Compare and Contrast the Cosmological and Ontological Arguments Essay Example
Compare and Contrast the Cosmological and Ontological Arguments Essay Example

Compare and Contrast the Cosmological and Ontological Arguments Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 2 (282 words)
  • Published: September 6, 2017
  • Type: Essay
View Entire Sample
Text preview

"Why do I exist? What created the universe? Does God exist? " Questions which have challenged philosophers for many years. The Cosmological and Ontological arguments attempt to answer these questions. Through this essay I hope to explore the methodology and formation of the arguments in their early stages, and their development through the years.

I will also explore the extension of the arguments in the modern era, for both supporters and critics of the arguments. The modern era provides a wide range of developments to the arguments, and I will explore the ideas and thoughts of many 20Th Century philosophers.At the core of this essay is the two very different approaches of the arguments, the a posteriori based Cosmological, and the a priori based Ontological 1. The two approaches of the arguments are based around

...

the a priori and a posteriori reasoning.

An a priori arguments is one where the truth of the proposition does not depend on prior experience. It relies on knowledge collected outside of our own experiences. This is said by some to be an innate knowledge. The ontological argument is based around this reasoning.The basis of the argument itself depends on ones understanding of the nature of God. The argument attempts to prove Gods expistence through the meaning of the word GOD.

The Cosmological argument on the other hand, is a a posteriori based argument. They argue that the truth of a proposition may only be known to be true after empirical knowledge is utilised to prove the statement true or false. 2 The two arguments were both first begun by the classical Greek Philosophers Aristotle and Plato. Plato argued on

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

of the Cosmological arguments earliest forms. Learn the difference between scientific management and administrative managementHe argued that "the power to produce movement logically comes before the power to receive it and pass it on"3 This basically means that if there if movement, then something has to have caused this. This could not logically go on for infinity, so there has to be a single solitary being that caused this chain of events. This he calls the First Mover. Aristotle also believed in the Prime mover, the uncaused cause, the original cause.

In this respect the two arguments are very similar. The main thing that Aristotle really contributed towards the Ontological argument was Syllogisms.He developed the concept, and the use of deductive arguments. The argument is deductive also, and completely rational, so therefore Aristotles Syllogism was the choice to use. So both arguments take with them the ideas and concepts of classic Greek philosophers, albeit in very differing ways.

The ontological argument attempts to suggest the existence of there being a creator, or God. There are two main contributors to the Classical Ontological argument for the existence of God. These were St Anselm and Descartes. The main creators of the Cosmological were Aquinas and Leibniz.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New