Sport Psychology Final Exam Flashcard

essay A+

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

With mention to published literature critically discuss the factors act uponing the effectivity of a athletics psychologist

Introduction

Sport psychological science has grown unusually from its roots in the formless and ill understood subjects of athlete motive and public presentation reding 40 old ages ago ( Dosil, 2005 ; Cox, 2005 ) . Modern athletics at every degree of competition and in virtually every sporting activity has benefited from the application of psychological rules and mental preparation in the chase of maximal athletic public presentation, stress direction, improved training attitude and every other facet of athletics where the head, emotions and physical public presentation intersect.

Sport psychological science is alone amongst the applied psychological science subjects for a figure of grounds. The phrase suggests that there are recognized common patterns employed by athleticss psychologists and its is acknowledged as with any scientific discipline, the baseline approaches to the instruction, preparation and enfranchisement of the athletics psychologist are good understood across the universe of athletics and athletic competition. The characteristic of athleticss psychological science pattern that tends to distinguish it from other signifier of applied psychological science is the general intimacy of the relationships developed between an single jock and their psychologist. The common professional boundaries of professional withdrawal are different in athleticss environments where intense emotion and competitory desire are the fuel that both drives the athlete onwards and makes them vulnerable to psychological emphasiss. Many athletics psychologists play a multi-dimensional function in the lives of their athlete clients – trained professional psychologist, friend, sounding board, confidante and adviser are each possible and wholly ethical constituent to the relationships that may develop in practise ( Watson, 2008, 1 ) .

This paper considers the inquiry of ‘effectiveness ‘ of the athleticss psychologist as considered within the undermentioned analytical and treatment model. A elaborate and properly academic analysis of why the scientific discipline of athleticss psychological science is effectual in the context of competitory and recreational athletics is beyond the range of this paper. The treatment that is developed below is premised on the proposition that athleticss psychological science is a proven and good accepted organic structure of scientific discipline that applied in conformity with its rules will by and large profit an jock. All jocks in all athleticss, squad and individualA from transverse state running to equestrienne events, in all age groups and genders are conformable to its benefits ( Kornspan & A ; McCracken, 2003: 36: Donohue, 2001: 19 ) . The of import inquiry in the present context is what factors, professional and personal render a athleticss psychologist successful in a peculiar application. Included in this distinct issue are a broad assortment of possible ethical considerations.

The inquiry requires that a preliminary working definition of athletics psychologist be articulated ; the definition as stated below besides assists in specifying the general countries of professional battle within athletics. The treatment will so prosecute two wide and interconnected inquiries: what steps athleticss psychologists take in any given assignment to accomplish maximal consequence with their jock ; where are the typical job countries that require attending in the athleticss psychologist / jock relationship? The accent of the treatment will be directed toEducational Sports Psychologistsas this country of athletics psychological science provides the most immediate connexions between athletic public presentation and the application of psychological rules.

These inquiries besides require consideration of the type of individual who is more likely to win as a athleticss psychologist – as with any professional activity where the topic is a human being, the delicate interface between the cognition based psychological instruction that helps to consist 1s mind and the frequently empathic endowment of “ covering ” with people is of import ( Armstrong, 2001 ; Griffin, 2008:10 ) . The paper draws upon the important representative sampling of the governments as appended to this paper in this respect.

The paper concludes with some ideas refering the awaited continued enlargement of the athletics psychologist function at all degrees of athletics. If these professionals have non already achieved such position in most athleticss, it is submitted that the patterned advance observed in the relationship between jocks and athleticss psychologist will follow the patterned advance from dad psychological science to of import preparation and training plus to an indispensible constituent of the preparation governments and competitory public presentation of all serious athletes.A

Sport Psychology – definition and range of the subject

The actual definition of athleticss psychological science is a deceivingly straightforward one. Harmonizing to Cox ( 1998 ) and confirmed as accepted throughout the literature, athletics psychological science is a “ … scientific discipline in which the rules of psychological science are applied in a athletics or exercising scene ” ( p.4 ) . The definition does non depend on the presence of a professional relationship with elite or aspirant high public presentation jocks ; the rules of athletics psychological science apply with necessary circumstantial alteration to every degree of jock. In this paper, the term “ sport psychologist ” shall widen to any professional engaged in the psychological science of athletics or exercising ( Douthitt & A ; Harvey, 1995: Griffin, 2008 ) ) .

As a general proposition there are three different types of athletics psychologists recognised in the field ; a great trade of the work carried out by a sport psychologist may include work in more than one class in the instance of a peculiar jock or assignment. For the intents of the treatments set out below, the boundaries between each bomber subject shall be regarded as comparatively fixed. In the present treatment, it is assumed that each class member is a to the full trained and accredited psychologist as defined by the relevant statue I their legal power ( British Psychological Society, 2009: American Psychological Society, 2009 ) .

