Academic Theory Verses Experiences in the Security Forces Essay Example
Firstly we should understand the meaning of success as far as security is concerned, to be able to improve it. A security troop cannot determine its output regarding sales or profit thus it must set goals, these may involve curbing loss or preventing security failure (Bowlby2005). A failure in security can be defined as an action that gives a standard the security system is organized to prevent the public.
On other hand success can be defined as organizing cost effectively within a given budget, obtaining results at low financial value and improving the organization's strategic goal. According to Ayoob (1995) a security officer may also set metrics that evaluate department activities and their effects toward the organization, such as the integrity of equipment and stock, activity of security staff and the use of equipment, changes and effects of crime incidents and
...lastly, financial activities of the organization against its budget. Successful Security Management can also be observed as, a proactive risk management ability which can mitigate threats to the organization (Blanchard 2003). Also, success can be referred as a mixture of the above; performing against goals aligned to corporate objectives, delivering against metrics and giving the performance to others within the department. This will be the definition used by many researchers who has done the study. Another argument of ‘professionalism' in the field of corporate security has, at best, taken upon dictionary definitions of what professionalism means.
In fact, a broad sociological body of work exists which is related to the study of professions and professional advantages: why it is filtered and how it is achieved (Booth, 1994). It is the work of this thesis to draw upon
that system of work to establish where corporate security stands regarding its goals to be considered as a profession and what it must do to improve its claim to ‘proper' professional standards. However, as discussed in the study of the security management, this body of sociological has never been substantiated by any academic research. The research conducted by security corporate into the state of safety in the US gave different information on the anecdotal pessimism and reported that corporate security as a business action was in fact well rated and influentially sited in most security department (Gastil, 1990). Stanley (2013) explains that the work of security researchers serves as an example of the dangers of ‘perceived wisdom' being obtained for granted in the field of security management. And with this in mind, the main goal of this research will be to add depth to the understanding of the current state of corporate security by conducting the first qualitative, academic research of the status of the corporate security occupation ever undertaken in the developed countries.
My project thus focuses on the investigation of what kinds of transition difficulties military officers share with traditional freshman students, what kinds they share with university students, and what kinds they alone encounter in the classroom (Devine, 1996). I will largely focus on those pedagogical approaches and composition theories that aim at the relationship between language use and culture to give answers about how the military molds student-veterans' understandings of learning in general and language and writing in particular; also, I will consider how those understandings might relate to classroom activities (Nye, 1987). How will military officer experiences of working and learning
in the highly structured environment of a hierarchic, military culture and traditional believes affect his ability to adjust to the new culture of others in the college classroom as a new student, where he must expect privilege without having any. When I advise the employers on improving military recruiting programs, a veteran's level of education is an area that generates a lot of issues (Martin, & Owen, 2010).. I hear time and again from the recruiting team "where can we get the ones who have a bachelor?" or "we are looking for recruits because we realized they are the ones who have degrees." Luckily, a majority of officers come through a college commissioning program, like the Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) or a police training camp. Then, yes, they have a degree and a recommendation.
But officers only make up about thirty percent of the total military; the other seventy percent are non-military members, whose level of education varies. Some are high school graduates, and others have master's degrees, and everything included there between the education sectors (Schumacher, 2003). The more someone serves in the military field, the higher the chance they have to complete or are very close to completing a four-year degree. Still, some employers are not contented. "All of our positions require at least a bachelor's." Hiring top ranks officers believe that they gain something extra concerning talent and experience than hiring someone who has completed a four-year degree. A few decades ago there was an article in US News and world report that highlighted this trend of employers requiring a four-year degree as a minimal qualification for public and private jobs.
The author
realized that the young woman who worked for him to check out his rental car had a bachelor's degree. He thought to himself "What is hard about inspecting a vehicle for damage, filling some paperwork, and detecting mileage that requires four years of advanced education? Nothing, he answered to himself." Curiously, he contacted the company's Human Resource department and discovered that, other than an exception for military and police experience, all people hired into this position had to have at least a bachelor's. In fairness, there are some jobs that require a degree, such as doctors, engineers, Certified Public Accountants, lawyers, nurses, pilot, and teaching positions. In those cases, the degree is the main requirement to be licensed or approved to the job. But what about the other jobs that does not require the same qualification? The truth is, in a busy labor market, employers can be choosier when deciding what the minimum criteria are for a given job.
The issue is, despite efforts to be more flexible and diversified, many organizations still insist on a degree for most positions, which automatically makes the pool to the approximately twenty percent of the US population has at least a four-year degree. A population that, by and large, had the financial ability to obtain a degree, and a system that prepared them to meet college and university acceptance criteria and to complete their system of education. On the other hand: a population that is not as flexible and diversified as it could be. I continue to mobilize and urge employers to consider military experience as at least equal to a four-year degree.
I have collected their responses to the
question: "Why do their positions require a minimum of a bachelor's degree?" The main reasons given are listed below, and I have provided my argument as to why the military experience has to be considered of the same qualities sought by employers: firstly, Knowledge; having a degree shows that you have demonstrated the basic understanding of an area of study. A person might have eighteen to sixteen weeks of experience in that area of study if they had internships or attachment. Secondly, Experience; after completing an enlistment means that you have spent between two to twelve consecutive months learning how to handle a particular occupation. For example, law enforcement, supply, human resources, business chain, and that you have performed it well enough for the two to three years that followed the necessary training to maintain employment.
If the person handles that job, accordingly there would be proof of promotions and awards. Thirdly, Perseverance; remaining committed to a goal and succeeding, University education is hard. No one is there to push you get up in the morning and monitor you to class and to force you to do your assignments and turn in your homework without fail. Ideally, a student will knuckle down and obtain the degree in four years. Committing yourself to a goal and succeeding is a hard task.
