The issue of abortion has caused a rift among Americans, resulting in two distinct factions. However, the release of the movie Juno in December 2007 has presented a more nuanced viewpoint. Juno MacGuff, a sixteen-year-old girl known for her independence, takes center stage in this film as she navigates an unplanned pregnancy. Coming from a working-class family with parents who are unfamiliar with Pilates and have a love for kitschy objects.
"Juno and the Culture Wars" (pg. 396) by Ann Hulbert discusses how Juno goes through the ups and downs of pregnancy before ultimately choosing adoption over abortion.
"According to Hulbert, Juno has successfully appeased both sides of the family values debate," resulting in a satisfying outcome for the divided American society. On August 28th, 1996, Bill Clinton's speech at the Democratic National Convention also emphasized that "Abortion should not only be safe and
...legal, it should be rare." Similar to Juno's message, Clinton's statement has fostered an idea that uncovers shared principles amidst conflicting viewpoints. Currently, within this contentious feud between these two factions, the original goal of protecting women seems to have been overlooked."
There are two contrasting perspectives on abortion: pro-choice and pro-life. The pro-choice standpoint advocates for a woman's right to choose whether or not to have an abortion, while the pro-life viewpoint asserts that abortion is tantamount to taking a life.
In her speech, Clinton addresses three significant points that consider both sides of the argument. This is why I concur with her statement. I support the idea that abortions should be "safe" in order to safeguard women from potential harm. Additionally, I believe they should be "legal", granting women the freedom to make
their own decisions. Lastly, I endorse the notion that abortions should be "rare" so as to minimize fatalities linked to this procedure.
Clinton underscores the importance of prioritizing women's safety by utilizing the term "safe" when discussing abortions.
The ruling in the 1973 Roe v. Wade case emphasized the importance of safeguarding parental life and women's health, aligning with the interests of both state and government. Notwithstanding worries about abortion safety, a recent study showcased in Sora Song's article "Study Finds Abortion Safe" in Time Health Magazine, released on August 16 and referenced in the New England Journal of Medicine, affirms the continued safety of mifepristone, a contentious medical-abortion drug.
Song (year) argues that the introduction of mifepristone has offered a safer and less painful option for ending pregnancies. The author highlights the greater effectiveness of mifepristone compared to surgical abortions. Furthermore, researchers discovered no elevated risk of ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, premature birth, or low birth weight among women who opted for this medication rather than surgical methods.
The utilization of prescription medications such as mifepristone has offered safer alternatives for women facing abortion in contemporary America. Research indicates that criminalizing abortion results in increased rates of mortality and injuries among women worldwide. During the 1950s, when abortion was unlawful, many women were compelled to resort to hazardous techniques referred to as "Back-Alley Abortions," which posed significant risks to their health. As expressed by Nicole Coleston in Socialistworker.
In her article, org discusses the consequences of making safe medical procedures, such as abortion, illegal. She notes that when these procedures are banned by law, women often turn to dangerous and sometimes lethal back-alley abortions. Because these abortions were performed discreetly,
many providers lacked the necessary materials to safely administer them. This resulted in increased pain and even death for women. The lack of sanitation also led to infections, as providers did not always properly clean their materials. This was highlighted in Marie Johnstone's journal on beliefnet.
In the text, she provides a detailed description of her back alley abortion, specifically mentioning the presence of two chairs, a smaller table with a pitcher of water, a basin, paper cups, and a small stack of towels. She also mentions the room's faded wallpaper with rows of brownish designs resembling stalks of wheat. According to Ourbodiesourselves.org, the estimated number of illegal abortions in the United States during the 1950s and 1960s ranged from 200,000 to 1.
Two million individuals. It becomes apparent that "Back-Alley Abortions" pose a significant danger. The concept of illegal abortions like "Back-Alley Abortions" should alarm the American population, as history has a tendency to repeat itself. Despite the advancements in technology that allow us to produce prescription drugs capable of inducing abortion, the procedure remains perilous. This is precisely why abortion should be kept infrequent.
Preventing abortion is of utmost importance to avoid the pain and suffering it brings. Personally, I have seen firsthand the negative consequences of mifepristone, a drug that causes discomfort starting from the day following the procedure. Common symptoms include nausea, body soreness, and severe stomach pains. These unpleasant effects are directly caused by mifepristone alone, and no woman should have to go through such agony. Hence, it is crucial to support preventive measures aimed at reducing the number of abortions.
In our society, it is crucial to highlight the significance and efficacy of
condoms and birth control in reducing the occurrence of abortions. The time required for condom use or daily contraceptive pill intake pales in comparison to the suffering and anguish associated with undergoing an abortion. By utilizing these methods, we can prevent the necessity of abortions and prioritize the safety and well-being of women in America. As emphasized by Juno MacGuff and former President Bill Clinton, our aim is to safeguard lives while granting women empowerment through choices. Thanks to medical advancements, abortions can now be carried out using pills instead of risky surgical procedures, thereby ensuring women's safety.
Ensuring women's safety and preventing unsafe abortions is essential. The goal should be to prevent such situations from recurring. To reduce the need for abortions, prevention methods like using condoms and birth control are vital. Americans must fully utilize these methods to decrease the number of abortions. During the abortion debate, Clinton's speech pleased both pro-life and pro-choice supporters by emphasizing the importance of prioritizing women's safety over taking a stance.
- Pro Choice essays
- Pro Life essays
- Should Abortion Be Legal essays
- Against abortion essays
- Abortion Debate essays
- Anatomy and Physiology essays
- Addiction essays
- Biodegradation essays
- Dental Care essays
- Disease essays
- Disorders essays
- Health Care essays
- Intelligence Quotient essays
- Nutrition essays
- Olfaction essays
- Public Health essays
- Women's Health essays
- World health organization essays
- Cancer essays
- Infectious Disease essays
- Lung Cancer essays
- Neurology essays
- Physical Exercise essays
- Medicine essays
- Sex essays
- Inquiry essays
- Disability essays
- Poison essays
- Action Potential essays
- Nervous System essays
- Childbirth essays
- Puberty essays
- Blood essays
- Kidney essays
- Neuron essays
- Body essays
- Glucose essays
- Sense essays
- Heart essays
- Skeleton essays
- Human Physiology essays
- Eye essays
- Immune System essays
- Muscle essays
- Skin essays
- Brain essays
- Central Nervous System essays
- Human Skin Color essays
- Digestive System essays
- Common sense essays