The first class is theClinical/RedingSport Psychologist( Cox, 2005 ) .This individual is trained in clinical or reding psychological science and is a accredited psychologist. These psychologists are trained to help jocks to cover efficaciously with emotional and personality upset issues that affect peculiar jocks. The scope of prospective athletics patients that this professional might help is really wide ; an illustration would include handling a female gymnast who suffers from binge-eating syndrome or other eating upset given the competitory force per unit areas to execute at a specific weight. Treating a downhill skier of motorsports race driver who has troubles retrieving from a peculiar clang or hurt might be another.

The 2nd class is the grouping that includes theEducational Sport Psychologist( Cox, 2005 ; Kramer & A ; Moran, 2008 ) . These psychologists come to feature with an extended faculty member and practical background in university sections of physical instruction and athletics specific preparation. The aim of an intercession or on-going aid provided by these persons is to help the jock to develop a broad scope of possible psychological accomplishments for public presentation sweetening. Specific techniques such as assorted mental imagination sequences, self talk, the edifice of per public presentation or per competition modus operandis are all included in the work carried out by the psychologists in this class ( Morris & A ; Summers, 2004 ; Boyce & A ; King, 1993 ) . These psychologists besides provide services to jocks in a squad environment.

This peculiar definition besides provides an of import making refering the general function of psychological science in athletics. Sport psychologists are non monopolizers in this country. Many jocks have the benefit of psychological support as provided by a trainer, a place manager or a squad director ( Kornspan & A ; Duve, 2006 ; Wilson & A ; Stephens, 2005 ) . This component of athletics psychological science is really of import but is excluded from consideration here.

The concluding class is theResearch Sport Psychologist.This group is comprised of scientists and bookmans of athletics psychologist. Theirs is an of import support function to the full subject ( Cox, 2005 ) . Sport provides scientific discipline with ongoing chances to derive entree to jocks and squads in every athletics from its preseason, in season and station season /off season periodization. The psychologists engage in ongoing research and experiments in the field.

Applied athletics psychological science

Applied athletics and exercising psychological science involves the extension of psychological science theory and research into a specific field. While the peculiar jock or squad will necessarily pull the most attending in these applications, given that the chase of athletic excellence is a primary aim, the psychologist has a important function to play in the instruction of any managers, teammates, parents, fittingness professionals, and athletic trainers about the psychological facets of the specific athletics or exercising activity. Applied athletics and exercising psychologists seek to ease maximum engagement, public presentation, and enjoyment in any athletics environment.

The pattern of applied athletics and exercising psychological science normally involves a combination of single and group consulting or reding depending on the manner of the professional conducting the intercession and the demands of the client. The real property of recreational athletics is that many jocks do non hold the entree or agencies to hold a personal psychological adviser ( Maclean & A ; Hamm, 2008: 352 ) . Notwithstanding entree inquiries, the rules that support a proper practician / jock relationship are the same.

Key Issues

Sports psychologists face similar professional demands in countries such as go oning instruction and preparation. It is submitted that given the ceaseless committedness to athletic betterment, the development of new developing techniques, nutritionary and supplement attacks, physical monitoring, equipment tendencies and related factors places a significant force per unit area on a athleticss psychologist to stay current in all facets of their pattern ( Nesti, 2004 ) .

At its best articulation, athletics psychological science has a transformational power that elevates public presentation ( Armstrong, 2001, 4 ) . Experiential acquisition rhythms are frequently at the bosom of successful athletics psychological science pattern, because athletics public presentation typically provides immediate feedback as to the efficaciousness of the rhythms developed for the jock. Sport psychological science encourages an intensely personalized attack to all aspects of it application ; a important relationship exists between the personality of the practician and the effectivity of the applications ; the simple observation that non every psychologist can win in this country due to the restrictions of their ain personality is reinforced here.

For even the most occupied and ‘cutting border ‘ practicians, there are practical considerations to the subject that are submitted as both invariables and as overarching issues that ne’er decline in their importance. These are discussed here under the general rubric ofmoralss; as the illustrations below illustrate, the boundaries between professional competency, the responsibility of attention to the jock, go oning instruction refering best patterns, and the care of appropriate ethical criterions in all affairs affecting an jock or squad are non ever clear cut.

