001). MechanicalEngineer's Handbook. New York: ACADEMIC PRESS.
  2. Ronney, P. D. (2005). Basics Of Mechanical Engineering: Integrating Science, Technology And Common Sense. New York: Adventure Press. Retrieved 10 17, 2016, from http://ronney.usc.edu/ame101/
Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New