Governments Should Spend Money on Improving Public Transportation Essay Example

previous paragraph if people have good transportation, cars are not necessary for them, so it reduces the number of people using their own car and decreases the carbon dioxide which is burned into the atmosphere. Building new roadways will benefit to people who use private car and carrier companies; on the other hand it will cause environmental problems. One of the environmental problems is forest destruction. In order to build a new road, workers have to destroy natural resources, and the most natural resources which being destroyed are forest areas.

In the end, people in the area which the forest are being destroyed will get negative effects. Another advantage of improving public transportation is that good transportation reduces stress from traffic problems which cause of aggressive drivers. Right now, big cities in many countries are facing a traffic jam because people prefer using their own cars rather than using public transportation. For example, there is heavy traffic in Bangkok, which is the capital of Thailand, where I come from.

Even though we have many kinds of transportation, such as buses, express trains, subways, and boats, it is not good as people expect because buses are too old, and express trains are limited in some areas in Bangkok. Also, many areas, buses are only one option. As a result, people decide to use private transportation, and it causes a traffic jam especially during the rush hours. I have a strongly believe that if Thai government invested in public transportation, people would be happy to use buses, express trains, and subways, and I would not see the highways were huge parking lots.

There are many advantages of improving public transportations;

however, many supporters of highways and road construction say that the constructions help growing nation economy. When government starts the highway construction, they create jobs not only workers but also other businesses in construction industries. Another reason to support highways and roads construction is to improve the quality of life for people who live in suburban areas because they spend less time driving into cities (Highway & Motorway Fact Book, 1996).

When looking at those two supporter points, it might be true that the constructions improve economic growth and improve the quality of life. However, one thing that the supporters did not think about was environment. As mentioned the construction of roads and highways destroy a large area of natural resources, so I think investing in public transportation has the same benefit as investing in roads and highways construction, and the government does not have to destroy natural areas.

There is no reason why the government does not improve public transportation. To sum up, investment in public transportation services can encourage people to use public transportation. In the same time, we can avoid environmental problems because people stop using their own cars and road workers stop cutting forest to build new roads. In addition, people do not have to face traffic jams.