View Of Marriage And Sexuality Theology Religion
View Of Marriage And Sexuality Theology Religion

View Of Marriage And Sexuality Theology Religion

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 8 (3903 words)
  • Published: October 4, 2017
Text preview

When one examines the early church ‘s position of matrimony and gender, one enters into a complex universe. General statements are hard to do, and one makes them at one ‘s ain hazard. Even within the New Testament there are many positions of matrimony and gender, which could be marshaled to back up a multiplicity of positions, even contradictory 1s. For case, one can confirm the goodness of matrimony by stressing Jesus ‘ words of Matthew 19:5 and Mark 10:8, which defend the legitimacy of matrimony and the bastardy of divorce. [ 1 ] Similarly, one can indicate out that in John 2:1-10 Jesus visits a nuptials banquet and execute his first miracle by transforming H2O into vino thereby non merely blessing the nuptials ceremonial, but besides kick offing an age of copiousness. [ 2 ] One can even mention to the book of Revelation, which depicts Jesus as the groom of the church in an eschatological nuptials. [ 3 ] When one adds the Hebrew Bible, the positive image for gender and matrimony is even stronger. [ 4 ]

However, this image is non the full narrative. One is able to foreground many other transitions in the New Testament and come to a diametrically different decision. A twosome of logical tax write-offs and illations can take a individual on an ascetic path. Did non Jesus talk about denying oneself to follow him? [ 5 ] And did non Paul province that it is better to stay in a province of virginity, even if it is permitted to get married? [ 6 ] Furthe

...

rmore, Jesus even leaves open the chance of taking to be a eunuch for the land of God. [ 7 ] If one takes these words at face value, those who give up matrimony are in some sense better. This is exactly the ground why “ [ subsequently ] monastics ever looked back to the apostolic Church as the beginning of their manner of life. “ [ 8 ]

If one were now to see non-canonical texts, the image would look about hopelessly complex, non in the least, because in the early church the canon was a fluid construct. For illustration, Bentley Layton writes, “ Since there is nil particularly sectarian about the Thomas Bible, it must hold been a portion of the normal canon of Bible read by Mesopotamian Christians in the 2nd and early 3rd centuries. “ [ 9 ] I am certain that systematic theologists and historiographers can harmonise these texts, but I am besides certain that they will come to different decisions, which is the point. The position of matrimony and gender in the ancient church is a complex one.

Notwithstanding this complex image, there does look to hold been a alteration in position and pattern of matrimony in the history of the ancient church. The thought of virginity and asceticism began to turn. As Wayne Meeks says, “ Christianityaˆ¦democratized asceticism. “ [ 10 ] In other words, the chorus of the antediluvian anthem, “ I keep myself pure for thee, O Bridegroom, and keeping a lighted torch I go to run into thee, ”

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay
View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

11 ] is in some ways different from Jesus ‘ apprehension of matrimony. More pointedly, the narrative of a “ monastic who dipped his cloak into the putrefying flesh of a dead adult female, so that the odor might ostracize ideas of her, ” [ 12 ] must be judged as going from the pattern of the earliest Christian communities.

The purpose of this paper will non be to offer an account for the rise of virginity in the ancient church ; it is much more modest. The end of this paper will be to analyze one figure of the ancient universe, Clement, and his position of matrimony and gender. I have chosen Clement for two grounds. First, Clement is a transitional figure in the rise of ascetic positions of matrimony in the church. It is clear from Clement ‘s Hagiographas that he is contending on two foreparts – non merely against those who claim freedom from morality, but besides those who disparage and reject matrimony wholly. [ 13 ] Therefore, an scrutiny of Clement ‘s plants may uncover penetrations into the battles of the church ‘s apprehension of matrimony and gender. Another benefit of analyzing Clement is that he is steadfastly rooted in Classical civilization. Even a cursory glimpse at Clement ‘s Hagiographas will demo a individual who possesses equal installation in utilizing Homer, Plato, Philo and Christian literature. Therefore, an scrutiny of Clement may offer understanding on how the Greco-Roman universe contributed, if at all, to the rise of ascetic patterns in the church. In position of these points, subdivision two of this paper will analyze Clement ‘s apprehension of matrimony and gender. Section three will offer a few remarks on the rise of virginity in the church.

2. Marriage and Sexuality in Clement

Even before one considers Clement ‘s position of matrimony and gender, the first point to emphasize is that Clement did non denounce matrimony or sex ; he merely regulated it. [ 14 ] In fact, the many ordinances that are found in Clement are likely the most conspicuous characteristic of his work. Clement has guidelines for everything. He remarks on nutrient, drink, table manners, bearing, slumber, laughter, and even vesture. This subdivision will concentrate on Clement ‘s apprehension of matrimony and sex. More peculiarly, this subdivision will concentrate on three inside informations: when one should prosecute in sexual intercourse ; with whom one should mate ; and eventually the proper mode of sexual activity. [ 15 ]

a. When

Clement offers two guidelines refering appropriate times for sexual intercourse. First, he states that the lone proper clip for sexual intercourse is after matrimony ; anything prior to this, he states, is fornication. Second, even within the bonds of matrimony, he states that there are appropriate times for sexual intercourse.

Clement ‘s get downing point in his treatment of gender in the Paidogogos is that sexual intercourse is confined to marriage entirely. “ It remains for us now to see the limitation of sexual intercourse to those who are joined in marriage. “ [ 16 ] This point may look excessively obvious to do ( what else would a church leader

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay