A Comparison of Free Speech and Hate Speech in France Essay Example

threat to free speech this year. This is not because of intimidation, as the French did not cave into the demands of the terrorists. Charlie Hebdo had no choice but to publish a depiction of Muhammad, following the attack.

If they hadn't, the terrorists would have won and set an example that violence can silence criticism of a belief system. Muslims do have the free speech to express their anger at Charlie Hebdo for publishing a caricature of their prophet. However, being offended, does not mean hate speech has occurred. Freedom of speech may cover publications, like Charlie Hebdo, but they do not add anything constructive to any idea. Free speech can be used to mock any religion. But buying a magazine or newspaper that mocks a religion for no reason other than to offend the followers of that religion, adds nothing to society.

Freedom of speech does work both ways. The freedom to ignore and ridicule other people does exist. However, Charlie Hebdo was heading towards bankruptcy for a reason. France is a country where even minorities can express their views, without the fear of being prosecuted.

Ridiculing a belief system and is protected under free speech, as long as one does not incite hate or violence against the followers of that belief system. Free speech allows a society to openly voice their beliefs, and hopefully those beliefs contribute to society. However, a group simply being offended by one's opinion does not make that opinion hate speech.