Drill corporals are in your face every second of every day breaking you down to build you safely. For those that survive training and boot camp, actual military service runs them ragged, exercises, with training, deployments and long hours of hard experiences. Joining the military is voluntary but not compulsory, and by enlisting a person signs a
contract. Come high water or hell, most officers who join military complete their contract because it is their personal obligation to serve their country accordingly in whatever capacity they can.
In fact choosing to work in the military is choosing a tough lifestyle, and these choices could have made other, perhaps easier, choices. Fourthly, Analytical skills; students spend many hours in class reading materials and discussing the meaning and the impacts of what was read and how it is applied to other situations. When their analysis is correct students attain an "A" and when they analysis is incorrect students get an "C" or even worse results (Snyder, 1999). Fifth, Analytical skills; many hours are spent on deployments of military officers in chaotic situations, compiling information, comparing data, discussing the meaning and effects of what has been gathered and how it could affect other circumstances. When their analysis is correct, military officers obtain their target and when they are incorrect officers and citizens could die.
Sixth, Communication skills; course work needs that, you write papers explaining your understanding of the material and creating well-explained arguments for a certain position in the job. College work also requires that you present information to the class or teacher orally or through a presentation. Staff work in the military field requires that you write papers discussing your understanding of difficulties in real-life situations and making well thought out arguments for a course of action to take place. Officials work also involves writing policy papers and synthesizing complex subject matter into charts, graphs or presentations to be briefed to senior officers. Even the most junior employee member has been asked at least once
orally or presentation to brief a senior manager.
According to Nuruzzaman (2006) the majority of them do it as a matter of duty, given the number of inspections and command visits a unit receives. Seventh, An ability to manage time and to multitask; taking four to six classes a semester, doing assignments and exams, and keeping up with fraternity activities or sports teams. This means you have to be very relevant to where you require being on a given day and what you need to have achieved to be successful. Eighth; an ability to manage time and to multitask, also in handling the requirements of your job in the military forces, there is no shortage of administrative tasks, "no notice" tasking, and things that just go contrary to the way they were expected to contend with on a daily basis (Carment, Prest, & Samy, 2009). The officers go on a "no excuses" mentality, so service officers are expected to deal with the situation as it occurs, figure out how to adapt to and overcome road blocks and realize the objectives. Then, when you break it down that way, one can see how three to six years of military service gives much if not all as expressed by the employers themselves of a four-year degree.
Finally, on online degrees: while on duties in the military, many military officers undertake online learning, as this enables them to take classes and work toward a degree while on deployment or while handling several exercises and other work duties. So, check your personal bias against degrees from online colleges, as those educational options are often the only ones available for military officers
to pursue while still in duties. I believe it means a lot about a military effort to choose to take education in addition to all their other commitments while serving. Academic qualifications or practical experience alone will not suffice. The way in which academic programs are also taught needs to be remodeled, so academic teaching covers business as well as the traditional security context, however for this to be achieved the regulation of accreditation will also need to be improved to create a culture of continuous improvement (Hardy, 2001). The evidence examined would suggest that for a Security Manager to be able to enhance success, they must possess a mixture of key attributes.
Firstly, have adequate experience where they have gained the necessary practical skills, secondly, hold relevant academic qualifications which are audited by a regulatory body, and finally they must possess business acumen.
References
- Bowlby, J. (2005). A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory(Vol. 393). Taylor & Francis.
- Ayoob, M. (1995). The third world security predicament: State making, regional conflict, and the international system (p. 4). L.
Rienner Publishers.
- Blanchard, E. M. (2003). Gender, international relations, and the development of feminist security theory. Signs, 28(4), 1289-1312.
- Booth, K.
(1994). Security and Self reflections of a fallen realist.
- Gastil, R. D. (1990). The comparative survey of freedom: Experiences and suggestions. Studies in Comparative International Development, 25(1), 25-50.
- Stanley, L. (2013).
Feminist praxis and the academic mode of production.Feminist Praxis (RLE Feminist Theory): Research, Theory and Epistemology in Feminist Sociology, 3.
- Hardy, C. (2001). Researching organizational discourse. International studies of management & organizati Booth, K. (2007). Theory of world security (Vol. 105). Cambridge University Press.on, 31(3), 25-47.
- Devine, J.
(1996). Maximum security: The culture of violence in inner-city schools. University of
Chicago Press.
Nuclear learning and US–Soviet security regimes.International Organization, 41(03), 371-402.
W. (1999). Security, strategy, and critical theory. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
A. (1999). Contemporary security and strategy. In Contemporary security and strategy (pp. 1-12). Macmillan Education UK.
(2009). Security, development and the fragile state: Bridging the gap between theory and policy. Routledge.
- Academic Degree essays
- Academic Dishonesty essays
- Academic writing essays
- Cheating essays
- School Uniform essays
- Academia essays
- Academic And Career Goals essays
- Academic Integrity essays
- Brainstorming essays
- Brown V Board of Education essays
- Brown Vs Board Of Education essays
- Coursework essays
- Curriculum essays
- Distance learning essays
- Early Childhood Education essays
- Education System essays
- Educational Goals essays
- First Day of School essays
- Higher Education essays
- Importance Of College Education essays
- Importance of Education essays
- Language Learning essays
- Online Education Vs Traditional Education essays
- Pedagogy essays
- Philosophy of Education essays
- Purpose of Education essays
- Scholarship essays
- Study essays
- Studying Abroad essays
- Studying Business essays
- Technology in Education essays
- The Importance Of Higher Education essays
- Vocabulary essays
- Writing Experience essays