Whch organization i would love to work with Essay Example

workforce's abilities, as demonstrated by the aforementioned analysis. This empowers employees within the company to fully exploit their talents and succeed in their professional endeavors. These elements, among others mentioned earlier, generate my enthusiasm for joining Microsoft. Additionally, being employed by Microsoft would provide job stability as the company values employee development and does not readily terminate staff without proper justifications.

Compared to other organizations, Microsoft has a strong focus on protecting its employees and promoting their long-term career development. It has a solid program in place to support employees in reaching their full potential. In today's world, human resources are recognized as the most valuable asset for organizations as they enable the implementation of other resources. According to de Silva (1998), the mindset that considers people as a variable cost has been replaced with the understanding that they are a resource and can contribute to competitive advantage. Therefore, working for Microsoft means being part of a human resource management approach that values employees as a significant tool for success. Microsoft also encourages workers to share innovative ideas and provides a rewarding environment that pays great attention to such contributions. Furthermore, Microsoft's reward system and compensation package are highly competitive within the industry. The organization's attractiveness among the three case studies is another factor that catches my interest.

Compensating staff appropriately is crucial in motivating them to work harder and perform at their best. While the Human Relation School argues that it is not always the primary motivator, informal relationships in the workplace do play a role. Nevertheless, monetary incentives and attractive fringe benefits are still important factors in staff motivation. In the case of IBM,

the organization has implemented a well-structured HR policy to ensure workforce stability. While this benefits the organization, individual workers would benefit more if the organization focused on their capacity building and future development. Dell Incorporation places emphasis on training its workforce to maintain the organizational culture and provide customer satisfaction, in line with its strategic plans. On an individual level, workers desire capacity building through training and development, as well as adequate compensation, leading them to stay in the organization and nurture their career growth. This is exactly what Microsoft offers.

Conclusion Ad Recommendation

Organization operates not in a vacuum; there exist interaction among the members within the organization and those other organizations that carry out business transactions with the organization in question. Thus, the organizational structure determines how interactions within an organization take place. The types of command structure also goes a long way in determine the way decisions flow in the organization and how each staff interaction with his or her fellow workers. Thus, effective organizational structure the organization’s objectives are easily attained with less difficulty. A complex and unorganized organizational structure and leadership style tend to be dysfunctional to the progressive growth of the organization.

The human resources department is essential for the successful growth of an organization as it utilizes the organization's resources to achieve its objectives. Organizational structure and leadership patterns vary, with information flowing either from bottom to top or top to bottom. Additionally, there is a horizontal flow of information between departments and a diagonal flow between staff levels within the organization.

This write-up covers various leadership styles including Autocratic, Democratic, free reign, and Situational leadership styles. It also analyzes case studies

of IBM, Microsoft, and Dell Incorporation in the computer manufacturing and software industry. Each company has its unique strategy for competing in the industrial environment. Dell Incorporation specializes in providing cost-effective products tailored to customer needs through direct selling. IBM focuses on maintaining product standards to gain customer trust. Microsoft employs an innovative approach to develop new products and anticipate future customer needs. These distinct strategic frameworks have enabled each organization to establish their own niche within the industry.

It is recommended that organizations maintain their different corporate cultures and organizational strategies. However, it is sufficient to say here that Dell incorporation and IBM need to incorporate more innovative strategies and invest in worker capacity building in order to compete favorably with Microsoft organization.

References

1. Brown, S. L.; Eisenhardt, K. M. (1998), Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press. Dell official websites (2006)