It is of import to appreciate that notwithstanding the alone demands of an single athletics or the immediateness that may be a portion of the practician / jock relationship, a psychologist remains bound by the statutory commissariats and the ethical ordinances of their legal power. The assorted Codes of Conduct do non make separate governments for the athleticss psychologist ; the attending to the jock relationship must be observed with the same attention as patient relationships in clinical or curative scenes. It may be observed that in an elect athleticss squad scene, where there is a big staff of professional athletics individuals that span a figure of subjects, merely the squad doctor and the athletics psychologist are apt to a criterion of ethical behavior that extends beyond their contractual duty to the squad or the common jurisprudence responsibilities of attention that might use to a manager – jock or trainer – jock scenario ( Nesti, 2004 ; Watson, 2008 ; Morris & A ; Summers, 2004 ) . Ethical codifications may be clearer cut when the practician ‘s relationship is with a grownup professional golf player or good paid football player ; the young person and overall potency for vulnerable individuals to be working with a athleticss psychologist render the standard ethical responsibilities really of import in pattern.

One might reason that given the credence of athletics psychological science as an of import component of modern athletics preparation and competition, that the more closely one could incorporate physical and psychological, athletic developing the more efficient the preparation over all and the more successful the athletic endeavor. Leaving aside the impossibleness of put ining combined manager / practicians at every degree of athletics, a looking following best option would be to guarantee a stopping point and centralised relationship between the athletic and psychological preparation programmes.

There are clear advantages to such a co-ordinated attack. The preparation clip required for each facet would be optimized ; the psychological preparation could be seamlessly integrated into every section of the physical preparation modus operandis. The trust implicit in the athlete / manager relationship could help the jock in get the better ofing any apprehensiveness about what to them may be fresh or confusing mental preparation attacks ( Wright & A ; Erdal, 2008: 187 ) .

The disadvantages are every bit blunt and it is submitted that the care of practician and coaching boundaries is of import in several possible countries of trouble. Where the manager and the psychologist are working really closely together in a squad athletics environment, there is the concern that the jock may be discerning about confiding in the psychologist or doing a complete committedness to a psychological preparation programme for fright of any mental / emotional failing being revealed to the manager and therefore compromising playing clip or position on the squad ( Watson & A ; Clement, 2008, 3 ) . The relationship between psychologist and jock, like manager and jock is inherently apowerrelationship ; the cognition that the practician applies to the psychological facets of developing make a dependence that must non be permitted to act upon any other relationships that the athlete has.A As Nesti notes ( 2004 ) , the undertaking confronting the practician is to at the same time keep openness to the jocks and managers without abandoning or thining their most personal and profoundly held values. This makes considerable demands upon the psychologist working in a athleticss environment “ … where the dominant values are those centred on self-preservation and material addition. “ ( 102 )

The moralss rubric takes on a farther and more complex dimension when a squad or athleticss administration retains a athletics psychologist to supply preparation. The ethical responsibilities and their corresponding lines can go bleary. The undermentioned hypothetical will exemplify the issue. A athletics psychologist is retained by a football squad to assist develop what the manager describes as “ mental stamina ” ( Wann & A ; Polk, 2007 ) .A The manager wants his participants to be more aggressive, more truculent and more physical in their attack to the game – “ I ‘m tired of our cats acquiring pushed around ” . It may be readily appreciated that there is a thin about indiscernible boundary between the manager ‘s “ stamina ” and a preparation programme that may as easy promote rough, violent or anti-social attitudes amongst the participants. The manager is determined to take newfound stamina instilled in the mental preparation government to a new competitory degree. The psychologist is now placed in a hard place – to develop as the nine ‘s consideration requires, or to potentially help in the publicity of emotional attitudes that are non needfully in the single jock ‘s involvement ( Goldstein & A ; Iso-Ahola, 2006 ) .

The athleticss psychologist has an of import preventive / renewing function in all facets of athletic preparation. ‘Burnout ‘ is a psychological job at every degree of competitory athletics, youth leagues to the professional ranks. ( Kalliath & A ; Beck, 2001 ; Matheson, Mathes & A ; Murray, 1997 ) The same cardinal trust relationship between practician and jock that build mental power in athletics must besides be applied where appropriate to protect – if an jock is non emotionally suited to a peculiar type of developing a practician has a positive ethical duty to stop it, no affair who is paying for the services.

Future Directions in Sport Psychology

It is impossible to supply a unequivocal decision as to the future way of athletics psychological science within the model of this paper. However, two probationary propositions may be advanced. The first is a predicted even greater trust by elect jocks on athletics psychologists to supply them with support in preparation and competition. Every jock in every athletics seeks the proverbial border, so frequently measured in millimetres or msecs. In an epoch of huge possible fiscal returns for athletics success, a athleticss psychologist is a cost-efficient preparation assistance.

The 2nd anticipation is connected to the development of the subject itself. Competitive jocks are result driven ; for society as a whole, there are fewer ways to through empirical observation mensurate social athletic or sport exercising success. The cost of wellness attention as attributed to hapless life manner picks and sedentary attitudes may militate in favor of a public push to integrate athleticss psychologists into the public wellness mainstream, on the same cost effectiveness rational as observed in elect athleticss.

