Most war novels overlook the role of binary linguistic oppositions. However, Timothy Findley defies this trend in The Wars by emphasizing the psychological effects of war on the human mind. This award-winning novel revolves around the First World War and follows Robert Ross, a young Canadian who joins the military after his sister's tragic death.
Robert must face the difficulties of war, navigate the path to adulthood, and form new beliefs to endure the war. He confronts various challenges that compel him to reassess the truths that underpin his existence. This exemplifies deconstructive criticism, as it signifies the moment when individuals question their truths and acknowledge the absence of a singular truth. Instead, there are multiple linguistic contradictions surrounding the same occurrence, which vary based on one's viewpoint.
The Wars by Timothy Findl
...ey uses Deconstructive Criticism to challenge misconceptions that it is merely another novel about World War I. The book exposes uncertainties and inconsistencies within internal struggles, including the psychological battle between sanity and insanity, the blurred line between friend and foe, and the deceptive nature of war.
The novel reveals multiple indications that hint at the uncertainties of the psychological struggle between sanity and insanity that people undergo. These ambiguities become evident after the commencement of the physical war in the story. The actual war serves as a catalyst, provoking internal conflicts within the minds of numerous World War I soldiers. This is exemplified by Levitt's behavior following the destruction of their dugout as a result of a German attack; he expresses, "'I'm looking for somewhere to put down my book'" (Findley 111).
Rodwell and Robert se
Levitt's actions as crazy because he prioritizes his books over the safety of his fellow soldiers. However, others may view his behavior as an effort to protect what gives him purpose in life. Therefore, it is impossible to label someone as sane or insane since different people can interpret the same event differently.
Vincent B. Leitch, a former literature professor at the University of Florida, provides further explanation of the lens of deconstruction by stating that it systematically illustrates the impossibility of single or literal interpretations (Leitch 24). Findley also exemplifies the deconstruction of sanity and insanity through the suicide of Rodwell. Rodwell, compelled to witness the murder of a cat by his fellow soldiers, eventually finds himself wandering into No Man's Land and ultimately ending his own life by shooting himself in the ears (Findley 135).
Rodwell's actions after killing an animal may be seen as insane by many because his love for animals surpasses that of humans. Despite the cruelty and mass killing of humans in war, Rodwell is deeply affected by the death of a single animal. However, a closer examination of the situation from Rodwell's perspective unveils a different aspect of the story. At this stage in the novel, it becomes clear that Rodwell shares a profound bond with animals, much like Robert does.
Rodwell uses animals as a coping mechanism and an escape from the brutal reality of war. This is justified by the senseless destruction of the natural world and the endless capacity for cruelty that destroys his faith in the world. Findley's depiction of sanity and insanity in The Wars adds an interesting element for
readers, allowing them to interpret and draw conclusions based on their own perspective rather than being constrained by definitive conclusions.
In The Wars, the reader is given the power to determine the mental strength or weakness of characters based on their actions. This is closely linked to the distinction between friend and enemy, which is another psychological struggle soldiers face during war. Findley presents this distinction in a way that cannot be ignored in the novel. Similar to sanity and insanity, the breaking down of friend and enemy becomes evident once the physical war begins.
The encounter between Robert and a young German soldier highlights the contrast between friends and enemies. Robert noticed that the young German soldier was wearing fingerless woollen mittens (Findley 128). This description immediately reminds the readers of Robert's friend, Harris. In fact, earlier in the novel, the archivist mentions that the soldiers who exchanged fire with Robert wore blue scarves or grey mittens similar to his own (Findley 82).
Findley employs these events as pivotal moments to challenge the readers' ingrained thought processes and make them doubt their beliefs about who is a friend or an enemy. While the German soldier is armed, he clearly had no intention of harming them, as evidenced by his gesture of setting them free (Findley 129). This surprising turn of events shocks both Robert and the reader. Some arguments suggest that the German soldier's actions can be attributed to his inexperience in warfare, making it difficult for him to distinguish between friends and enemies despite his young age. Despite the young soldier's harmless intentions, Robert shoots him out of panic.
justify">
Findley illustrates the notion of linguistic opposites by mentioning, “He would have to turn his back on the German. Well. There was no other way” (Findley 130). This implies the idea that once an enemy, always an enemy, even if the enemy displays unexpected characteristics of a foe. However, The Wars states, “Harris’s scarf got caught on the Lewis gun and Robert had to tear it way” (Findley 130). This suggests to Robert that the German soldier is not truly an enemy, as depicted by the fact that the Lewis gun becomes entangled with Harris’s scarf.
Nick Mansfield, a professor at Flinders University in Adelaide, Australia, asserts that it is conceivable for an individual to simultaneously be a friend and an enemy. Mansfield clarifies that this circumstance arises when someone maintains personal affability with another person while being affiliated with a political faction that deems that person as an adversary. This scenario echoes the situation Robert confronts upon encountering a young German soldier. Despite sparing Robert's life and the lives of his comrades, society continues to perceive him as the enemy due to his donning of a German uniform.
