Read the sample student claim and counterclaim. Claim: Although many people argue that medical testing on animals is a violation of animal rights, the benefits it yields for society far outweigh any argument that can be made. Counterclaim: There are safer and more accurate ways to test medications without using animals. What evidence would most weaken the counterclaim presented here?

The physiologies of humans and some animals are very similar, so the reactions of these creatures to certain medications are the most reliable guide to the possible reactions of human patients. Scientists are more easily able to control an animal’s environment, such as diet and temperature, than they are that of humans, which makes the tests far more reliable than alternative methods. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/writing-an-argumentative-editorial-about-initiating-change-comparing-accounts-of-iqbals-story-word-choice-and-authors-purpose-in-warriors-dont-cry/

The AMA’s Code of Ethics indicates the basic ethical values marketers should aspire to include a) maximizing stockholder wealth. b) health, wealth and the pursuit of happiness. c) individual freedom and the pursuit of the American dream. d) self-respect, concern for nature, animal rights, and global peace. e) honesty, responsibility, fairness, respect, openness, and citizenship.

E) Honesty, Responsibility, Fairness, Respect, Openness, and Citizenship More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/marketing-200-chapter-4-quiz/

Read the sample student claim and the reasons listed for making this claim. Claim: Although many people argue that medical testing on animals is a violation of animal rights, the benefits it yields for society far outweigh any argument that can be made. Reason #1: Animal research has yielded both pain-relieving and life-saving drugs for humans. Reason #2: Laws prohibit scientists from using animal-based research in cases where non-animal testing would produce equally clear and valid results. Which piece of evidence would best support reason #1?

Animal research played an essential role in the development of Herceptin and Tamoxifen, two medications that have already saved the lives of thousands of women who have been diagnosed with breast cancer. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/writing-an-argumentative-editorial-about-initiating-change-comparing-accounts-of-iqbals-story-word-choice-and-authors-purpose-in-warriors-dont-cry/

A researcher interested in studying individuals’ attitudes toward “animal rights issues” would MOST likely conduct A. a naturalistic observation. B. a survey. C. a correlation. D. a case study.

B More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/chapter-02-quiz/

Read the sample student claim and the reasons listed for making this claim. Claim: Although many people argue that medical testing on animals is a violation of animal rights, the benefits it yields for society far outweigh any argument that can be made. Reason #1: Animal research has yielded both pain-relieving and life-saving drugs for humans. Reason #2: Laws prohibit scientists from using animal-based research in cases where non-animal testing would produce equally clear and valid results. Which piece of evidence would best support reason #2?

Enacted in 1966, the Animal Welfare Act is a US federal law that regulates the care and use of animals in a variety of circumstances, including medical research and testing. People will not tolerate the suffering of animals, so it is only logical that scientists will only use animal testing as a last resort when all other measures have failed. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/writing-an-argumentative-editorial-about-initiating-change-comparing-accounts-of-iqbals-story-word-choice-and-authors-purpose-in-warriors-dont-cry/

1. Violent religious groups/doomsday cults -include groups such as Aum Shinrikyo (tokyo subway) -may participate in apocalyptic violence2. Extremist political groups -may include violent separatist groups and those who seek political, religious, economic, and social freedom -e.g. Taliban militant groups3. Technology terrorists -those who attack a population’s technological infrastructure as a means to draw attention to their cause, such as cyberterrorists 4. Single-issue groups -these include antiabortion groups, animal rights groups, anarchists, racists, and even ecoterrorists who threaten or use violence as a means to protect the environment

What are the different types of groups that may turn toward terrorism as a means to achieve their goals? More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/chapter-39-emt-terrorism-response-and-disaster-management/

Home Page Arts And Humanities English Linguistics Animal Rights

Animal Rights Flashcards, test questions and answers

Discover flashcards, test exam answers, and assignments to help you learn more about Animal Rights and other subjects. Don’t miss the chance to use them for more effective college education. Use our database of questions and answers on Animal Rights and get quick solutions for your test.

What is Animal Rights?

Animal rights is an important moral and ethical issue that has been debated for decades. Animals have long been considered property of humans, and as such, humans have often treated animals in ways that are cruel or unjust. In recent years, however, there has been a growing recognition of the rights of animals to live free from harm, exploitation and abuse by humans. Animal rights advocates argue that animals should be given the same consideration and respect as humans when it comes to decisions affecting their lives and well-being.All sentient creatures possess the right to live free from pain and suffering inflicted by human beings. The basic principle underlying animal rights is that all species should be given equal consideration in matters relating to their welfare; this includes things like humane treatment during research or testing activities, freedom from confinement in cages or other enclosures, freedom from physical abuse or use as entertainment objects (e.g., circuses), etc. Animal cruelty laws exist in many countries with fines or even imprisonment for those found guilty of mistreating animals; however, much more needs to be done both legislatively and socially if true animal rights are ever to become reality worldwide. The major argument against animal rights is based on the notion that because animals cannot speak for themselves they do not possess any real moral statustherefore it is essentially impossible to grant them any meaningful rights at all. However, many proponents of animal rights believe that this position fails to take into account the fact that animals do exhibit behaviors associated with emotions such as fear and happinessthereby indicating a capacity for suffering just as humans doand therefore deserve greater considerations when it comes to how they are treated by humankind. Furthermore, some scientists have argued that there exists evidence suggesting certain species display cognitive abilities similar to those of human children; thus implying some degree of moral status similar in kind if not degree with us Homo sapiens who are typically granted basic fundamental legal protections regarding their safety & wellbeing under most legal systems around the world today. In conclusion, although opinions on whether non-human creatures possess any legitimate claims for legal protection vary significantly depending upon one’s personal worldview & beliefs about our place within nature; there can be no doubt whatsoever about one thing: much work still needs to be done before we can truly say we live in a world where all sentient creatures enjoy full recognition & codified protection under law regardless of their species membership.