Where Have the Good Men Gone by Kay Hymowitz Essay Example

argument.Hymowitz refers to a comedian's opinion, an opinion that would definitely have been exaggerated - comedians are meant to make fun of others. Indeed, the readers will not trust a comedian's opinions. In addition to that, throughout her article, Hymowitz incorrectly correlates the hobbies of "aging frat boys", as she calls them, to be things that are immature.

The author's exaggerated depiction of men is supported by referring to the movie "Knocked Up", which shows a stereotypical group of irresponsible young men causing trouble. To a certain extent, I do agree with Hymowitz that "men in their 20s hang out in a sort of limbo".This cultural reference, however, is not a valid argument at all. This particular example has not been ranked in the top 10 American movies since it was released.

Furthermore, according to the top 10 movies of the 90s and 00s, none of them were based on a stereotypical representation of young men. Hence, this proves that the majority of people are not concerned whether men are "grubby slackers or not". Hymowitz's hyperbole was perhaps intended to further accentuate her point, that men are immature. Yet, an exaggerated argument proves the author's naivety and desperation, thus making the readers rely less on her point of view.Furthermore, the article's definition of men as "slackers" and being "maladroit" is not justified.

A study from 2007, by Helmuth Nyborg, showed that males aged 17 and 18 had an average IQ of 4. 2 points higher than the females and that males are more intelligent and achieving more academically, proving that men were not "slackers". Hymowitz believes that women "are the first sex", superior to men.

Her use of statistics - "among American ages 25 to 34, 34% of the women now have a bachelor's degree but just 27% of men" - may prove how women are more diligent, hardworking and focused, and that men do not possess such qualities.Yet, this reference to data does not corroborate her viewpoint she is trying to make.

Having grades that are marginally lower does not necessarily make someone a "maladroit geek" or a "grubby" slacker". For instance, Bill Gates - the founder of one of the most successful companies - surprisingly did not have outstanding grades in school. Hymowitz has to ask herself whether her point, that women are the "first sex" just because they are smarter, is justified. Also, she doesn't mention her source of data.The lack of supporting details she brings into her argument suggests that Hymowitz is not confident of her viewpoint. Nevertheless, she continues to commend how women "also have more confidence and drive.

.. as most professors believe it"; men don't possess this "confidence" to be as successful in work places. At this point, Hymowitz attempts to fortify her argument by relating to the opinions of experts. Nonetheless, the vague statement "as most professors believe it" is notable. Her constant generalization of such statements does not help, but worsen, the reliability of this article.

This imprecision and vagueness may initially have started from her lack of confidence and her obstinacy to yield the fact that women, indeed, are not the "first sex". As is clearly shown, this argument originated from a falsehood, where the author tried hard to make the argument sound coherent. I can only conclude that Hymowitz's myopic interpretation

of men as "aging frat boys" is unconvincing, flawed and discordant. Hymowitz does not have a coherent idea of what she is arguing about - it certainly seems that her article consists of only the remnants of her illogical point of view.Kay S.

Hymowitz manages to execute her argument with some valid evidence. But even if some of her points may be true, her overall argument is evidently effete. Angrily reading her article, her opinions are very different my personal opinions. Therefore I strongly feel that her article does not correctly describe the average men in their 20's.

Hymowitz states that too many men are living in a new kind of extended adolescence. However, as a teenage boy, I strongly disagree with Hymowitz's myopic, prejudiced and unproven interpretation of the young men, which I do not believe has been fully justified.