It’s an age old argument, men are all around better than women. For decades a women’s job was in the kitchen, cooking meals or taking care of the children although for most of us these views are now outdated. The army however seems to think they still apply. Looking back though history we read of Joan of Arc, the French freedom fighter and of the Sufferage movements and we see women throughout the ages were getting involved with fighting and politics of war. The argument over whether to allow women on the frontlines of warfare has been highly discussed over the past few years but still in today’s “equal society” women are not being given the same opportunities as men.
Around the world, countries have already enlisted women into their ranks although several countries, incl
...uding Britain still do not allow women on their frontlines. In Britain women are still excluded from primary combat. Following this line of argument this means that although women make up 12% of the armed forces and around 600 women are serving in Afganistan, none of these women are allowed to serve in the Infantry, Royal Marines, SAS or on submarines, niether are they allowed to drive tanks or minesweepers. Shocking isn’t it?
However, the idea that frontlines still exist within modern warfare is now flawed as the lines in today’s battle ground are indistinct. The existing circumstances in Iraq prove this as women are being killed in even if they are not performing ‘frontline’ duties. For example around 135 women have already been killed in Iraq while carrying out duties such as searches at checkpoints o
routine raids – neither of these tasks are deemed to be frontline material – showing that women are in danger irrespective of where they are serving in the armed forces. So why then are we still not allowing women to take their rightful places among men, as surely if women are going to be in danger anyway they should be given the equal opportunities as to where to fight?
The main excuse as to why women can’t fight on these frontlines is that they are not emotionally capable of killing another person. However if we look at the number of women in prison for murder or any violent offence we soon see this is not the case. Women have the mental capacity to kill another and this line of denial that our military top dogs are taking is ridiculous. As their second line of defence they will resort to the argument that: women are not strong to serve on the frontline. This is an unfounded debate. It is correct in that some women do not show the physical prowess of their male colleagues. But then again, there are plenty that do. Also the military training would work the same for women as it does for men in the way that women who meet the standards required of them would be drafted in the others would be let go.
This argument is reinforced by a statement from Australian Defence Minister “If an individual woman has got the physical, mental and psychological capacity to do a job, then if they can do the job on merit, pass the same standards that a man passes, qualify
in the same way a man does, then she should not be excluded”. We also see that none of countries that have already allowed women to serve in there militaries, like Australia and the USA, have went back on their decision and withdrawn any rulings so something must be going right.
The only debate, I find that has any basis to it is the possibility of sexual harassment towards female soldiers. However, isn’t what would happen within the army is just reflecting what already exists in any of the workforces and in wider society in general. This is seen by the fact that an American investigation into three of its military training academies and camps found that 14% of female students reported being sexually assaulted and nearly half reported sexual harassment and the statistics show that this is as much a reality in civilian life as it is in the military. And is it not fair to mention that women pursuing a military frontline career will be fully aware of this, and accept the risks involved in their chosen area of work.
Whatever way you look at it, women not being giving the same opportunities within the job market options as men is sexism at its most basic level. Whatever you can say about women, whether it is physical or mental may apply to some but certainly not to all. Also doesn’t the ideology of an equal society imply that all prospects should be – well – equal? The idea of not letting women fight on the front lines like men is uninformed. As I have proved women are in danger regardless of
what part of the armed forces they are in, and also women can have the agility to keep up with men on the frontlines. Therefore women should be allowed to train for and be drafted into the ‘frontlines’ of our military.
- Air Force essays
- Army essays
- Soldiers essays
- Army Values essays
- United States Army essays
- Veteran essays
- Aircraft essays
- Sergeant essays
- Feminism essays
- Animal Rights essays
- Animal Testing essays
- Bullying essays
- Abortion essays
- Abuse essays
- Immigration essays
- Poverty essays
- Human Rights essays
- Inequality essays
- Violence essays
- Torture essays
- Crash essays
- Assault essays
- Racism essays
- Prejudice essays
- Controversial Issue essays
- Cyber Bullying essays
- Women's Suffrage essays
- Women'S Rights essays
- Women Empowerment essays
- Sojourner Truth essays
- Bullying In Schools essays
- Pro Choice essays
- Pro Life essays
- Should Abortion Be Legal essays
- Against abortion essays
- Abortion Debate essays
- Abuse Support essays
- Child Abuse essays
- Alcohol Abuse essays
- Physical Abuse essays
- Sexual Abuse essays
- Substance Abuse essays
- Migration essays
- Human Migration essays
- Illegal Immigration essays
- Immigrants essays
- Refugee essays
- Overpopulation essays
- Homelessness essays
- Hunger essays