Virginia And New Jersey Flashcards, test questions and answers

Discover flashcards, test exam answers, and assignments to help you learn more about Virginia And New Jersey and other subjects. Don’t miss the chance to use them for more effective college education. Use our database of questions and answers on Virginia And New Jersey and get quick solutions for your test.

What is Virginia And New Jersey?

The Virginia and New Jersey Plans were two alternative plans for the reorganization of the United States government during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. These plans were influential in shaping the Constitution, and ultimately became a major part of its framework. The debate between these two plans was one of the most contentious issues at the Convention, as both sides argued passionately for their respective positions. In this essay, we will explore both plans in detail and examine why they were so important to the formation of America’s current government.The Virginia Plan was proposed by James Madison and Edmund Randolph from Virginia. It proposed creating a strong national government with three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. Each branch would be comprised of representatives elected directly by citizens and chosen based on population size; larger states would have more representatives than smaller states. This plan favored larger states over smaller ones because it gave them more representation in Congress, which had been a major issue during earlier discussions about forming a union between states. Additionally, it proposed that all laws should be agreed upon by both houses of Congress before they could be passed into law. The New Jersey Plan was proposed by William Paterson from New Jersey as an alternative to the Virginia Plan. It called for a single-chamber legislature where each state would receive equal representation regardless of population size; this arrangement favored smaller states over larger ones since each state would have an equal voice in determining policy outcomes. Additionally, it suggested that no law could be passed without approval from nine out of thirteen state representatives, instead of requiring agreement from both houses like under Madison’s plan. Ultimately, neither plan was adopted as written but rather elements from both were combined to form what eventually became known as the Great Compromisea combination legislation chamber with proportional representation (as seen in Madison’s plan) alongside an upper chamber with equal representation (as seen in Paterson’s plan). This compromise was crucial to achieving consensus among delegates at the Convention and allowed them to move forward with drafting other parts of America’s new constitution without further disagreements on this issue holding up progressmaking it one of its most pivotal moments in history.