Findley explores the distinction between friend and enemy through the rape scene involving Robert. In this scene, it is revealed that his assailants, who he initially believed to be crazies, were actually his fellow soldiers, possibly even his brother officers (Findley 175). This highlights the ambiguity of terms like friend and enemy, as Robert's own comrades engage in acts that characterize them as enemies rather than friends. It could be argued that the young German soldier demonstrates more qualities of friendship compared to
some of Robert's own troops. Ultimately, this act challenges societal norms surrounding the concept of friend and enemy.
According to Vincent B Leitch, deconstructive criticism involves intentionally overturning traditional oppositions in themes and emphasizing the mysterious and disorienting interplay of previously unseen concepts discovered in the gap between opposing terms. The rape scene of Robert clearly illustrates Leitch's point as it confuses the meaning of friend and enemy. Psychologist Robert Epstein, who earned a Ph.D. from Harvard University, argues that deconstruction suggests that no meaning is literal and the literal is opposite to the figurative. Findley achieves this by subverting meanings and causing readers to question their understanding of internal battles between friends and enemies, as well as the distinction between illusion and reality - a psychologically intense battle that many soldiers experienced during World War I. In The Wars, Findley leaves an enduring mark of these psychological battles between illusion and reality, which can be seen in various characters, particularly Robert and Clifford.
The text portrays Robert's initial visit to France as insufficient in capturing the true essence of the country during wartime, except for what one can envision mentally. This showcases how soldiers frequently encounter a shattered perception and confront a horrifying war reality, rendering their previous beliefs entirely illusory. The demise of Clifford Purchas further emphasizes the psychological battle between war's illusion and reality. Robert stumbles upon Clifford's lifeless body, abandoned on the ground after being shot in the back.
This illustrates how Clifford's experience with illusion and reality unfolds. He is shot by his fellow soldiers while desperately trying to escape the brutality of war. In an earlier
part of the novel, Clifford expresses that the war provided him with a chance to become a man. However, his actions on the battlefield contradict this interpretation completely. Timothy Findley employs a clever use of language to carefully break down these concepts as the novel unfolds.
According to Harper Collins, deconstruction aims to expose the distorted and ambiguous nature of reality and the elliptical nature of language. The novel The Wars effectively challenges the traditional perception of soldiers as heroic figures through its portrayal of war (Collins N. P).
In the text "The Wars" by Timothy Findley, deconstructive criticism is used to draw attention to the psychological dimension of war. It emphasizes that internal conflicts can be equally damaging as physical conflicts. The book delves into the intricacies of sanity and madness, the ambiguous distinction between ally and foe, and the blurred boundary between fantasy and actuality in times of war.
Findley explores the complexities of sanity and insanity in The Wars through various actions and events. These include Levitt's response to the collapse of the dugout, Rodwell's suicide, and Robert's endeavor to save animals facing certain death. The deconstruction of sanity and insanity is skillfully woven into the narrative, allowing readers to interpret the story based on their own perspectives. The theme of friend and enemy is central to The Wars, as evident in Robert's encounter with a German soldier and the disturbing rape scene.
In "The Wars," Findley employs a deconstructive method that prompts readers to reconsider their beliefs in binary concepts. The characters of Robert, Clifford, and Rodwell demonstrate the interplay between illusion and reality, revealing the psychological
toll that war takes on them. Through this deconstruction, Findley emphasizes that there are numerous battles beyond the physical aspect of war, as depicted in the novel's title: "The Wars".
- Building essays
- Unconscious Mind essays
- World War I essays
- World War Ii essays
- Atomic Bomb essays
- American Civil War essays
- Attack essays
- Cold War essays
- Crimean War essays
- Emilio Aguinaldo essays
- Iraq War essays
- Korean War essays
- Nazism essays
- Nuclear Weapon essays
- Philippine Revolution essays
- Trench Warfare essays
- Vietnam War essays
- Western Front essays
- Diplomacy essays
- Emperor essays
- Rwanda essays
- Tribe essays
- Revolutionary War essays
- War of 1812 essays
- Mexican American War essays
- Hitler essays
- The Spanish American War essays
- League Of Nations essays
- Battle Of The Somme essays
- Treaty Of Versailles essays
- Fascism essays
- D-day essays
- Atomic Physics essays
- Atomic Bombings Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki essays
- Electron essays
- Automotive essays
- Automotive Industry essays
- Commerce essays
- Construction essays
- E Commerce essays
- Grocery stores essays
- Paper Industry essays
- Pharmaceutical industry essays
- Pharmacy essays
- Polymers essays
- Real Estate essays
- Textile Industry essays
- Bias essays
- Big Five Personality Traits essays
- Body Image essays
Unfortunately copying the content is not possible
Tell us your email address and we’ll send this sample there.
By continuing, you agree to our Terms and Conditions.