Paragraph-The risks from genetically modified food Essay Example

become concerning due to environmental degradation. Although some young people may believe that individual car ownership does not significantly contribute to pollution concerns, the cumulative effect of multiple cars can indeed cause these problems - particularly if every young person has their own vehicle. Thus, prioritizing environmental protection becomes necessary when considering the negative impacts of cars on air quality and noise levels. Additionally, excessive cars on roads lead to traffic congestion that worsens transportation issues. Many officers use cars to commute to work.
The text brings attention to the negative effects of young individuals owning their own cars, such as traffic congestion, longer travel time, increased accident risk, and negative impacts on mood and productivity. It suggests reconsidering car ownership due to its cost, contribution to pollution, and inconvenience caused by traffic congestion. Additionally, it mentions a line graph illustrating the growth in the proportion of individuals aged 65 and over in three countries from 1940 to 2040. Initially, Korea experienced a slight decrease while Norway and the UK saw an increase. However, by 2030, Korea had a higher proportion of people aged 65 and over compared to the other two countries. Overall, the graph predicts an upward trend in the percentage of elderly population across different countries during this time period.

Another topic addressed is whether schools should have the authority to expel troublesome students. In China's government schools, this policy is implemented for mischievous students. There are supporters who argue that these students should be expelled as they cause trouble and display unruly behavior. On the other hand, opponents believe that expulsion is inappropriate since these students are immature and incapable of taking responsibility

for their actions. They also highlight that expulsion deprives them of education which does not contribute towards improving their behavior.Both sides of the argument have valid points regarding misbehaving students in China, particularly in larger class sizes. These students often disrupt the classroom environment by chatting or using their cell phones instead of paying attention to the teacher. Their disruptive behavior can also influence others to behave similarly. Many of these students lack maturity and are easily swayed by peer pressure, which can lead to accidents as a consequence of their misconduct. When faced with reprimands from teachers or parents, these mischievous students often react with anger and feel neglected by others, resulting in some resorting to fighting or causing trouble for attention-seeking purposes.

As a solution, some propose banning troublesome students from attending schools. However, critics argue that this would be unfair since these young individuals may not have developed enough maturity or responsibility due to parental indulgence. Instead, they believe that these students should be given opportunities for personal growth through engaging activities. Prohibiting troublemaking students from schools would deprive them of an essential education necessary for their development.It is believed that denying mischievous students access to education by expelling them from government schools would hinder their excellent educational opportunities. Moreover, it is unlikely that expulsion would lead to a change in behavior; instead, these students may become idle in society and struggle to find good jobs. Opponents of government schools argue against expelling mischievous students as they believe it would be detrimental for societal well-being. On one hand, some argue that expelling such students can be beneficial as they may disrupt classes, set

negative examples, and potentially cause accidents. However, others strongly oppose this idea due to concerns about the immaturity of these students and the potential loss of education without any improvement in behavior. Both viewpoints on this matter have strong opinions.

Regarding the process of producing cement for construction purposes shown in the diagrams: Initially, limestone and clay are crushed into a powder using a crusher. This powder is then mixed together in a mixer and heated in a rotting heater. The final step involves grinding the mixture in a grinder and packaging it into bags for use.
In contrast, when creating concrete for construction purposes, 15% cement, 10% water, 25% sand, and 50% gravel are combined in a concrete mixer.Ultimately, the completion of concrete production highlights its differences from cement production. Concrete production involves fewer steps and is less complex compared to cement production, although it requires more materials.