Animal Testing, Bad Idea Essay Example

determine its level of irritation, while the latter includes multiple applications of substances onto an animal's skin to observe their effects. Nevertheless, depending on the substance, innocent animals can suffer severe consequences from these tests (Lindsay III).

The act of subjecting animals to painful side effects and suffering for medical testing purposes contradicts the purpose of the medical field, which is to cure and assist others. This cruelty extends even to minor categories such as cosmetic testing, which informs companies of the risks associated with some products.

Conducting cosmetic tests has no significant impact on curing diseases or saving human lives. Despite its limited benefit to humans and negative impact on animals, why continue this practice? These experiments have resulted in the deaths of countless innocent animals. Nevertheless, proponents argue that animal testing has contributed significantly to medical knowledge and saved lives. For instance, chemotherapy has enabled around seventy percent of children with leukemia to survive (Finsen 22). Also, without medication to control high blood pressure, sixty million Americans would be at risk of stroke, kidney failure, and heart attack (Finsen 21).

While it's understandable that the opposing side disagrees with the government's decision to conduct experiments on animals, the reality is that it is both a time-consuming and costly process. The government funds a multitude of experiments on animals each day, which amounts to a staggering fourteen billion dollars annually for biomedical research (Thomas). Furthermore, it costs an additional five hundred million dollars just to fully approve one product (Thomas). One can only imagine the exorbitant costs involved in testing and approving one thousand drugs.

The government's expenditure on animal experimentation is excessive, given that it results

in the death of millions of animals. Rather than spending money on such cruel practices, the funds could better serve a charitable cause. Jill Fritz, the President of San Diego Animal Advocates, concurs that the government's resources could be directed more effectively by investing in preventive medicine and education instead of the torture of animals.

It is a common occurrence to hear that schools have to eliminate activities like sports due to insufficient funds, while money spent on animal experimentation could be redirected to schools for greater benefit. Given the wasteful spending of the government, it would be wise to ban animal testing as it involves inhumane treatment of animals.

Repeatingly, innocent animals are subjected to physical and mental suffering through experiments. A typical test method nowadays compels creatures to consume increasing doses of chemicals until they expire (Kelly). Inflicting poison inhalation on an animal is a form of both cruelty and torture. Animal experimentation is comparable to sinister crimes such as murder or rape; creatures are being killed without any visible justification. Even if alleged benefits exist, infecting monkeys with AIDS or exposing rodents to radiation and toxic substances is not acceptable. If humans are incarcerated for killing other humans, the punishment for killing animals should be the same.

Government officials permit animal testing, which enables scientists to carry out numerous experiments on animals resulting in approximately 100,000 to 125,000 creatures receiving chemical injections and experiencing severe pain every hour (Kelly). It is crucial to explore alternatives to using animals for experimentation since this practice is barbaric and intolerable. It is worthwhile contemplating how you would feel if subjected to such cruelty.

Eliminating animal testing is crucial, given

that it results in the demise of innocent creatures and brings about avoidable agony and suffering. Additionally, supporting such experiments with government funding is a waste since the funds could be better utilized for education and other pressing issues. It's vital to acknowledge that animals are living beings who should not undergo torture, like procedures involving needle injections into their eyes.