Plants Cited

American Psychological AssociationEthical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct( 2009 )[ online ] Retrieved November 18, 2009 at: & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www.apa.org/ethics/ & gt ;

Armstrong, Scott. “ Are You a “ Transformational ” Coach? ”JOPERD — The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & A ; Dance72.3 ( 2001 ) : 44

British Psychological SocietyEthical Guidelines( 2009 ) [ on-line ] Retrieved November 21, 2009 at: & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www.bps.org.uk/the-society/code-of-conduct/code-of-conduct_home.cfm & gt ;

Boyce, B. Ann, and Valerie King “ Goal-Setting Strategies for Coaches ”JOPERD — The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & A ; Dance64.1 ( 1993 ) : 65+ .Questia. Web. 24 Nov. 2009.

Cox, Richard H.SportPsychology: Concepts and Applications( 5th ed. ) Toronto: McGraw Hill ( 2005 )

Donohue, Brad, et Al. “ The Development and Initial Evaluation of Two Promising Mental Preparatory Methods in a Sample of Female Cross Country Runners. ”Journal of Sport Behavior24.1 ( 2001 ) : 19

Dosil, Joaquin, erectile dysfunction.The Sport Psychologist ‘s Handbook: A Guide for Sport-Specific Performance EnhancementChichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & A ; Sons, ( 2005 )

Douthitt, Vicki L. , and Mark L. Harvey “ Exercise Counseling – How Physical Educators Can Help ”JOPERD — The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & A ; Dance66.5 ( 1995 ) : 31

Goldstein, Jay D. , and Seppo E. Iso-Ahola “ Promoting Sportsmanship in Youth Sports: Positions from Sport Psychology ; Sport Psychology Provides Crucial Insights for Bettering Behavior in Sport. ”JOPERD — The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & A ; Dance77.7 ( 2006 ) : 18

Griffin, Joy. “ Sport Psychology: Myths in Sport Education and Physical Education Sport Psychology Is n’t Just for the Elites ; It Can Profit Everyone in Youth Sports and Physical Education. ”JOPERD — The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & A ; Dance79.8 ( 2008 ) : 11

Kalliath, Thomas J. , and Alexandra Beck “ Is the Path to Burnout and Turnover Paved by a Lack of Supervisory Support? A Structural Equations Test ”New ZealandJournal of Psychology30.2 ( 2001 ) : 72

Kornspan, Alan S. , and Mary J. McCracken “ The Use of Psychology in Professional Baseball: The Pioneering Work of David F. Tracy. ”Nine11.2 ( 2003 ) : 36

Kornspan, Alan S. , and Michael A. Duve “ A Niche and a Need: A Summary of the Need for Sport Psychology Consultants in Collegiate Sports. ”Annalss of the American Psychotherapy Association9.1 ( 2006 ) : 19

Kremer, J. , & A ; Moran, A. P.Pure Sport: Practical athletics psychological science. London: Routledge ( 2008 )

Maclean, Joanne, and Shannon Hamm “ Values and Sport Participation: Comparison Participant Groups, Age, and Gender. ”Journal of Sport Behavior31.4 ( 2008 ) : 352

Matheson, Hilary, Sharon Mathes, and Mimi Murray “ The Effect of Winning and Losing on Female Interactive and Coactive Team Cohesion ”Journal of Sport Behavior20.3 ( 1997 ) : 284

Morris, T. , and Summers, J. , eds.Sport psychological science: theory, application and issues( 2nd Ed. ) . Chichester: Wiley ( 2004 )

Nesti, Mark.Experiential Psychology and Sport: Theory and Application. New York: Routledge, 2004

Wann, Daniel L. , and Joshua Polk “ The Positive Relationship between Sport Team Identification and Belief in the Trustworthiness of Others ”North American Journal of Psychology9.2 ( 2007 ) : 251

Wilson, Marcia A. , and Dawn E. Stephens “ Great Expectations: How Do Athletes of Different Expectancies Attribute Their Percept of Personal Athletic Performance? ”Journal of Sport Behavior28.4 ( 2005 ) : 392

Watson, Jack Cand Damien Clement ‘Ethical and Practical Issues Related to Multiple Role Relationships in Sport Psychology ‘( 2008 ) [ on-line ] Retrieved November 22, 2009 at: & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www.athleticinsight.com/Vol10Iss4/Multiple.htm & gt ;

Wright, Perry B. , and Kristi J. Erdal “ Sport Superstition as a Function of Skill Level and Task Difficulty ”Journal of Sport Behavior31.2 ( 2008 ) : 187

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member
unlock