The Schlieffen Plan Argumentative Essay Example
The Schlieffen Plan Argumentative Essay Example

The Schlieffen Plan Argumentative Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 3 (565 words)
  • Published: November 9, 2017
  • Type: Research Paper
View Entire Sample
Text preview

In some ways, Source C supports Sources A and B and in some ways they don't. When looking at Sources C and A, there are many different points about the Battle of Mons.

Both sources mention that there were many people in the German Army attacking the British. "Waves of German infantry. " This quote from source A supports that the German had many in numbers. "German attacks. " This quote from Source C supports that there was many German fighting the British. The Germans had one of the largest armies in the world that time.

The British army called the BEF (British Expeditionary Force) had fewer men.The British army was well trained and very professional. In the German army, the men had to join the army as there wasn't a choice but the BEF had men

...

who were in the army as it was their job. Another point that both the sources mention is that the British had few soldiers compared to the Germans.

"British were too few in numbers. " This quote from Source A supports that. "Finding themselves alone. " This quote from Source C says that the British were soon dying out as they had only few men left. Both sources also mention that the British were in danger.

"In danger" Source A. "In Danger" Source C. They were in danger as they were few in numbers and as they were attacking the German kept on coming. All these points from Source C are supported by Source A However in source C it mentions the role of the French and how they were negative points. Source A does not talk about the French. Source A

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

says that the German had bad and outdated tactics.

The tactics that the German army used was the tactics that General Schlieffen wrote in 1905 in his plan. Source C blames the French that they left the British to do the work in the Battle of Mons. Source C has many negative points about the French. Source A does not mention anything about the French.

Comparing Sources B and C, one is from a soldier who was actually there and the other was from a historian's view. Both sources tell us that there was lots of Germans. "Came in their hordes," this quote from Source B supports this. "French were withdrawing," This quote from Source C shows us that there were many Germans and the French were scared as they had fewer men in their army.

The BEF were under pressure from the Germans. "Enough of them to shove us out of the field," This quote is from Source B it supports that the BEF were under pressure. Under pressure from the German attacks," this quote is from Source C and it also supports what is said in Source B by this point. Source B is an account of a British Soldiers experience in the Battle of Mons.

It is very detailed. It is important to remember that this soldier was actually there fighting. Source C is a historian's point of view. The historian wasn't involved in the war; he was interested and wrote an account using different references. Source B doesn't mention the France.

The British Soldier maybe didn't see the French that point in the war. So he couldn't say anything about them. Source C does mention about

the French.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New