Means of Dispute Settlement Essay Example
Means of Dispute Settlement Essay Example

Means of Dispute Settlement Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 2 (498 words)
  • Published: December 10, 2021
View Entire Sample
Text preview

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) refers to any approaches used to resolve legal business disputes without resorting to litigation. ADR methods encompass arbitration, mediation, collaborative law, and neutral evaluation. As compared to traditional methods, these specific approaches are typically more informal, confidential, and less time-consuming. Consequently, they are ideal for addressing business and personal disputes wherein parties seek to avoid lengthy legal procedures. ADR is recognized for its efficiency and cost-effectiveness in settling disputes swiftly.

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) has a lasting impact, offers satisfaction, and enhances relations among parties involved. This article examines different forms of ADR and presents evidence that supports their effectiveness. Arbitration is the most widely favored and advantageous type of ADR. It entails a neutral arbitrator who listens to arguments and evidence from both sides before renderin

...

g a decision on the case. Arbitration can be either binding or nonbinding.

Binding arbitration is a method of resolving disputes where the arbitrator's decision cannot be appealed, while nonbinding arbitration allows parties to seek a trial if they are dissatisfied with the arbitrator's ruling. This approach gives parties control over both the process and outcome. Mediation, on the other hand, involves a neutral mediator assisting parties in reaching an agreement that satisfies all involved individuals.The primary role of a mediator is to assist in communication and conflict resolution, rather than directly resolving the problem. However, this approach may not be suitable or effective when one party has more power, potentially leading to domination over the other party. Regardless, it plays a crucial role in resolving conflicts between stock brokers and investors. Another method in alternate dispute resolution (ADR) is neutral evaluation, where both parties present thei

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

arguments to an impartial evaluator.

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) involves various methods to resolve disputes and achieve a resolution. A crucial part of this process is the evaluator, who is usually an expert in the relevant field. The evaluator examines the evidence presented by each party, identifying their strengths and weaknesses. This evaluation serves as the basis for the parties involved to work towards a resolution, although it is often not legally binding (Davidson et al. 426). Another commonly used approach in ADR is case conferencing.

In this method of case conferencing, it can be mandatory or involuntary and usually there is a judge or a representative of the judge that meets with the parties together with their attorneys so as to try and settle the dispute before it commences into a trial. The major limitation in this method is that the parties are very limited in their participation hence the focus is usually to narrow the issues of the dispute. The other limitation is that the judge does not make the decision for these disputes but aids them in evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of each case towards reaching and negotiating for settlement of the dispute.
Work cited:

  • Davidson, Daniel V, Lynn M. Forsythe, and Brenda E. Knowles. Business Law: Principles and Cases in the Legal Environment. , 2014. Print.
Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New