Significant Patterns of Evidence in Works of John Locke and Isaac Newton Essay Example

be realized, ultimately challenging and reshaping many philosophical concepts.

Newton's motivation was to challenge Aristotle and other philosophers, and to develop a fresh perspective on the world using new approaches and models (Le Grand 59). He was particularly interested in and concerned with the Cartesian viewpoint, and sought to assess the foundations and models that could be derived from those principles. Rather than focusing solely on past works, he concentrated on more contemporary models to gain a deeper understanding of different aspects of the model. Newton later proposed that experimental philosophy was the primary model and aspect that could be used to develop the underlying philosophical concepts in society. This approach enhanced various traits and provided a working principle to better grasp the world. The tools established differed from those previously used, and the characteristics of society indicated how this new ideology and model could be applied accordingly.

The text discusses how Locke examined various aspects of empiricism and its impact on society. Empiricism, which focused on understanding and improving societal structures, was based on experimentation and the development of new methods and assessments. Locke, who was English, compared his ideas with those of other philosophers who believed that individuals possessed the ability to address and improve their innate skills. One important aspect of empiricism is the concept of ideas and their relation to the larger goals and models of society.

Locke asserts that ideas play a vital role in driving societal change by offering essential information. He contends that ideas are pivotal for the progress of rational thinking, as they are grounded in an individual's perception of reality. Additionally, Locke maintains that ideas must be validated to

be valuable and impactful when making decisions within society, thus giving rise to empiricism. Similarly, Newton's methodology for comprehending the world and constructing a practical framework harmonizes with the evaluation and cultivation of ideas (Sinclair 433).

According to Locke, the assessment aligned with his belief that ideas and concepts required experimentation in order to understand their functional aspects in society. He criticized nativism, which argued that some ideas are innate and certain individuals are born with a greater wealth of ideas. Locke disagreed with this idea, as he believed that ideas are acquired through interaction with society. He used examples from various communities to support his argument, noting that each individual had different opinions and ideas about different aspects of society (Anstay 95).

The way in which someone was brought up and the environment they were exposed to shaped their perception of the world and the ideas they formed. These ideas were influenced by experiences and sensations derived from various aspects of society, and played a crucial role in assimilating new concepts and information within society. Locke criticized the notion of nativism and failed to grasp the full comprehension of the concepts and models presented in society, as there were discrepancies in the tools and methods employed to cultivate desirable traits and attributes. Isaac Newton likewise emphasizes the importance of understanding the fundamental principles and rationale behind various phenomena as a means of attaining knowledge in a world filled with numerous complexities.

Newton emphasized the significance of experimentation as the primary means of acquiring knowledge in society (Sinclair 504). It is not inherent for individuals to possess an innate understanding or ability to generate new ideas, as they

are shaped by both their environment and crucial concepts necessitated by society. Locke further asserted that ideas are acquired rather than being innate, forming the foundation of empiricism. Recognizing societal changes, Locke stressed the need for acquiring and cultivating ideas from novel forms of knowledge in order to advance new methods and ideas (Anstay 155).

According to Locke, individuals should actively seek and develop new ideas through their experiences and interactions in society. He believed that gaining knowledge was dependent on acquiring ideas, which allowed for a fresh perspective by incorporating past aspects and systems. Locke valued new ideas, languages, and societal aspects as they offered opportunities to explore innovative concepts and models. His philosophy aligned with Isaac Newton's, both emphasizing the importance of developing new ideas and experimenting to enhance understanding within society. Each person must independently cultivate their own understanding and learn through their own methods to contribute valuable attributes and qualities to society (Anstay 86).

Every individual in society has the opportunity to pursue a noble purpose and establish the necessary foundation and methods for fostering desirable traits. The principles of empiricism, exemplified in Isaac Newton's approach to experimentation, were advocated by both Newton himself and other British intellectuals during that era. Through analyzing and imaginatively examining various facets of societal transformation, these philosophers influenced the dominant philosophical notions of their time. It was crucial for people to understand that their abilities and understanding of the world were not inherent but rather acquired through the evolution of ideas and concepts within society.

The social concepts that were developed played a critical role in allowing individuals to create effective processes and models. These concepts were carefully

developed and established through societal structures, aiming to understand important aspects of society (Russell 99). Each member contributed their ideas and concepts, providing the people with essential understanding. Additionally, other philosophers in the 18th and 19th century furthered this understanding by emphasizing the importance of experimentation and empirical evidence, leading to the formation of empiricism or empiricist philosophy.

The two philosophers shared similar ideas, which they further developed and expanded by establishing a structured and comprehensive system. Both philosophers emphasized the value of experimentation and gaining knowledge through interaction and testing of new concepts. A crucial aspect for both philosophers was the necessity of generating new ideas and the significance of empirical evidence in determining what was true and what was not (Williamson 220). Consequently, it was imperative to establish a functional framework and system where individuals comprehended their environment and actively sought to formulate innovative ideas and theories.

Overall, the impact of these two philosophers on contemporary philosophy cannot be underestimated. Their ideas and theories have effectively shaped and influenced the development of new concepts and ideas within society. Both philosophers emerged after the passing of Aristotle, and their philosophies emphasized the significance of acquiring new knowledge and ideas rather than relying solely on innate knowledge. This concept proved crucial in understanding various actions and elements within societal structures, ultimately leading to the formation of a new world within society.

Works Cited

• Anstey, Peter R. John Locke and natural philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2011.
• Le Grand, Homer Eugene, ed. Experimental inquiries: historical, philosophical and social studies of experimentation in science. Vol. 8. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
• Newton, Isaac. Newton: philosophical writings. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
• Russell, Bertrand. Philosophy and politics. Cambridge University Press,
  

2016.