I Will Be Better At Estimating Essay Example
I Will Be Better At Estimating Essay Example

I Will Be Better At Estimating Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 3 (640 words)
  • Published: August 18, 2017
  • Type: Essay
View Entire Sample
Text preview

I believe that year 10 pupils will be better at estimating the length of a stick than year 7 pupils are. I think this because year 10 pupils have more experience, and also I felt I was better at estimating in year 10 than I was in year 7. Plan all my data in my experiment was collected for me. A teacher went into every class in years 7 and 10 and held up a stack of 1.36m horizontally.

The pupils then had to estimate how long they thought that stick was. The only piece of information that the pupils were given was that a door is about 2 meters high. To see if the year 10's are better than the year 7's are at estimating length I will work out the mean, median, mode, and st

...

andard deviation. I will then draw tables and graphs for year 10 and year 7. I have to make sure that I take an equal sample of both year 7 and year 10; I will take a random sample of 20% of each year.

This will mean that I will have 72 data values in all. My aim is to be able to gather enough information so that I can prove my hypothesis true or false. I will have to compare the averages of my results from year 7 and year 10. This will then give me a better idea of the difference between them both. If this shows that year 10's estimates are closer than year 7's then I will have proven my hypothesis right. There are 182 data values in year 7 and there are 180 in year 10.

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

I have decided to take 20% of each of these this will give me a sample size of 36 from each year. I have chosen to gather my information by using stratified sampling.

From processing the data I see that year 7 with a mean of 1.29m is better at estimating length than the year 10's with a mean of 1.53m are. Although the year 10's mean was only 0.

17m away from the actual length of the stick, this could indicate that if the data was processed again the year 10's might be better at estimating length. The year 10's had a higher standard deviation than the year 7's this indicates that some of the year 10's data values were either very high or very low. The range confirms this, as there is a difference of 3.85 between the highest and lowest values. This tells us that this group could have been completely changed by 1 person either estimating too high or too low.

From my tables, I can see that most of year 7's estimations were in the 1.40 L 1.60 group and most of the year 10's estimations were n the 1.20 L 1.40. This tells us that the year 10's estimated more values in the right group but the very high values distorted the overall mean.

I conclude that year 7's in this case were better at estimating length than the year 10's were. This however could change if the sampling were to be done again. Evaluation thinks that I produced a valid and suitable investigation. I made sure that all my sampling was done fairly and randomly. I also took into consideration my aim

throughout my experiment so that I could perform it suitably. I feel there are things that could have been done to improve my investigation.

I think that when gathering the information pupils could have been asked to do this separately as they might have copied what someone else had put. From the data values, you can see that some people just put down the height that they were told a door was. This maybe could have been stopped if they were also told they weren't allowed to put down the height of a door as their answer. This is what I would do if the data were collected and processed all over again.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New