Causes for Public Trust or Distrust of the Federal Government Essay Example

host of other policies, propositions, bills, and acts either passed or in line for approval aimed to assist the recovery process includes Health Care reform, Education, Mortgage crisis resolution, combating Al-Qaeda, and Domestic policy.

Bodies like the NAACP and ACLU have successfully pushed for laws that ban schools from making students recite The Pledge of Allegiance and prayers, due to concerns over discrimination or racism. Critics argue that such practices can cause emotional harm to individuals from various ethnic backgrounds or undocumented immigrants. Though not wholly prohibited in educational institutions, there are students who opt out of participating in the pledge. Some even disrespect the flag by displaying inappropriate hand gestures or deliberately mispronouncing the words.

It seems contradictory to express empathy for those who oppose the pledge yet disregarding those who choose patriotism. The Pledge of Allegiance symbolizes the hardships experienced by our founding fathers in building our nation, along with the bravery exhibited by our past and present military personnel. It denotes the unity of this extraordinary country. Globally, the United States is recognized as the land of opportunity, hopes, and equality. People travel from distant places to escape oppressive regimes and to experience and cherish the American Dream.

The First Amendment in the United States constitution provides its residents with freedom of speech and religion. It functionally protects them from being forced to adopt beliefs they do not subscribe to. The idea of obliging individuals to respect the flag or engage in a pledge is viewed as tyrannical by many Americans who oppose autocratic governance from their own administration. Likewise, it's unreasonable to insist that non-US citizens recite the

Pledge of Allegiance or participate in religious practices that conflict with their cultural or faith customs.

Noteworthy government programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Cash for Clunkers are infamous due to their financial mismanagement leading to deficit financing. Although the Welfare Program is not bankrupt, its frequent abuse puts immense pressure on the U.S economy. This dependency largely originates from state policies. A shift in strategy by the federal government from wholly sustaining family incomes to providing monthly grants could significantly ease the financial strain on taxpayers.

The national budget has exceeded its limit, leading lawmakers to seek out cost-cutting strategies which typically involve states downsizing their employees, like teachers and highway maintenance crews. There could be improvements made to the welfare system through the initiation of a workfare scheme, enhancing employment rates, and preventing misuse across generations of families. This much-required scheme should primarily serve the aged and intellectually impaired. Being a beneficiary of charity is not a constitutional entitlement; no obligation lies on society to provide for its healthy members.

Nonetheless, each person bears an essential right to advance, a feat that is unachievable solely through the acceptance of gratuitous aids. Striving for achievement necessitates proactive endeavors and it's not merely granted devoid of effort. "Your competence is determined by your abilities; your decisions are swayed by inspiration; and the effectiveness of their realization relies on your disposition", notes Lou Holtz. Welfare is unquestionably vital. The bureaucracy inherently operates at a sluggish tempo and lacks efficiency. It doesn't react promptly to urgent matters such as the substantial increase in unauthorized immigrants infiltrating U.S borders daily.

Immoral companies are creating difficulties

for the everyday American blue-collar worker to sustain their position in the employment market due to their misconduct. These organizations manipulate the system by prioritizing substantial profits over fair wages, often overlooking healthcare or compensation benefits for undocumented immigrants. In light of current low wage levels, it becomes increasingly challenging for an average person to survive without help such as welfare, food stamps or public aid. Nonetheless, significant assistance may be provided by the Green Energy Policy promoted by the president.

S. is advocating for a strategy centered on rejuvenating the numerous U.S jobs lost in the economic crisis, with an intention to ensure a thriving future for forthcoming generations. The primary emphasis is on green energy, which not only supports environmental conservation via more eco-friendly and secure power alternatives but also aids in reducing our excessive reliance on foreign fossil fuels, thereby lessening associated strategic and financial dangers. It's thought that this shift towards green energy could be crucial in avoiding dependence on overseas fossil fuels while concurrently stimulating job growth.

Contrary to common perception, as evidenced by Spain's economy, green energy will not be a viable solution but rather a limitless financial drain costing millions or even billions for significantly reduced returns. The key issue with "renewable energy" lies in its efficiency- the energy return from most "renewable" sources exceeds the lifespan of the equipment used to generate it, relative to the cost of establishing such equipment for "green energy" production. Far from creating jobs and strengthening the economy, it would actually result in job cuts- for each job generated in the green sector, we stand to lose 2 traditional jobs.

Furthermore, imposing restrictions on Gun ownership could create challenges for criminals seeking access to firearms.

The suggestion is to increase the monitoring and regulation of all firearm sales, thereby broadening the ATFE's jurisdiction over gun ownership within a particular region. This move would consequently foster a heightened sense of security among ordinary citizens, comforted by the fact that individuals with unpredictable behavior patterns do not have access to firearms. The implementation of more stringent laws and requirements such as establishing age restrictions in households, obligatory safe handling instructions, ensuring every firearm has sufficient locking mechanisms and sequentially numbered ammunition can significantly enhance law enforcement's capacity to trace and capture culprits. For many years, there has been a common belief among our opponents that launching an attack on American soil is ill-advised due to our population's widespread proficiency with guns and readiness to employ these arms against any foreign invasion.

The basic right of self-protection and safeguarding one's family is ingrained in our historical roots. Such was the essence of this principle, that our forefathers deemed it necessary to be instated within the Second Amendment of the Constitution. Back then, due to lesser centralization and potential delay in help, individuals had a greater responsibility for their own safety. Fast forward to today's urbanized world where although law enforcement assistance might be just minutes away, there may still exist situations posing immediate danger where swift action is needed.

Possessing arms can serve as a deterrent to many potential criminals, making them think twice before attacking someone who could be armed in public. Perpetrators usually target individuals perceived as weak and unprotected. Simultaneously, several media

outlets frequently expose instances of governmental inefficiency or corruption. The Constitution along with the Bill of Rights also act as checks on government authority, aiding in preventing abuse and malpractice.

Remember that the government is composed of elected representatives chosen by the American populace. As with any other leadership position, such as the president, military commanders or heads of private entities, they have a duty to make timely and informed choices for those they serve. Of course, not all decisions they take will be universally embraced. Additionally, public perception about these choices can vary due to insufficient awareness or understanding concerning specific resolutions passed by these leaders.