The Bush Doctrine After the 9/11 Essay Example

that America should directly confront these enemies, significantly shaping the Bush Doctrine. Following 9/11, Bush emphasized the need for America to take initiative, emphasizing the concept of preemption. This has become the main strategy for the American administration, involving launching an attack to prevent an imminent threat or disrupt an adversary. While preemption forces the attacking party to strike, preventive war provides the aggressor with a choice on whether or not to launch an assault based on different motivations.

The video uncovers America's utilization of warfare as a preemptive measure, manipulating the susceptibility of its populace through dissemination of falsehoods to justify their actions. This ultimately favors a privileged minority who reap profits from these conflicts. The documentary specifically scrutinizes the Iraq war and how the Bush administration capitalized on the September 9/11 attack to sway Americans into believing that AL Qaeda was culpable, furthering their own agenda. However, evidence presented in the film suggests that this assertion might have been a government-manipulated deception. It exposes that America wages wars to serve corporate interests, with officials directly benefiting from these conflicts by supplying military materials. In addition, the film delves into investigating the impact of the cold war on America.

The video discusses how America's backing of Saddam Hussein in the Iraq-Iran conflict resulted in the war on Iraq. They supplied weapons and guidance, fostering a cordial bond. Nevertheless, when Hussein invaded Kuwait, America grew concerned about their partnership with him. As a result, they labeled him as an adversary and began considering strategies to strike against him.

The text examines America's role in the Cold War in the Middle East, particularly through its backing of Hussein during

the Iraq-Iran conflict. This support was motivated by American interests, including securing oil from the area. It is significant that a previous ally of America ultimately turned into its most formidable adversary, demonstrating how America frequently fights to gain authority over valuable resources such as oil. The video also emphasizes the president's dual responsibilities as both a crisis manager and commander in chief. President Bush is depicted making choices after the 9/11 attacks and choosing to pursue his own strategy of engaging in war in Iraq.

The president's role in a nation is symbolic, and their actions shape the country. The movie also emphasizes the importance of the media, especially regarding terrorist attacks. In the film, we observe public discontent with how 9/11 was portrayed.

The media should have considered the emotions of the affected families, as well as their responsibility to inform and be mindful when reporting sensitive matters. Furthermore, the film demonstrates how easily the public can be swayed into supporting governmental actions without critical thinking or accountability. Instead, individuals must analyze and question decisions made by those in power to fight against corruption.

The video underscores the significance of Congress in examining and scrutinizing presidential decisions. Nevertheless, it is evident that they do not completely fulfill these expectations since they also gain advantages from such acts of aggression. The present paper concurs with this perspective and emphasizes that actions taken by administrators and leaders in American society primarily serve the interests of a privileged few individuals who hold power. The repercussions of these actions, exemplified by the war in Iraq, have predominantly led to adverse outcomes. These encompass loss of innocent lives, as portrayed in

the video, along with substantial financial investments and casualties among both male and female participants in these conflicts.

Countless companies benefit financially from receiving millions of dollars for rendering military services, as they seek extended conflict to maximize their gains. It is crucial that we remain watchful in scrutinizing the choices made by our leaders and resist being easily misled. Such vigilance will enable us to carefully examine every decision made by those in positions of authority.