Difference Between Love And Sex Theology Religion

essay A+

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

Peter Bertocci has explained the human experience of sex and explains the value of sex as portion of the significance of life. Sing sex an terminal in itself Peter argues that more profound satisfaction is felt when the normal experience of sex lecherousness is non chiefly an terminal in itself but a symbolic look of other values. Bertocci farther explains the challenge in love which he explains through his patterned advance of love in which matrimony and its values are highlighted as an essentialness to protect sex and love. He argues that sex, love, matrimony, household, and societal duty are the cardinal factors that conveying stableness in the society and nurture the values morality. He considers love as a an indispensable component to populate, otherwise it will be a mere being non populating gleefully. He argues for the topographic point of matrimony in society and emphasizes on the self regeneration of the spouses through this fresh relationship.

In my sentiment he truly draws on personal experience and has a closed minded position. I disagree and will give grounds and statements in my essay as to why I think that Bertocci narrates a narrative of an ideal state of affairs.

Difference between Love and Sexual activity:

Psychoanalysis asserts that love and sex can ne’er be of same beginning and character due to differences of decisive nature. Love and sex must be analyzed in their ain horizon and in their purest signifiers. Sexual activity is related to biology related to some being ; love gives an emotional touch and a mark of person ‘s ideas. Sexual activity is used to extinguish the tense attitude ; love can be used as an flight caprine animal from one ‘s ain failure. Sexual activity satisfies a individual physically ; love gives felicity. Sexual activity has a broader significance ; particular significance is shown through love. Nature ‘s call can be answered through sex ; civilization is satisfied through love. Sexual activity is known to 1000000s ; 1000000s have non even heard of love affair or love. Sexual activity is arbitrary ; love is ever directed to person. Sexual activity gives relaxation ; love prepare the personality. The gustatory sensation and pleasance of sex can non be called subsequently while love can be recalled anytime even in ideas if the lover is non physically present. Sexual activity is an act ; love is religious. Sexual activity avidity is for a short clip whereas love is uninterrupted heat. ( Reik, New York: Grove Press. 1945 ) [ 1 ] .

Can Love and Lust be combined?

( Reik, p. 19 ) , observes that if love and sex are combined, it is really hard to measure that which has the most portion or portion, to be precise, during a sexual intercourse. I believe that it is strictly dependent on our perceptual experience. It is our ain head and organic structure that drives us to a peculiar point where we need to believe that what should be combined and what should be separated. I believe that there are ways in which sex without love can be as joyous, fruitful and comforting as sex with love. So, the inquiry as to the combination of lecherousness and love, one can non state that which is more ruling but one can state is that rough signifier of sex is generated after disassociating love from sex.

Sexual activity with Love:

What Bertocci has explained about love is that through sex with love one gives in everything but Rollo May s Love and Will ( New York: Dell Publishing Co.. 1969 ) , says that one will ever keep something back until the act is personal, and if we use this word personal alternatively of love, the context of sex is broadened and sex can be joyful even the spouses are non lovers. May farther argues that keeping off something does non intend that sex will non be a pure sex. Harmonizing to May ( p. 311 ) , relationship and familiarity are much more of import factors than simply holding sex with a individual because of the impersonal society and it is unknown that the act of sex will fulfill the needed demands of relationship and familiarity. But what one can state harmonizing to May ‘s stance that through love one is absorbed in another and isolation can be overcome through this. The sarcasm of love is that one is at the same clip losing oneself and absorbing the other in him. Mays writings show a deficiency of apprehension of how satisfaction can be achieved through sex without love.

Analysis of Sexual activity with Love:

Like May many people in this universe are incognizant of the possibility of sex being a loving act even without being lovers to each other. As I mentioned earlier this is a traditional or closed head position that sex without love is non every bit fruitful as sex with love. I reiterate my position that Sexual activity without love allows the spouses to hold a more restful feeling. Contrasting to what bertocci, I would state that sex with love taking to a more chaining relationship which leads to taking each other ‘s hurting, so puting your life in the basket of matrimony which will set down your life in the raising of kids. Bertocci farther asks you to nurture the society through all these predating Acts of the Apostless of yours. Sadly, a true and a happy relationship of sex have been destroyed by the choke offing positions of authors such as May and Bertocci. Sexual activity should be as free and actuating as a clear sky is available to the bird that goes high in strength and liquors to hold a broader overview of the elaboratenesss of this universe. This feeling takes me higher and regenerates the true spirit of life and makes me see what the trusters of sex with love can non see or visualise in their ideas.

