Negative Aspects Of Coming Out Sociology Essay Essay

Flashcard maker : Lily Taylor

The procedure of stating others about your gender. Coming out is non needfully a one-off event – tribades, cheery work forces and bisexual people may hold to come out many times during their lives.

The grounds suggests that the coming-out procedure has been researched from a assortment of positions ( see Plummer, 2010 ; Coleman 1982 ; and Sherriff & A ; Pope, 2008 ) . Psychological attacks have detailed the effects on the development of ego, sometimes underscoring the jobs ( DCSF, 2007 ; Cull et Al, 2006 ; Hunt and Jenson, 2007 ; and Hunter, 1990 ) ; whereas others ( Miller, 1979 ; Ben-Ari, 1995 ; Mcdonald, 1982 ; Galatzer-Levy et Al 2002 ) suggest the positives that can emerge from this ‘process ‘ . This short literature reappraisal will discourse both positive and negative factors in more item. It will so discourse coming-out from a societal constructionist position.

Negative facets of coming-out

Research suggests that sapphic / homosexual / bisexual / transgender and diffident immature people frequently experience homophobic / transphobic intimidation, favoritism and marginalization because of their perceived individuality ( DCSF, 2007 ; Makadon et Al 2008 ; Robinson et Al, 2002 ; and Anthanases & A ; Larrabee, 2003 ) . A big portion of the job lies in our heterosexist and homophobic society ( Dreyer, 2007 ; Robinson, Irwin, & A ; Rerfolja, 2002 ) and the ensuing stigmatised ecology it creates. This can so be internalised by vulnerable sapphic, homosexual, bisexual, transgender and / or diffident immature people. Weeks ( 2011 ) supports this position, indicating out that much public, political and educational policy has a heterosexist structure/framework. The negative consequence of this heterosexist construction can hold a important impact on an person ‘s mental wellness and wellbeing ( DCSF, 2007 ; Johnson et Al 2007 ; Breitenbach, 2004 ) , and the effects of this can take to societal isolation and exclusion ( DCSF, 2007 ) ; homelessness ( Cull et al, 2006 ) ; strong-arming ( Hunt and Jenson, 2007 ) ; and force and maltreatment from household and equals ( Hunter, 1990 ) .

Cull et Al ( 2006 ) and Roger ( 1994 ) recognize the force per unit area exerted on these communities to conform to the heterosexist and homophobic society, via plentiful signals and guideposts, as to how to act, what is expected, what is ‘normal ‘ , ‘natural ‘ , ‘right ‘ and ‘healthy ‘ , which produces an invitation to fall in ; and an invitation into the universe of sex and sexual individuality for all kids and immature people. For those for whom this invitation provides undisputed entree to this universe, it follows that this signals the possibility of increasing assurance, power, and credence ( Sherriff & A ; Pope, 2008 ) .

However, for those who do non ‘fit ‘ this theoretical account, the latter advantages are replaced by their obverse: worsening societal assurance and power ( Cato & A ; Canetto, 2003 ) ; and for some sapphic, homosexual, bisexual, transgender and / or diffident immature people, inclusion and soaking up are replaced by exclusion and rejection ( DAugelli et al, 2002 ) . These factors mean that their sexual individuality is likely to be experienced as a ‘crisis ‘ , an ’emergency ‘ , a menace to safety, self-esteem, assurance, well-being ( Mufioz-Plaza et Al, 2002 ) . This leads to an eroding of societal power and credence, instead than an enlargement of a sense of ego, and hence sense of bureau ; greater uncertainness ; and the possibility of confusion, even fear ( GLSEN, 2003 ; Anthanases & A ; Larrabee, 2003 ; McDaniel, 2001 ) .

Positive facets of coming-out

There is, nevertheless, much research ( Miller, 1979 ) that suggests many positive facets of coming-out, including a development of a greater sense of ego, and a stronger physical, psychological and/or emotional wellness and wellbeing.

In the earlier phase development theoretical accounts of individuality development, such as Cass ( 1979 ) , Coleman ( 1982 ) and Troiden ( 1989:56 ) , it is noted that ‘coming-out ‘ “ denotes the accomplishment of a higher degree of development ” .

Sociologists have nevertheless critiqued these attacks for being excessively additive and for non believing about how contexts and civilizations may be impacting what happens and how. For illustration Weeks ( 2011 ) suggests that there are many built-in issues with the aforesaid theoretical accounts of individuality development, due to their one-dimensionality, gross generalization and descriptive constructions.

