Same Sex Marriage Analysis Essay Example
Same Sex Marriage Analysis Essay Example

Same Sex Marriage Analysis Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 4 (840 words)
  • Published: September 22, 2017
  • Type: Essay
View Entire Sample
Text preview

The global impact of gay marriage has led to varied opinions from people of different sexual orientations and ages. The main topic of discussion is Proposition 8, a California ballot and state constitutional amendment implemented in the November 2008 state election. This amendment, officially named "Eliminates Rights of Same-Sex Couples to Marry Initiative Constitutional Amendment," restricted marriage to heterosexual couples only, legally prohibiting same-sex couples from marrying. However, in 2010, a federal court declared this restriction unconstitutional, though confirmation was not received until July. Since 2008, many court cases have been fought with the goal of legalizing gay marriage, ultimately resulting in victory.

It is unjust to prevent individuals from freely entering into committed relationships solely based on public opinion that does not harm others. Our countr

...

y prides itself on being the land of the free; however, government control limits personal choices that cause no harm to others. Such inequality is unfair.

In America, there exists an odd inconsistency regarding judgment and freedom. While individuals can face judgment and be granted freedom after committing serious crimes like murder, they are not allowed to enter into same-sex unions.

This lack of coherence can be quite perplexing. Love is an uncontrollable force, and individuals cannot determine who they are attracted to or fall in love with. As a Christian, I understand the opposing viewpoint that homosexuality is considered sinful according to the Bible and that marriage should only be between a man and a woman. However, societal changes have led me to form a personal opinion that differs from my religious beliefs. I believe that love between same-sex couples can be just as genuine as that o

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

opposite-sex couples. If these couples choose to marry, it has no impact on my life or well-being.

It is essential to acknowledge that heterosexual couples often enter into marriages for wrong reasons and undermine the institution without remorse. In contrast, when same-sex couples desire marriage solely out of their love for one another, it is viewed as mocking the institution. This misplaced focus on trivial matters is prevalent in America and contradicts the supposed separation of church and state. We should not judge one another; there exists a higher power who will ultimately pass judgment on individuals' choices.

As American citizens, we possess the ability to make our own decisions regarding this matter. In February 2011, President Obama displayed strong support for marriage equality by having the Justice Department endorse its constitutional reasoning.Both President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder declared the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional, emphasizing the need for legal examination of discrimination against homosexuals. The administration's decision to stop defending the act in court received both praise and criticism, highlighting President Obama's bold support for gay marriage. As the first president to advocate for equal rights regardless of sexual orientation, this courageous step resonated with homosexuals worldwide. Furthermore, being the first African American president, President Obama recognized and acknowledged the history of discrimination against black people in America. He understood that past and present discrimination is unjust.

In a recent interview with Esquire magazine, beloved celebrity couple Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie revealed their decision not to marry despite an 8-year relationship and 6 children together. Brad Pitt stated that they would only consider marriage when it becomes legally accessible to all individuals who desire

it. This admirable choice demonstrates their commitment to waiting until same-sex couples have equal rights before tying the knot.Public opinion on same-sex marriage appears to be more accepting than before. However, research suggests that polls may slightly overestimate support for same-sex marriage compared to actual election results. According to Silver (2013), this could indicate social pressure for voters to publicly support same-sex marriage, even if they have personal reservations about it. This tendency to conform is also observed in personal experiences.

Some people propose using "civil unions" instead of "marriage" as an alternative approach to gay marriage ("A Gay Marriage Solution: End Marriage"). But disregarding the significance of the word "marriage" could diminish its meaning. The term "marriage" symbolizes deep commitment, love, exchange of vows in front of God and loved ones, and unwavering dedication through thick and thin. In contrast, "civil union" implies a temporary and limited relationship.

So why would someone proudly declare their situation? Marriage is a proud announcement celebrated through weddings and parties, despite its potential for divorce. It should not be equated with civil unions as they are incompatible.

In June/July 1776, Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence asserted that all men are equal and have certain unalienable rights including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. If the government restricts the happiness of same-sex couples, it goes against their right to be protected under the Declaration.The text does not exclude homosexuals and highlights the right of people to change or replace a government if it becomes harmful to these principles. Consequently, individuals worldwide, whether they are in same-sex relationships or heterosexual, are striving for legal reforms that align with the pursuit of happiness

mentioned by the 56 signatories of the Declaration of Independence in 1776.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New