Sexual activity without Love:

( Russell Vannoy, Buffalo: Prometheus, 1980 ) gives some of the illustrations from the documents of his pupils. I would wish to advert a few ; pleasuring my lover leaves me pleasance less as the head is devoted to his satisfaction, therefore upseting the whole construct of sex. The deeper you get involve in other individual and as the other is absorbed in you, the more a individual is ceased to be a separate individual, which is perfectly non encouraging and every bit non satisfactory. The lovers gets cocksure and sometimes the miss does non experience horny, so if the lover pushes her and she refuses, is she acquiring selfish. I would state no because this might non hold been the instance with a alien whom she did non love, a alien can non force you for something and one is at autonomy to state no to stranger without worrying to put off him. Once a lover knows what you are capable of in the bed, he wants repeat whereas a new individual will be attracted to the same presentation. Selflessness is common among lovers whereas no such forfeit is required to be done during sex without non-lovers.

( Casler, New York: Behavioral Publications, 1973 ) , has argued that love is needed to fulfill the demands of personal insecurity. These demands are dictated to by the social force per unit area and those without it are non considered an active portion of this so called moral society. Casler ‘s position shows that people acquiring loved or love person are merely seeking to derive self-worth. With this attitude in head the sex is most unfulfilling. Sing the older ages when adult females were non respected, how can males give regard to them in the form of love? This has aroused adult females to compose the most unfavorable judgment on love.

( Robert Solomon, Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1976 ) , writes that sexual brushs with aliens are the most hearty buttocks there is fear, guilt and expectancy. Conversely sex with those we know and love is much less fulfilling as the wonts and reactions are known to each other which, nullifies the singularity among the spouses. Moralists paints the image of sex with a non-lover as petroleum and animalistic. They still have their position of holding successful sex with merely the 1s you love and the other sex is ne’er pure.

Giving justification to love is merely every bit hypocrite as really making lip service during rough sex in love ; one says that if I do n’t love her I am working her, so he loves to do his sex justified is merely another signifier of lip service. The advocators of sex with love has non allowed the people to believe to halt being selfishly loving others to warrant the society ‘s value system. Once this selfish behaviour is outsmarted, merely so a true loving act of sex could emerge without romantically being involved in the other spouse. Many hubbies perform rough sex and married womans are left unrealized. The ground is that married womans want a sensuous sex while work forces want manfully, lustful sex which can non be achieved as they get involved in each other and can non force for the demands and now when married can non alter hubbies. This state of affairs leaves both thirsty for existent experience in sex.

Social Blessing:

Society ‘s blessing is considered necessary and the sex must be given the acquiescence of the pure spirit of love. Otherwise the sex would animalistic and soil. If this option is considered so, even in sex with love the spouses remain unrealized and they are non self-generated and guilt free. I believe that society ‘s construct must non be involved in sex relationships, as it is merely to beef up the establishment of matrimony. Marriage will surely do the experience of sex arduous although the society gives the acquiescence of piousness but will finally do the people who make the society unfulfilled with respects to their sexual satisfaction.

Analysis of Sexual activity without Love:

I strongly believe that sex without love is much more fruitful and joyous than the sex with love. The world is still that sex opens the doors for the people to happiness and satisfaction but when love comes and knocks the door and clinchs sex, it all of a sudden engulfs sex and convinces to travel to the following phase of sex with love. I reject this and state that this encompassing is merely like traveling into a war which one choose for its ain ego without any ground.


The sex without love is the superior, mature and natural attitude which 1 must follow. The society ‘s regeneration is so laid in the foundations of autonomy and freedom of pick which can merely be exercised when 1 has no limitation to follow a peculiar agenda or guidelines while holding sex. I strongly believe in holding sex without love for which I have argued in my paper after taking a position of the assorted facets of what people want and what people face after taking a incorrect determination of set downing at a lover ‘s corner.

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member