Robert’s Rules of Order Essay Example

the issue by the Chairman.

In this case, the presentation of the motion or resolution is followed by the Chair’s request for comments and questions.The vote begins when no person requests the right to share one’s views after the Chair’s request. The motion can be modified before the Chair has announced it. These modifications come at the proposal of the members of the assembly. The mover also has the right to modify the motion even in case the seconder does not consent to the modification.

There are also ways to influence the decision made such as the “amendment” and the “motion to postpone”. Immediately before the vote, the chair asks the "immediately pending question".The participant of the assembly who moves this question has a preferential right to speak at this point of the process. The turns to the floor are also set in a predetermined way. In fact, no person should be speaking a second time before everyone has had to speak for the first time.

When the members of the assembly are talking, their comments and suggestions should be directed toward the chair, not the fellow participants. Robert’s Rules of Order also state explicitly the agenda is merely a tentative outline for the meeting. In fact, each person should have the right to modify agenda or make other alterations if deemed fit.The book has guidelines for a variety of specific occasions.

These guidelines are embodied in specific rules that have distinct names: “Point of Privilege”, “Parliamentary Inquiry”, “Point of Motion”, etc. These rules serve to sort out situations when conflict can potentially arise and come up with adequate solutions. Overall, Robert’s Rules of Order

is a highly effective framework for organized meetings. Initially intended as a set of guidelines for the Parliament’s procedures, it can be adopted at virtually any organization.

This is why a number of groups make use of these rules to make their meetings democratic and more effective.