Staples Case Study Essay Example

a successful implementation?Staples chose to offer a low priced product and did not engage in much product differentiation and no market segmentation. To make this a reality they had to decide where to locate, size of population needed to support the store, selection of merchandise. They also needed to find a way to educate the customer. Some of the factors for a successful implementation included: ·Cutting costs / efficient management ·Direct delivery to store ·Minimize inventory in order to reduce working capital ·Rapid Rollout to stay ahead of competition.

5.Upon its launch Staples faced a few problems from both a managerial and organizational aspect. First, it was difficult for Staples to locate prime real estate at an affordable price in the markets it desired. It was their business focus to open large superstores in large markets such as Boston, New York City, Philadelphia, etc; they would however find out that those areas were very expensive to rent.

Staples had decided to, against the will of a few of the venture capitalists, to open a distribution center in Connecticut to support its stores.This allowed them to open smaller stores and supply store inventory for its distribution center. This saved on rent and also labor. Another challenge the company faced was establishing funds to open its first stores. Stemberg had marketed his business idea to various venture capitalists however they were valuing his company at $6M and thus wanted a 67% stake in the company for a $4M investment. He was able to persuade Bain Investment Group in the offset and the others followed.

He was able to compromise and the VC’s received a 54% stake in

the company. 6.Although the competition became fierce within a few years of startup, Staples was able to emerge as the industry leader. One innovative idea that allowed them to do this was its information systems. Staples was able to attach a SKU to each of its items in order to track inventory. This system also allowed them to track its profit margin on each item, not just an average across multiple items as its competitors were doing.

They were able to turn inventory over 12 times a year thus basically allowing their suppliers to fund their inventory, as they were able to pay within 30 days.