Impact of Media on Politic and Law Essay Example

TV. However, inconsistent media coverage can impact political debates and ultimately shape the resulting laws due to the often lengthy and technical nature of these processes. While journalists cannot directly pass laws themselves, they can influence officials' behavior by emphasizing a bill with media reasoning.

(Loane, 2006) Media and strategic performers collaborating can drive policy change by leveraging the influence of news media as a crucial information source in elections across various countries. Canada demonstrates this well, with social media playing a vital role in politicians' campaigns, facilitating quick connections with a wide voter base. In an era where immediate results are expected, politicians cannot afford to develop new TV ads or participate in public speaking events to communicate their message. Like any brand, politicians must promptly address and offer solutions to the public.

In addition, web-based social networking enables users not just to hear the messages that leaders are promoting, but also to engage and have their voices heard, which is vital in involving the millennial generation in voting.

The media has a crucial role in the election process by providing analysis and discussions on the successes and failures of candidates, governments, and other electoral bodies. It educates the public on their performance and holds them accountable.

Moreover, the media has multiple functions in facilitating public participation in elections. It educates voters on how to exercise their democratic rights, documents election campaign progress, provides a platform for political parties and candidates to convey messages to the public. It also allows individuals to express concerns, opinions, and needs while enabling communication between parties and candidates.

Additionally, the media reports election results and monitors vote counting. It assesses the effectiveness and

integrity of the electoral process itself including electoral administration.

The media plays a critical role in informing the public about current events and shedding light on various societal issues. It goes beyond what many would consider imaginable while avoiding language that could incite racial violence.

The media's influence on people's perspectives and views is substantial, shaping public opinion and occasionally manipulating it. This influence becomes especially crucial during significant time periods like elections, when the media assumes a prominent role (Clarke, 2009). Elections pose a challenge to the media as its impartiality and objectivity face scrutiny. The media, particularly national outlets, should not aim to represent any particular organization or individual.

The media's primary function is to educate and inform the general population. It also serves as an unbiased and objective platform for the free exchange of ideas. Thanks to advancements in media, governments have implemented regulations that simplify the process of individuals moving between countries without extensive documentation procedures (Bertot, 2012). The Department of State and other organizations are utilizing technology tools to actively engage citizens and gauge public opinion on policy matters. For example, the State Department employs Opinion Space, an online tool that allows the public to visually express their opinions on current issues and vote on others' ideas. These advancements, along with the increasing influence of global alliances, intergovernmental organizations, and non-state actors, have created a borderless world where nation-states hold less significance.

Despite some people believing that national governments remain strong and show no signs of decline, there is evidence suggesting otherwise. States still retain the power to impose taxes, pass laws, engage in warfare, control territories, and occasionally suppress dissent among their own

citizens and others. However, the advent of the communication revolution has significantly impacted global politics. In the past, only statesmen made crucial decisions regarding global affairs while traditional mass media informed the public. Today, numerous voices demanding attention have emerged including social movements and minority groups. As a result of these changes, different legal processes have been developed to accommodate these voices and ensure compliance with international laws while maintaining fairness.

Computerized advances and online networking stages have had a significant impact in the field of war costs, allowing subject journalists to provide firsthand accounts through various tools like blogs, tweets, SMS messages, camera phones, and other means that mainstream media may overlook. Governments have introduced laws to disseminate information about negative events even if they go against established norms. The media has also played a role in setting regulations regarding hate speech, especially concerning government matters and discrimination. These regulations aim to promote good corporate governance, protect individual rights in the workplace, and ensure leaders adhere to certain standards.

The Canadian government is competing with other manufacturing businesses by integrating the legislature into newspaper delivery activities. This competition promotes the use of all available resources including social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook. The government's goal is to avoid excessive involvement in printed materials similar to smaller firms in the market.

The Canadian government has implemented distribution bans that are guided by the principles of ensuring security and the sacred right of every criminal litigant to a fair trial. These bans aim to prevent media reports from disclosing criminal records, improper evidence, or any other information that could bias a jury and impact a case. One

type of ban is publication bans based on inherent jurisdiction, where judges have the power to create and enforce bans beyond those provided by law in order to regulate situations where the publication of evidence could compromise the right to a fair trial or invade privacy. A common example is when individuals accused of the same crime are tried separately - a judge often prohibits the publication of information during the first trial that could implicate co-defendants who are still awaiting trial. A similar approach may be taken when one person confesses and is convicted while one or more co-defendants are awaiting trial. Another type of ban is statutory distribution bans, which have some general characteristics. (Thussu, 2006).

Openness requires that individuals exercise caution and restraint to a certain extent. While some bans are imposed naturally, journalists are generally informed when a ban is being enforced. In criminal trials, judges have the discretion to avoid imposing certain bans if requested by the Crown, but their options are limited if the defendant makes the request. Journalists have the right to remain in the court and can take notes for future reference. This right is crucial because most bans (although not all) expire once charges are dropped, the defendant confesses, or a verdict is reached – when there is no longer a need to protect the defendant's right to a fair trial.

The unveiling of information has been done in a manner where there are no restrictions for the law to provide details about specific crimes.

References

• Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of

policies on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government information quarterly, 29(1), 30-40.

A. (2009). Mass media and American politics. Sage.

Loane, S., & Bell, J.

(2006). Rapid internationalisation among entrepreneurial firms in Australia, Canada, Ireland, and New Zealand: An extension to the network approach. International marketing review, 23(5), 467-485.

(Ed.). (2006). Media on the move: global flow and contra-flow. Routledge.