Sociologists, peculiarly from a societal constructionist attack frequently argued that the ‘coming-out procedure ‘ is non a generalizable, changeless and absolute phase of development, but a fluid, switching ‘process ‘ , altering over clip, due to ( un ) related political, societal emotional and psychological factors, forces and powers ( Weeks 2011 ) .

Ward and Winstanley ( 2005 ) acknowledge and support Miller ‘s ( 1979 ) claims, proposing that tribades and gay work forces travel through a ‘renegotiation ‘ of their single individuality, one time the initial ‘coming-out ‘ has started. This initial coming-out phase is still problematic, as more recent research ( Weeks, 2011 ; Casey, 2002 and Richardson, 2000 ) recognises this as a ‘process ‘ , non a phase. It could be argued: make all tribades and cheery work forces pass through the same phases during ‘coming-out ‘ to make the concluding terminal point? Or can we see a more fluid, interchangeable procedure to the ‘coming out ‘ procedure?

Cox and Gallious ( 1996:75 ) societal individuality position is successful in “ recognizing the fluctuation in the ‘coming-out procedures ” as it addresses the strong built-in societal forces that impact on and within society. This position pays attending to analyzing the “ single procedures ” , therefore leting for “ greater intra-group assortment ” ( Cox and Gallious, 1996:75 ) . It besides explores the effects society has on the procedures, and in contrast, how these procedures affect the broader social constructions. This position allows for the inclusion of an person ‘s multiple individualities such as race, gender, societal category and ethnicity and how they may interact with each other and the person ‘s sexual individuality. These multiple individualities and worlds help to knit together an individuality narration, whether this is public or private ( Weeks, 2011 ) .

Ward and Winstanley ( 2005 ) support Cox and Gallious ( 1996 ) , Gergen ( 1985 ) and Plummer ‘s ( 1975 ) old reviews by discoursing the mutableness component of sexual individuality. They besides note that the ‘coming-out procedure ‘ is fraught with ethical, moralistic, societal and political intensions as antecedently discussed by ( Weeks 2011 ) .

Ben-Ari ( 1995 ) argues that the coming-out ‘process ‘ is imperative to turn to, challenge, onslaught and get the better of our ain internalised premises, including the culturally comparative and socially constructed impressions of homophobia and heterosexism. Although these constructs and patterns appear fixed in our civilization ( Weeks, 2011 ) , disputing them helps weaken their ‘social position ‘ as natural, inevitable and changeless.

This survey will therefore analyze the coming-out procedures and see a ) what are the modern-day kineticss within a peculiar location ( the North E ) and B ) besides examine the positions of those around the individual coming-out.

This survey is a direct response to the perceived problematic: the deficiency of empirical geographic expedition into these critical, intuitive and multidimensional penetrations and experiences.

In position of the above, I have formulated the undermentioned research inquiry:

To research and analyze the experiences of persons, compared to that of their households, communities, and/or society, during the initial coming-out ‘process ‘ , supplying an chance for all to reflect on any troubles and/or alterations, obstructions and/or discoveries.

Purposes

The intent of my PhD research is to:

aˆ? Explore the experiences of cheery work forces and their friends, households, communities and/or co-workers during the coming-out ‘process ‘ .

aˆ? Provide an chance for contemplation, paying attending to how these experiences both positive and negative are understood and managed

aˆ? Provide the participants with the chance for them to happen their voices / talk their experience / to portion and critically reflect on that experience.

Aims

This will be done by:

aˆ? Using a varied age group ( 16 – 30 ) young person as defined by Casey ( 2002 ) , ethnicity, manner, and ‘individual differences ‘ of homosexuals work forces.

aˆ? Including the ideas, feelings and emotions from persons ‘ households, communities, and/or social influences with relation to the single coming-out ‘process ‘ .

aˆ? Using midst rich qualitative informations from the focal point groups and/or semi-structured interviews, which contain the experiences of non merely the person, but their households, societies and/or communities.

aˆ? Analyzing the narrations, and picking out subjects that show forms of ideas, feelings, emotions, and behaviours related to the experiences throughout and within the coming-out procedure.

Epistemic premises

With respects to my epistemic premises, I would take on board the constructivist paradigm within my PhD research. Constructivism investigates how human existences generate systems that allow them to understand their experiences within the universe. It besides suggests that ‘facts ‘ are a ‘construct of theories and points of position ‘ ( Lincoln & A ; Guba, 2005 ) . Hollway & A ; Jefferson ( 2000 ) suggest that relativism consists of assorted theories, each of which makes claim that ‘some component and / or facet of experience and / or civilization is comparative to or dependent on, some other component and / or facet ‘ , leting for subjectiveness. This paradigm holds that both the nature of truth and the enquiry into that truth are debatable. This is because truth is constructed from the ‘ongoing procedures of dialogue, re-evaluation and polish of, and between, persons ‘ ( Raskin, 2002 ) .

Methodological considerations

All research methods and methodological premises will be based around the qualitative paradigm.

Denzin & A ; Lincoln ( 1998 ) cited in Smith ( 2003:16 ) province that:

Qualitative research workers study things in their natural scenes, trying to do sense of, or construe, phenomena in footings of the significances people bring to them. It involves the studied usage and aggregation of a assortment of empirical stuffs that describe everyday and debatable minutes and significances in persons ‘ lives.

Whereas Strauss & A ; Corbin ( 1990:17 ) describe qualitative research as

any sort of research that produces findings non arrived at by agencies of statistical processs or other agencies of quantification ” .

The intent of this qualitative survey is to derive a ‘multidimensional apprehension ‘ of the coming-out ‘process ‘ , and to bring out what lies behind the phenomenon, from a assortment of positions. Therefore, the focal point would be on deriving dense, accurate descriptions / individualized histories, and so exploring subjectiveness. Due to these factors, the participant ‘s position would be paramount, making an reliable component.

As semi-structured interviews and focal point groups will be used, the research will be carried out from an Interpretivist attack. Interpretivist attacks tend to favor qualitative methods of research, such as structured and semi-structured interviews ( Smith, 2003 ) . This allows for a more comprehensive apprehension of an person ‘s worldview. This type of Idiographic attack has little ( if any ) “ accent on the preparation of generic cosmopolitan Torahs ” , and tends to pay attending to the person, concentrating on the apprehension of single behavior ( Cohen et Al, 2001:22 ) .

Methods

McMillen & A ; Schumacher ( 1989:410 ) support my understanding, urging focal point groups as a “ potentially good method ” . McMillen & A ; Schumacher ( 1989:419 ) besides indicate out that focal point groups are a agencies to “ easing a societal environment in which single members are stimulated by the perceptual experiences, sentiments and thoughts ” of each other, which, in bend, increase the profusion of informations. Swanson & A ; Holton ( 1997: 98 ) recognise that focal point groups allow research workers to “ capitalize on group interaction around a subject ”

Semi-structured interviews will so be used to spread out on the coming-out processes, experiences, and positions brought to visible radiation within the focal point groups. This type of interview allows the research worker to inquire unfastened and/or closed inquiries. An illustration of an unfastened inquiry would be, “ state me aboutaˆ¦.. ” or “ discourse the manner that makes you experience ” . An illustration of a closed inquiry is “ are you happy with that, yes or no? ” Open inquiries are most good, as they allow the interviewer to acquire into the significance of what is being said, known as the Hermeneutics ( Banister, 1994 ) . They besides focus on actions, experiences, significances and / or grounds.

For the intent of these semi-structured interviews, largely open-ended inquiries will be used ; as the purpose of the research is to research the experiences, a treatment would be needed. This means that by and large no dichotomous inquiries would be asked: avoiding yes/no replies that make the informations more generalisable, and so less exploratory.

When warranting this method, it is of import to discourse the advantages of semi-structured interviews. They are flexible, giving the research worker freedom to present alternate subjects and/or subjects. I would be able to convey the interview back on path, if the participant starts to stray, spread out if they become excessively occupied and/or discreetly move on if clip became an issue. Smith ( 2000 ) recognises that semi-structured interviews are high in cogency, as participants are able to take part in in-depth, elaborate treatments, about existent life state of affairss.

On the other manus, I am cognizant this technique is time-consuming, and that the interviewer and interviewee ‘s interactions may act upon the information ( Bell 1999 ) . The profusion of the informations collected is besides dependent on the accomplishment of the interviewer, and so my ability to originate relevant oppugning throughout the procedure will find the profusion of the informations collected.

A farther positive facet of semi-structured interviews is that an docket can be developed ahead, including a list of inquiries and/or subjects that need to be covered during the conversation, normally in a peculiar order. The interviewer can follow the docket, but is still able to follow topical flights in the conversation that may roll from the usher when s/he feels this is appropriate.

