Myth Of A Classless Essay Example

has an apple orchard. However, the neighbor argues that a good fence fosters good relationships. The speaker attempts to change the neighbor's viewpoint by influencing his thoughts, but the neighbor disregards these efforts. Consequently, the speaker becomes irritated and perceives the neighbor as a primitive person stuck in old ways. This situation is relatable due to its simplicity. Yet, by delving deeper into the poem, one can uncover the meanings that Robert Frost intended us to perceive. Primarily, as we understand that the speaker opposes unnecessary walls, it becomes apparent that it is the speaker who initiates the reconstruction of the wall, informing his neighbor beyond the hill. This evokes thought in readers regarding why he would undertake such action if he deems it unnecessary. One possibility could be that the speaker values his neighbor's companionship but becomes frustrated with him. Perhaps the speaker is lonely and any form of company is appreciated. They meet to walk along the line between their properties. It is plausible that by mending the wall between them, they are also repairing their friendship.The poem suggests various viable options and provides further explanation as to why the poet engages in this activity. When the two individuals begin constructing the wall, the use of words like "we" and "our" implies a sense of collaboration and companionship. The persona even refers to this task as an outdoor game, which conveys feelings of enjoyment, cooperation, and competition. Additionally, the imagery of walking the line on opposite sides evokes a visual image reminiscent of a tennis game. It is important to note that the perspective shared in the poem is from the persona's point

of view, not directly from Frost himself. Therefore, readers should be cautious and recognize that the persona might be mistaken in some of their comments. In one particular comment, the persona straightforwardly states that there is no need for the wall to exist. This remark makes readers feel as if the persona is denying the role of the wall in bringing the two men together to cooperate and converse with each other to a certain extent. The following line further emphasizes their differences by contrasting their individual characteristics - one being described as "all pine" while the other is characterized as "all apple orchard".The proximity of this statement to the discussion of the uselessness of the wall suggests that such attitudes create a barrier between people, leading to segregation. The persona's apple trees are personified to illustrate how he undermines his neighbor. My apple trees will never cross over and eat his pine cones. Although this comment is lighthearted and humorous, it implies that the persona considers himself more intelligent than his neighbor, therefore feeling the need to explain why the wall is unnecessary. The roots of human nature are deeply embedded in our history and experiences. When searching for the foundation of our human nature, we must reflect on our early, formative years. For instance, imagine placing a newborn in the wilderness or in a sophisticated, wealthy family. The newborn in the wild will naturally possess a wild and chaotic human nature, whereas the one in a well-mannered society will exhibit civilized and moral behavior.The text reveals the depiction of an elderly couple and the conversations between Jennie and Old Jeff Patton in The

Summer Stragedy. Through these elements, the story sheds light on the life of a family residing in the lower class of society. The essence of human nature is determined by the principles ingrained and those defined by society. If societal values are absent, human nature is bound to decline and become comparable to that of wolves.