Strict Interpretation Of The Constitution Flashcards, test questions and answers

Discover flashcards, test exam answers, and assignments to help you learn more about Strict Interpretation Of The Constitution and other subjects. Don’t miss the chance to use them for more effective college education. Use our database of questions and answers on Strict Interpretation Of The Constitution and get quick solutions for your test.

What is Strict Interpretation Of The Constitution?

The strict interpretation of the Constitution is a principle that has been embraced by many in the United States, particularly those on the political right. This approach to interpreting the Constitution requires an exact and literal translation of its words rather than looking to outside sources or considering context for guidance. Proponents believe this method best reflects the original intent of the Founding Fathers when they drafted America’s foundational document.Those who embrace strict interpretation would suggest that any amendment or law passed by Congress must be consistent with what is explicitly stated in the Constitution as written even if it contradicts current values and norms. It also means that interpretations cannot take into account changing societal views; instead, language should remain interpreted according to what was originally intended in 1787 when it was first ratified. Additionally, this approach completely discounts any opinions voiced by Supreme Court justices throughout history, since these are considered subjective interpretations and not necessarily based solely on legal precedent or judicial authority. This differs from other kinds of constitutional interpretation such as living Constitution theory which suggests that some areas of Constitutional understanding may need updating due to changes in society over time (as opposed to remaining static). Additionally, while advocates of strict interpretation embrace textualism a school of thought focused on following only what is written other scholars might employ principles such as structuralism (looking at how different parts interact) or originalist doctrine (seeking to understand why particular clauses were included). Ultimately, though there are several ways to interpret our country’s founding document, strong adherents will continue advocating for a strict reading regardless because it provides clarity and consistency regarding national policy decisions within existing parameters.