However, as antecedently noted by Smith ( 2000 ) , the interviewer may give out unconscious signals and/or cues that guide participants to give replies expected by the interviewer. I need to take this possibility into consideration when carry oning the interviews and focal point groups, and seek to be consciously cognizant of my organic structure linguistic communication: ever seeking to do it positive and friendly. Unconscious signals are, nevertheless, highly hard to command, and the dynamic they create can surely impact on the procedure. On the other manus, these marks and signals, whether witting or unconscious, may really positively act upon the research procedure, and so help inform, non hinder.

For the intent of this survey, focal point groups and semi-structured interviews have been deemed the most appropriate methods and will both be involved.

There will be 2 – 4 focal point groups. The focal point groups will affect 6 – 8 homosexual young person. If required, and participants are available, the procedure will be repeated. It is expected the focal point groups will last about 45 proceedingss to 1 hr.

There will be 6 – 10 semi-structured interviews enduring about 45 proceedingss to 1 hr each. The semi-structured interviews will be for either the homosexual young person or ‘further afield ‘ participants, depending on the content highlighted from the old focal point groups.

The focal point groups and semi-structured interviews will take topographic point at Newcastle University.

Sample and sampling scheme

There will be 30 participants involved, gathered through sweet sand verbena sampling. This will include 15 cheery ‘youth ‘ and 15 people from ‘further afield ‘ within and throughout the participants ‘ lives.

A snowball sample is “ achieved by inquiring a participant to propose person else who might be willing or appropriate for the survey ” ( Smith, 2003:97 ) , and who fits the specific standards, i.e. homosexual ‘youth ‘ within the age scope of 16 – 30 twelvemonth old ‘youth ‘ as defined by Casey ( 2002 ) , and/or participants who are ‘further afield ‘ within and throughout the participants ‘ lives.

With respect to try entree, I have many contacts in the homosexual locales and young person groups that may be willing to assist ease entree, if approached.

With respect to inclusion standards, the participants must ab initio be cheery young person aged 16 – 30.

There will be 2 exclusion standards when choosing the sample. First, careful consideration was given when make up one’s minding on the age bracket of the homosexual young person ( 16-30 ) . The chief ground being that parental permission is non required if the participant is 16 + . This takes off the hazard of the immature individual being ‘outed ‘ by the research worker to their family/friends when bespeaking that informed consent paperss be completed. Therefore, no 1 under the age of 16 can participant in this survey.

Second, as an active member of the homosexual community, including some local support groups, I can corroborate that the participants would non be known to me personally, or drawn from my squad. Consequently, the group of homosexual young person ( that I work closely with ) would be exempt from this survey.

Data analysis schemes

Once the focal point groups / semi-structured interviews have been transcribed, open-ended thematic analysis would be the information analysis technique performed on the transcripts.

Thematic analysis holds many advantages, for illustration, its flexibleness. There is no 1 set of guidelines for the manner it is performed, and it can be “ applied across a scope of theoretical and epistemic attacks ( Boyatzis, 1998 ) , frequently defined as a realist / experiential method ” ( Aronson, 1994 ) . It provides a “ rich, elaborate, yet complex history of informations ” , doing it compatible within both “ essentialist and constructionist paradigms ” within psychological science ( Attride-Stirling, 2001 ; Braun and Clarke, 2006:18 ) .

The procedure of thematic analysis involves reading and so re-reading the transcripts legion times, observing subjects in the information ( Boyatzis, 1998 ; Braun and Clarke, 2006 ) . This creates a sort of ‘love-hate ‘ feeling towards the information. A subject is “ something of import within the informations in relation to the research inquiry ” ( Braun and Clarke, 2006 ) and frequently represents a “ degree of patterned significance within the dataset ” ( Boyatzis, 1998 ) . An of import inquiry to turn to in footings of cryptography is: “ what counts as a form? ” Braun and Clarke, 2006 ) recognises this as “ a inquiry of prevalence ” , in footings of both “ infinite within each information point, and of prevalence across the full dataset ” ( Braun and Clarke, 2006 ) .

Ethical motives

The participants will be de-briefed, giving their informed consent for the interview/focus groups to be recorded. They will besides be informed that the information collected will be kept confidential, and that they have the right to retreat any information at any clip. All participants will finish an informed consent signifier. This will summarize and enter the aforesaid verbal understanding between participant and research worker ( BSA, 2012 ) .

There will besides be an information sheet given to every participant. This will incorporate a contact telephone figure and email reference, so that participants are able to discourse any issues with the research worker. It will besides incorporate a figure of inquiries designed to back up the participant in reacting to any inquiries they may hold.

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member